Go to the content. | Move to the navigation | Go to the site search | Go to the menu | Contacts | Accessibility

| Create Account

Cortesi, Giulio Alvaro (2018) Les Ă©manations de l'Ă©tat Ă  vocation Ă©conomique dans l'arbitrage d'investissement et dans le contentieux de l'O.M.C. [Ph.D. thesis]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Preview
PDF Document
2876Kb

Abstract (italian or english)

The idea of a thesis on state enterprises in international investment law finds its roots in their impressive economic development during the last decade, which, on the one hand, gives considerable relevance to this theme given its inherent actuality and, on the other hand, there is a considerable interest in the juridical problems that these entities leave open. The thesis consists of a preliminary chapter, were the legal form of these institutions has been analysed, from both an empirical assessment and the standpoint of national and international law applicable to these subjects. The empirical, in-depth analysis, not yet reached in the collections of examined contributions, turned up as fundamental, because some of the legal issues concerning state enterprises cannot really be tackled without such an approach. The more juridical body of the thesis, devoted only to legal analysis, is composed of three parts and has two main poles of interest: the first linked to the understanding of the legal implications of these entities and a second, and, wider one, aimed at understanding what the treatment of these bodies, occurred in the dispute cases examined, can tell us at a systemic level about international investment law, which has required also a targeted comparison with commercial arbitration and international trade law.

Abstract (a different language)


L'idea di una tesi sulle imprese pubbliche nel diritto internazionale degli investimenti ha preso le mosse dall'impressionante sviluppo economico di queste entità Ú nell'ultima decade, che conferisce una notevole attualitĂ  a questo tema, da un lato, dall'altro dall'interesse delle problematiche giuridiche che queste creature aprono. La tesi si compone di un capitolo preliminare che ha analizzato la forma giuridica di questi enti sia in chiave empirica riferito a forma giuridica, che dal punto di vista del diritto nazionale e internazionale applicabile alla materia. Questo studio preliminare ha permesso di verificare con una profondità  e un dettaglio non ancora raggiunto nelle raccolte di contributi sin qui esaminati, come alcune delle questioni giuridiche relative alle imprese di stato non siano davvero affrontabili senza uno studio veramente empirico. Il corpo piĂč strettamente giuridico della tesi Ăš composto dalle tre parti successive ed ha due principali poli d'interesse: il primo, piĂč evidente, legato alla comprensione del trattamento giuridico da riservare a questi enti e un secondo di piĂč ampio respiro, volta a comprendere cosa il trattamento di questi enti possa dirci a livello sistemico sul diritto internazionale degli investimenti, cosa che ha richiesto una comparazione mirata con l'arbitrato commerciale e con il diritto del commercio internazionale.

Statistiche Download
EPrint type:Ph.D. thesis
Tutor:Gattini, Andrea and Ascensio, Hervé
Ph.D. course:Ciclo 30 > Corsi 30 > DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE E DIRITTO PRIVATO E DEL LAVORO
Data di deposito della tesi:28 June 2018
Anno di Pubblicazione:28 June 2018
Key Words:State Owned Enterprises - Sovereign Wealth Funds - Investment Arbitration
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 12 - Scienze giuridiche > IUS/13 Diritto internazionale
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche, Giuridiche e Studi Internazionali
Codice ID:11266
Depositato il:08 Nov 2019 10:56
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

Ouvrages généraux : Cerca con Google

ABI-SAAB, G., Les Exceptions Préliminaires dans la Procédure de la Cour Internationale, Paris, A. Pedone, 1967. Cerca con Google

AMADIO, M., Le Contentieux International de l’investissement privĂ©, Paris, Libraire GĂ©nĂ©rale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1967. Cerca con Google

AMERASINGHE, C. F., Jurisdiction of Specific International Tribunals, Leiden, Martinis Nijhoff Publishers, 2009. Cerca con Google

APPLETON, E., PLUMMER, M. G., The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, New York, Springer US, 2005. Cerca con Google

BALTAG, C., The Energy Charter Treaty, The Notion of Investor, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2012. Cerca con Google

BANTEKAS, I., An Introduction to International Arbitration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015. Cerca con Google

BASSAN, F., Research Handbook on Sovereign Wealth Funds and International Investment Law, Glos, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2015. Cerca con Google

BASSAN, F., The Law of Sovereign Wealth Funds, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publisher, 2011. Cerca con Google

BILLET, J., International Investment Arbitration, A Practical Handbook, Antwerp, Maklu, 2016. Cerca con Google

BLACKABY, N., PARTASIDES, C., REDFERN, A., AND MARTIN HUNTER, M., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017. Cerca con Google

BLACKABY, N., PARTASIDES, C., REDFERN, A., HUNTER, M., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Fifth Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

BREAKOULAKIS, S. L., Third Parties in International Commercial Arbitration, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010. Cerca con Google

BROWN, C., A Common Law of International Adjudication, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

BROWN, C., Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

BROWNLIE, I., Principles of International Law, Sixth Edition, New York, Oxford University Press 2003. Cerca con Google

BROWNLIE, I., System of the Law of Nations, State Responsibility, part. 1, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1983. Cerca con Google

CAMERON, P. D., International Energy Investment Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010 Cerca con Google

CANAL-FORGUES, E., Le rĂšglement des diffĂ©rends Ă  l’O.M.C., Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2e Ă©dition, 2004. Cerca con Google

CHAEVA, N., Les exceptions prĂ©liminaires dans l’arbitrage sur le fondent des traitĂ©s de promotion et de protection des investissements, ThĂšse Soutenue le 5 dĂ©cembre 2014. Cerca con Google

CHANG, Y., The Interpretation of Treaties by Judicial Tribunals, London, Columbia University Press, 1933. Cerca con Google

CHENG, B., General Principles of Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals, London, Stevens and Sons Limited, 1953. Cerca con Google

COMMONS, J. R., The Legal Foundation of Capitalism, New York, The Macmillan Company 1924. Cerca con Google

COOK, G., A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence on Public International Law Concepts and Principles, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015. Cerca con Google

CORTEN, O., KLEIN, P., Les Conventions de Vienne sur le Droits des Traités, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2006. Cerca con Google

COTE, C., E., La participation des personnes privĂ©es au rĂšglement des diffĂ©rends internationaux Ă©conomiques : l’élargissement du droit de porter plainte Ă  l’O.M.C., Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J., State Responsibility, The General Part, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

DAOUDI, R., La représentation en droit international public, Paris, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1980. Cerca con Google

DAVEY, W. J., Enforcing world trade rules: essays on WTO dispute settlement and GATT obligations, London, Cameron May, 2006. Cerca con Google

DE BRABANDERE, E., Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law, Procedural Aspects and Implications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014. Cerca con Google

DEBBASCH C., COLIN, F., Droit Administratif, Paris, 11e Ă©dition, Economica, 2014. Cerca con Google

DEL VECCHIO, A., Le Parti nel Processo Internazionale, Milano, Giuffré, 1975. Cerca con Google

DELACOUR, C. B., Les fonds souverains, Eyrolles, Les Echos, Paris, 2009. Cerca con Google

DELLAPENNA, J., Suing Foreign Governments and Their Corporations, Ardsley, Transnational Publisher, 2002. Cerca con Google

DIALLO, O., Le consentement des parties à l’arbitrage international, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2010. Cerca con Google

DICKINSON, A., et LINDSAY, R., State Immunity, New York, Oxford University Press, 2004. Cerca con Google

DJEFFFAL, C., Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Cerca con Google

DOLZER, R. and SCHREUER, C., Principles of International Investment Law, Second Edition, Croydon, Oxford University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

DOLZER, R., STEVENS, M., Bilateral Investment Treaties, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995. Cerca con Google

DORR, O., SCHMALENBACH, K., Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, A commentary, Second Edition, Heidelberg, Springer, 2018. Cerca con Google

DOUGLAS, Z., The international law of investment claims, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

ESCARCENA, S. L., Indirect expropriation in International Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishings, 2014. Cerca con Google

FOX, H., The Law of State Immunity, New York, Oxford University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

GAILLARD, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Boston, 2010. Cerca con Google

GALLAGHER, N., W. SHAN W., Chinese Investment Treaties, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

GARDINER, R., Treaty Interpretation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

GARSONNET et BRU C., Traité théorique et pratique de procédure civile, troisiÚme édition, Paris, 1898, Tome I. Cerca con Google

GAZZINI, T., Interpretation of International Investment Treaties, Oxford and Portland, Hart Publishing, 2016. Cerca con Google

GROSSEN, J., Les Présomption en Droit International, Neuchùtel, Delachaux et Niestlé, 1954. Cerca con Google

HAMANN, A., Le contentieux de la mise en conformitĂ© dans le rĂšglement des diffĂ©rends de l’O.M.C., Leiden et Boston, Brill, 2014. Cerca con Google

HANOTIAU, B., Complex Arbitration Multiparty, Multicontract, Multi-issue and Class Actions, The Hague, Kluwer, 2006. Cerca con Google

HIGGINS R., Problems and Process, International Law and How we use it, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994. Cerca con Google

HORN H., MAVROIDIS P.C., The WTO Case Law of 2006–7, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2009. Cerca con Google

ICSID., History of the Convention: documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, Washington DC: ICSID, 1968. Cerca con Google

ISLAM, M. R., International Trade Law of the WTO, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006. Cerca con Google

JACKSON, J. H., Legal Problems of International Economic Relations, Cases, Materials and Text, St. Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co, 1977. Cerca con Google

JACKSON, J. H., Sovereignity, The WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law, Cambbridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. Cerca con Google

JACOBS, Q.C., MASTERS, L.S., STANLEY, Q.C., Liability Insurance In International Arbitration, Portland, Hart Publishing, 2011. Cerca con Google

JESSUP, P., Transnational Law, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1956. Cerca con Google

KEEFE, R., TAMS, C. J., The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunity of States and their property, a Commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

KIOS, H. E., Applicable Law in Investor State Arbitration, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

KOLB, R., La Cour internationale de Justice, Paris, A. Pedone, 2013. Cerca con Google

KULICK, A., Global Public Interest in International Investment Law, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

LANDRY, P. F., Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: the Communist Party’s control of local elites in the post-Mao era, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

LESAFFRE, H., Le rĂšglement des diffĂ©rends au sein de l’O.M.C. et le Droit de la ResponsabilitĂ©, Paris, L.G.D.J, 2007. Cerca con Google

LOUKAS A., MISTELIS & STAVROS L. BREKOULAKIS, Arbitrability, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer Arbitration, 2009. Cerca con Google

LOWENFELD, A. F., International Economic Law, 2nd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

LUFF, D., Le Droit de l’Organisation Mondiale du Commerce, Ed. Bruylant L.G.D.J., Bruxelles 2004. Cerca con Google

MABROUK, M., Les exceptions de procédure devant les Juridictions Internationales, Paris, Libraire générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1966. Cerca con Google

MALINVERNI, G., Le rÚglement des différends dans les organisations internationales économiques, Leiden, Sijthoff, 1974. Cerca con Google

MAREK, K., A Digest of the Decisions of the International Court, La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff, 1957. Cerca con Google

MARESCA, A., Il Diritto dei Trattati, Milano, Giuffré, 1971. Cerca con Google

MARTIN, A., L’estoppel en Droit International Public, Paris, Pedone, 1979. Cerca con Google

MATSUSHITA, M., SCHOENBAUM, T. J., MAVROIDIS, P., HAHN, M., The World Trade Organization, Law, Practice, and Policy, Third Edition, The Oxford International Law Library, 2015. Cerca con Google

MAVROIDIS, P.C., The Regulation of International Trade, Volume 1, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2016. Cerca con Google

MCCORRISON, S., MACLAREN, D., State Trading, the WTO and GATT Article XVII, Oxford, Blackwell Publisher Ltd 2002. Cerca con Google

McMAHON, J., The WTO Agreement on Agriculture, A commentary, Oxford University Press, 2006. Cerca con Google

MERKOURIS, P., Article 31 (3) (c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration, Leiden, Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave, Brill, 2015. Cerca con Google

MITCHELL, A. D., Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Cerca con Google

MONTT, S., State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Oxford and Portland, Hart Publishing, 2009. Cerca con Google

MOURI, A., The International Law of Expropriation as Reflected in the Work of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 1994. Cerca con Google

MUCHLINSKI, P. T., Multinational Enterprises & the Law, Oxford, Oxford International Law Library, 2007. Cerca con Google

MUNIN, N., Legal Guide to GATTs, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2010. Cerca con Google

NIKIEMA, S. H., L’expropriation indirecte en droit international des investissements, Seconde Edition, Genùve, Graduate Institute Publications, 2015. Cerca con Google

NSOUR, M. F. A., Rethinking the World Trade Order Towards a Better Legal Understanding of the Role of Regionalism in the Multilateral Trade Regime, Leiden, Sidestone Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

OMALU, M. K., NAFTA and the Energy Charter Treaty, Boston, Kluwer Law Arbitration, 1999. Cerca con Google

PALMETER, D., MAVROIDIS, C. P., Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization, Second Edition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

PARK, W.W., Arbitration of the International Business Disputes, Second Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

POMERANZ, K. TOPIK S., The World That Trade Created, London, Sharpe, 2013. Cerca con Google

POSNER E. A., O SYKES A., Economic Foundations of International Law, Cambridge MA, London, Harvard University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

ROE T., HAPPOLD M., Settlement of Investment Disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty, Cambridge University Press, 2011. Cerca con Google

ROSENNE, S., The International Court of Justice, Leiden, A. W. Sijthoff’s Uitgeversmaatschappij N. V., 1957. Cerca con Google

ROSENTRETER, D., Article 31 (3) (c) of the Vienna Convention on The Law of Treaties and the Principle of Systemic Integration in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Nomos, 2015. Cerca con Google

SALACUSE, J. W., The Law of Investment Treaties, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010. Cerca con Google

SALACUSE, J., W., The Law of Investment Treaties, New York, II ed., Oxford University Press, 2015. Cerca con Google

SANTULLI, C., Droit du contentieux international, 2e Ă©dition, Paris, L.G.D.J, 2015. Cerca con Google

SASSON, M., Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer, 2017. Cerca con Google

SAVARESE, E., La nozione di Giurisdizione nel sistema ICSID, Napoli, Editoriale Scientifica S.r.l., 2012. Cerca con Google

SCHILL, S. W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

SCHREUER. C. H., MALINTOPPI L., REINISCH A., SINCLAIR A., The ICSID CONVENTION, a Commentary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

SCHWARZENBERGER, G., The Inductive Approach to International Law, London, Stevens & Sons, 1965. Cerca con Google

SELIVANOVA, Y., The Energy Charter and the International Energy Governance, SELIVANOVA, Y., Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law, WTO, NAFTA and ENERGY CHARTER, Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer, 2011 Cerca con Google

SHANY, Y., Questions of Jurisdiction and Admissibility before International Courts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Cerca con Google

SHIHATA, I. I. F., The power of the International Court of Justice to determine its own jurisdiction, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1965. Cerca con Google

SPIERMANN, O., International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005. Cerca con Google

STEGER, D. P., The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization, ASIL Proceeding, 2004. Cerca con Google

STEINGRUBER, A. M., Consent in International Arbitration, Croydon, Oxford University Press, 2002. Cerca con Google

STEINGRUBER, A. M., Consent in International Arbitration, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

SUBEDI, S. P., International Investment Law, Third Edition, Bloomsbury, Hart Publishing, 2016. Cerca con Google

TANZI, A., CRISTIANI, F., International Investment Law and Arbitration, Padova, Cedam, 2013. Cerca con Google

TAYLOR, M., International Competition Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. Cerca con Google

TOLHURST, G., The Assignment of Contractual Rights, Second Edition, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2016. Cerca con Google

TOOPE, S. J., Mixed International Arbitration, Cambridge, Grotius Publications Limited, 1990. Cerca con Google

TWEEDDALE, A., TWEEDDALE, K., Arbitration of Commercial Disputes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010. Cerca con Google

VADI, V., Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Cerca con Google

VAN DEN BOSSCHE P., ZDOUC W., The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, Third Edition, Cambidge, Cambridge University Press, 2013. Cerca con Google

VAN HARTEN, G., Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007. Cerca con Google

VANDEKERCHOVE, K., Piercing the Corporate Veil, Alphen aan den Rijin, Kluwer Law International, 2007. Cerca con Google

VANDEVELDE, K. J., U.S. International Investment Agreements, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009. Cerca con Google

VEDIE, H., Les Fonds Souverains - Une Puissance financiĂšre insensible aux crises, Paris, Eska, 2010. Cerca con Google

VILLIGER, M. E., Commentary on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston 2009. Cerca con Google

VISSCHER, C., Aspects Récents du droit Procédural de la Cour International de Justice, Paris, A. Pedone, 1966. Cerca con Google

VISSCHER, C., ProblĂšmes d’InterprĂ©tation Judiciaire en Droit International Public, Paris A. Pedone, 1963. Cerca con Google

VOSS, J. O., The Impact of Investment Treaties on Contracts between Host States and Foreign Investors, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011. Cerca con Google

WANG, G., International Investment Law: A Chinese Perspective, New York, Routledge, 1st Edition, 2015. Cerca con Google

WEBSTER, H. T., Handbook of Investment Arbitration, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2012. Cerca con Google

WEERAMANTRY, R., Treaty Interpretation in Investment Arbitration, Croydon, Oxford University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

WYLER, E., La rÚgle dite de la continuité de la nationalité dans le contentieux international, Paris, P.U.F., 1990. Cerca con Google

YANG, X., State Immunity in International Law, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012. Cerca con Google

YANNACA-SMALL, K., Arbitration Under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues, Oxford, Oxford University, 2018. Cerca con Google

Courses de la Haye: Cerca con Google

BROCHES, A., «The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of other states », R.C.A.D.I., vol. II – 136, 1972, p. 331 – 410. Cerca con Google

CONDORELLI, L., « L’imputation Ă  l’État d’un fait internationalement illicite : solutions classiques et nouvelles tendances », R.C.A.D.I., vol. – VI, 189, 1984, p. 19 - 221. Cerca con Google

DENDIAS, M., « Les Principaux Service Internationaux administratifs », R.C.A.D.I., 1938, vol.-I, 63, p. 247- 358. Cerca con Google

FRANCOIS, M.J.P.A., « La Cour Permanente d’Arbitrage, son origine, sa jurisprudence, son avenir », R.C.A.D.I., vol. 88 - II, 1955, p. 457- 575. Cerca con Google

LALIVE, P. A., « ProblĂšmes relatifs Ă  l’arbitrage international commercial », R.C.A.D.I., vol. 120-I, 1967, p. 573 – 711. Cerca con Google

LEBEN, C., « Contrat d’État et droit international des investissements », R.C.A.D.I., vol. 302-II, 2003, p. 201 – 376. Cerca con Google

MBAYE, V. K., « L’intĂ©rĂȘt Pour agir devant la Cour International de Justice », R.C.A.D.I., vol. 209-II, 1988, p. 223 - 345. Cerca con Google

QUENEUDEC, J. P., « La notion d’État intĂ©ressĂ© en Droit International », R.C.A.D.I., vol. 255 -VI, 1995, p. 343 – 461. Cerca con Google

RIAD F., A. M., « L’entreprise Publique et Semi-publique en droit international privĂ© », R.C.A.D.I, vol.-I, 1963, p. 561 - 691. Cerca con Google

SALVIOLI, G., « Les rÚgles générales de la paix », R.C.A.D.I., vol. IV - 46, 1933, p. 95 - 422. Cerca con Google

SALVIOLI, G., « ProblÚmes de procédure dans la jurisprudence internationale », R.C.A.D.I., vol. - 91, 1957, p. 553 - 617. Cerca con Google

TRUYOL Y SERRA, A., « Cours gĂ©nĂ©ral de droit international public », R.C.A.D.I., vol. - IV, 1981, p. 13 – 421. Cerca con Google

WITENBERG, J. C., « La recevabilitĂ© des rĂ©clamations devant les Jurisdictions Internationales », R.C.A.D.I., vol. – III, 1932 p. 5 - 134. Cerca con Google

Articles de doctrine: Cerca con Google

ANDERSON, R. D., « Making law in “new” WTO subject areas », in MARCEAU, G., A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO, World Trade Organization, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015, p. 275 – 290. Cerca con Google

ARATO, J., « Accounting for Difference in Treaty Interpretation Over Time », in BIANCHI, A., PEAT, D., WINDSOR, M., Interpretation in International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 205 – 228. Cerca con Google

ASCENSIO, H., « Article 31 of the Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties and International Investment Law », ICSID Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2016, p. 366 – 387. Cerca con Google

AUDIT, M., « La Coexistence de procĂ©dures contentieuses en matiĂšre d’investissement Ă©trangĂšres », Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional (ACDI), 2017, 10, p. 333 – 370. Cerca con Google

BÖCKSTIEGEL, K. H., « Commercial and Investment Arbitration: How Different are they Today? », Arbitration International, 2012, p. 577 – 590. Cerca con Google

BOWETT D. W., « Estoppel before International Tribunals and Its Relation to Acquiescence », British Yearbook of International Law, 1957, p. 176 - 202. Cerca con Google

BOYD A. H. et al., « The Emergency Economic Stabilization act and responses to the Credit Crisis - An Interim Report », Banking Law Journal, 2009, p. 3 – 35. Cerca con Google

BROCHES, A. M., « La Convention et l’Assurance – Investissements », in Investissements Etrangers et Arbitrage entre Etats et personnes privĂ©es, Paris, Pedone, 1969, p. 161 - 176. Cerca con Google

BROWER C. N. and KUMAR S. P., « Investommercial Arbitration: Whence Cometh It? What Is It? Whither Goeth It? », ICSID Review, 2015, p. 35 – 55. Cerca con Google

CHEN, R., « A Contractual Approach to Investor-State regulatory disputes », The Yale Journal of International Law, 2015, p. 295 – 336. Cerca con Google

COLLINS, D., « National treatment in emerging investment treaties », in SANDERS, A. K., The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law, Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK, p. 161 – 182. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J. S. C., « Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility », ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2010, p. 127 - 199. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J., « The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A retrospect », The American Journal of International Law, 2002, p. 874 – 890. Cerca con Google

CRAWFORD, J., OLLESON, S., «The application of the Rules of State Responsibility», in BUNGENBERG, M., GRIEBEL, J., HOBE, S., REINSCH, A., International Investment Law, A Handbook, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, 2015, p. 411 - 441. Cerca con Google

DANIEL-HENRI, V., « L’arrĂȘt de la C.I.J. du 28 novembre 1958 (affaire relative Ă  l’application de la Convention de 1902 pour rĂ©gler la tutelle des mineurs, Pays-Bas c. SuĂšde) », Annuaire français de droit international, 1958, p. 250 – 256. Cerca con Google

DE LA PADRELLE, P., « La Notion de Service public », Revue Critique de LĂ©gislation et de Jurisprudence, 1934, p. 516 – 539. Cerca con Google

DEBLOCK C., LEBULLENGER J. et PAQUIN S., DIR, « Un Nouveau Pont sur l’Atlantique : l’Accord Economique et Commercial Global entre l’Union EuropĂ©enne et le Canada », QuĂ©bec, Presses de l’UniversitĂ© du QuĂ©bec, 2015, p. 223 – 228. Cerca con Google

DEL MAR, K., « The ICJ and the Standard of Proof », in BANNELIER, K. et. al., The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law, the enduring impact of the Corfu Channel Case, Suffolk, Routledge, 2012, p. 98 - 123. Cerca con Google

DIMASCIO, N., and PAUWELYN J., « Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds apart or two sides of the Same coin? », The American Journal of International Law, 2008, p. 48 – 89. Cerca con Google

DOUGLAS, Z., « The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration », in British Yearbook of International Law, 2004, p. 151 - 289. Cerca con Google

FEIT, M., « Responsibility of the State Under International Law for the Breach of Contract Committed by a State-Owned Entity», Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2010, p. 142 -173. Cerca con Google

FORTIER, L. Y., « Canadian Approach to Investment Protection », in BINDER, C., International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 515 – 536. Cerca con Google

GAILLARD, E., « Abuse of Process in International Arbitration », ICSID Review, 2017, p. 17 – 37. Cerca con Google

GAILLARD, E., « Identify or Define? Reflection on the evolution of the concept of investment in ICSID practice», in BINDER, C. et al., International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Essay in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford University Press, New York, 2009, p. 403 – 416 Cerca con Google

GALLUS, N., PETERSON, L. E., « International Investment Treaty Protection of NGOs », Arbitration International, 2006, p. 527 – 548. Cerca con Google

GARCIA, F. J. et al., « Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law », Journal of International Economic Law, 2015, p. 861 – 892. Cerca con Google

GARDINER, R., « The Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation », HOLLIS B. D., The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 479 – 490. Cerca con Google

GIARDINA, A., « L’exĂ©cution des sentences du Centre international pour le rĂšglement des diffĂ©rends relatifs aux investissements », Revue Critique de Droit International PrivĂ©, 1982, p. 273 - 293. Cerca con Google

GULLAND, E., «Can a Party Benefiting from an Award Rendered Against a State Enforce the Award Against an Instrumentality of Such State? » in GAILLARD E., YOUNAN ed., State Entities in International Arbitration, IAI Seriers, Juris Publishing, Huntington, New York 2008, p. 97 – 195. Cerca con Google

GUZMAN, A. T., « Explaining the popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties », in SAUVANT K. P. SACHS L.E., The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment, Oxford University Press, p. 73 - 97. Cerca con Google

HANOTIAU, B., « What Law Governs the Issue of Arbitrability », Arbitration International, 1996, p. 391 – 403. Cerca con Google

HANOTIAU, B., « What Law Governs the Issue of Arbitrability », Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 2014, p. 874 – 885. Cerca con Google

HANOTIAU, B., « L’arbitrabilitĂ© des litiges en matiĂšre de droit des sociĂ©tĂ©s », in BERNARDINI, P., Liber amicorum Claude Reymond : autour de l’arbitrage : mĂ©langes offerts Ă  Claude Reymond, Lexis Nexis, 2004, p. 97- 109. Cerca con Google

HENRY, M., « ThĂ©orie du Groupe de SociĂ©tĂ©s AppliquĂ©e aux Arbitrages Impliquant un État », International Business Law Journal, 2006, p. 297 - 318. Cerca con Google

HOBER, K., « State Responsibility and Attribution », in MUCHLINSKI P., The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, New York, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 552 – 582. Cerca con Google

HUBERT, T., « L’affaire du Cameroun septentrional (Cameroun c./ Royaume Uni) devant la Cour internationale de justice », Annuaire français de droit international, 1963, p. 358 – 360. Cerca con Google

JARROSON, C., « La Notion d’ArbitrabilitĂ© », Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, 2003, p. 173 – 180. Cerca con Google

KOH, H. H., « Transnational Legal Process », in SIMPSON, G., The Nature of International Law, Ashagate, Burlington, 2001, p. 311 - 337. Cerca con Google

KOTUBY, C. T. and EGERTON-VERNON, J. A., « Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v. The Government of the United States of America », ICSID Review, 2015, p. 486 – 497. Cerca con Google

KOUTOGLIDOU, A., « Multiple Party investment dispute resolution: who are the proper parties? » in PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION, Multiple Party Actions in International Arbitration, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009, p. 255 - 278. Cerca con Google

KRIEBAUM, U., « The PCIJ and the Protection of Foreign Investments », in TAMS, C., FITZMAURICE, M., Legacies of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Nijhoff, Boston, 2013, p. 145 - 173. Cerca con Google

LALIGANT, M., « La notion d’intĂ©rĂȘt pour agir et le juge administratif », Revue du Droit Public et de la Science Politique en France et Ă  l’Etranger, 1971, p. 43 - 82. Cerca con Google

LALIVE, P., « Some Threats to International Investment Arbitration », ICSID Review, Foreign Investment Law journal, 1986, p. 26 – 40. Cerca con Google

MAYER, P., « Litispendance, connexitĂ© et chose jugĂ©e dans l’arbitrage international », in REYMOND et al., Liber Amicorum Claude Reymond, Litec, 2004, p. 185 - 204. Cerca con Google

MCLACHLAN, C., « Investment Treaties and General International Law », International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2008, p. 361 – 401. Cerca con Google

MILANO, E., « The Investment Arbitration between Italy and Cuba: The Application of Customary International Law under Scrutiny », The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 2012, p. 499 – 524. Cerca con Google

MITCHELL, A., and HENCKELS, C., « Variations on a Theme: Comparing the Concept of “Necessity” in International Investment Law and WTO Law », Chicago Journal of International Law, p. 93 - 164. Cerca con Google

MOSS, G. C., « Commercial Arbitration and Investment Arbitration Fertile Soil for False Friends? » in BINDER, C. et al., International Investment Law for the 21st Century, Essay in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 782 – 797. Cerca con Google

NEWCOMBE, A., « Investor misconduct: jurisdiction, admissibility or merits », in BROWN C., MILES K., Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 187 - 200. Cerca con Google

NGUYEN, S. T., « The applicability of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens in World Trade Organization dispute settlement », Bond Law Review, 2013, p. 123 – 165. Cerca con Google

PARK, W. W., «The Arbitrator’s Jurisdiction to Determine Jurisdiction», ICCA Congress, MontrĂ©al 2006, 13 ICCA Congress Series 55, p. 3 – 148. Cerca con Google

PELLET, A., « International Court of Justice case law in ICSID », ASA Bulletin, 31, September, 3/2013, p. 684 - 690. Cerca con Google

PERERA, S. M., « State Responsibility, Ascertaining the Liability of States in Foreign Investment Disputes», The Journal of World Investment e Trade, 2005, p. 500 - 529. Cerca con Google

PETROCHILOS, G., « Bosh International Inc. and B&P Ltd Foreign Investment Enterprise v. Ukraine. When is Conduct by a University Attributable to State? », ICSID Review, 2013, p. 262 - 272. Cerca con Google

PIWNICA, E., « Á propos de l’intĂ©rĂȘt Ă  agir devant la juridiction administrative », in TEITGEN-COLLY C., L’accĂšs au juge : l’intĂ©rĂȘt Ă  agir, Actes du Colloque organisĂ© le 20 juin 2014, Paris, L.G.D.J., 2016, p. 35 - 46. Cerca con Google

POLÁƠEK, P., TONOVA, S. T., « Enforcement against States: Investment Arbitration and WTO Litigation», in JORGE HUERTA-GOLDMAN J. H., ANTOINE ROMANETTI A., AND FRANZ X. STIRNIMANN F. X., « WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration », Kluwer Law International, 2013, p. 357 – 388. Cerca con Google

RADI, Y., « International investment law and development: A history of two concepts », in SCHILL, S. W., TAMS, C. J., HOFMAN, R., International Investment Law and development, Elgar, 2015. Cerca con Google

ROBERT, A., « Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies shaping the investment treaty system », in The American Journal of International Law, 2013, p. 1 - 51. Cerca con Google

ROBERTS, A., « Power and Persuasion in investment treaty arbitration », The American Journal of International Law, 2010, p. 179 – 225. Cerca con Google

SACCO, R., « Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law », American Journal of Comparative Law 39, 1991, p. 1 - 34. Cerca con Google

SALACUSE, J. W., SULLIVAN, N. P., « Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain », Harvard International Law Journal, p. 67-130. Cerca con Google

SALERNO, F., « Treaties Establishing Objective Regimes », in CANNIZZARO E., The Law of Treaties, Beyond the Vienna Convention, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 225 - 243. Cerca con Google

SANTULLI, C., « Observations sur les exceptions de recevabilitĂ© dans l’affaire du Mandat d’arrĂȘt du 11 avril 2000 (RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo c. Belgique) », Annuaire Français de Droit International, 2002, p. 257 – 328. Cerca con Google

SAUVANT, K. P. and NOLAN, M. D., « China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment and International Investment Law», Journal of International Economic Law, 2015, p. 893 – 934. Cerca con Google

SEPULVEDA-AMOR, B., LAWRY-WHITE, M., « State responsibility and the enforcement of arbitral awards », Arbitration International, 2017, p. 35 – 61. Cerca con Google

STIGLITZ, J. E., « Government Failure v. Market Failures: Principles of Regulation », in BALLEISEN E. J., MOSS A. D., Government and Markets, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 13 - 51. Cerca con Google

TAMS, C. J., HOFMANN, R., « International Investment Law: Situating an Exotic Special Regime within the Framework of General International Law », in TAMS, C. J., HOFMANN, R., International Investment Law and General International Law, Nomos 2011, p. 9 - 16. Cerca con Google

THOMAS, J.C., DHILLON, H. K, «The Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The ICSID Convention», Investment Treaties and the Review of Arbitration Awards, ICSID Review, 2017, p. 459 – 502. Cerca con Google

WAELDE, T.W. and WOUTERS, P. K., « State Responsibility in a liberalized world economy: “State privileged and Subnational Authorities” under the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty, an Analysis of article 22 and 23 », in Nederlands Yearbook of International Law, Volume XXVII, 1996, p. 143 - 191. Cerca con Google

WALDE, T., « Interpreting Investment Treaties experiences and examples », in BINDER, C., et al., International Investment for the 21st Century, Oxford University Press, 2009, p. 725 -781. Cerca con Google

WALTERS, L. G., « Fitting a Square Peg into a Round Hole: Do Res Judicata Challenges in International Arbitration Constitute Jurisdictional or Admissibility Problems? », Journal of International Arbitration, 2012, p. 651 – 680. Cerca con Google

WILLIAMS, M., « Adopting a competition law in China », in CASS D. Z., WILLIAMS B. G., BARKER G., China and the World Trading System: Entering in the New Millennium, Cambridge University Press, 2003. Cerca con Google

WITTICH, S., « The Limits of Party Autonomy in Investment Arbitration », in KNAHR, C., KOLLER, C., RECHBERGER, W., REINISCH, A., Investment and Commercial Arbitration – Similarities and Divergences, Eleven International Publishing, Utrecht, 2010, p. 47 -71. Cerca con Google

WOLFKE, K., « Treaties and Custom: Aspects of Interrelation », in JAN KLABBERS J., LEFEBER R., Essays on The Law of Treaties, Nihoff, The Hague, 1998, p. 31 - 39. Cerca con Google

ZIADÉ, N. G., News from ICSID International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Vol. 7, No. 2 Summer 1999, 2- 28. Cerca con Google

Ouvrages Spéciaux : (entreprises publiques). Cerca con Google

ALFORD, R. P., « Binding Sovereign Non-Signatories », Mealey’s International Arbitration Reports, 2004, p. 24 – 68. Cerca con Google

BACKER, L.C., « Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises, and the Chinese Experience », Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems, 2010-2011, p. 1 - 144. Cerca con Google

BADIA, A., « Attribution of Conduct of State-Owned Enterprises Based on the Control by the State », in BALTAG, C., ICSID Convention after 50 years Unsettled Issues, Kluwer Law International, p. 187 – 199. Cerca con Google

BARBIERI, M., « Sovereign wealth funds as protected investors under BITs and safeguard of the national security of host States », in SACERDOTI, G., ACCONCI, P., VALENTI, A., DE LUCA, A., General Interests of host States in International Investment Law, Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 141 – 149. Cerca con Google

BEUS, C., « Sovereign Wealth Funds in The ICSID - A New Approach to Standing », The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2014, p. 544 – 571. Cerca con Google

BLYSCHAK, P., « State Owned Enterprises and International Investment Treaties », Journal of International Law and International Relations, 2011, p. 1 – 52. Cerca con Google

BORTOLOTTI B. et PEROTTI E., « From Government to Regulatory Governance: Privatization and the Residual Role of the State», World Bank Research Observer, 2007, p. 1 - 14. Cerca con Google

BURGSTALLER, M., « Sovereign wealth funds and international investment law » in BROWN C. et MILES K., Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 163 – 186. Cerca con Google

BUTT, S., SHIVDASANI, A., STENDEVAD, C., WYMAN, A., « Sovereign Wealth Funds: A Growing Global Force in Corporate Finance », Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2008, p. 73 – 83. Cerca con Google

CHEN, S. Y., « Positioning Sovereign Wealth Funds As Claimants In Investor-State Arbitration », Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 2013, p. 299 – 328. Cerca con Google

DE STEFANO, C., « Adel A Hamadi Al Tamimi v. Sultanate of Oman: Attributing to Sovereigns the Conduct of State-Owned Enterprises: Towards Circumvention of the Accountability of States under International Investment Law», ICSID Review, 2017, p. 267 – 274. Cerca con Google

DONATO, A., « Public enterprises as policy instruments in the intersection of the EU and the WTO legal frameworks on state aid », Queen Mary Law Journal, 2016, p. 37 - 52. Cerca con Google

DUPUI, P. M., « Les émanations engagent-elles la responsabilité des Etats ? », EUI Working Paper LAW No. 2006/7, 2006. Cerca con Google

FELDMAN, M., « State Owned Enterprises as Claimant in International Investment Arbitration», ICSID Review, 2016, p. 24 - 35. Cerca con Google

FELDMAN, M., « The Standing of State-Owned Entities Under Investment Treaties », in K. P., SAUVANT, Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 616 – 637. Cerca con Google

GALLUS, N., « State Enterprises as Organs of the State and Bit Claims», Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2006, p. 761-779. Cerca con Google

KONRAD, S., « Protection of Non-Profit Organizations » in BUNGENBERG, M., GRIEBEL J., HOBE S., REINSCH, A., International Investment Law, A Handbook, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, 2015, p. 555 - 566. Cerca con Google

LOUVARIS, A., « Puissance Publique, Service Public et droit administrative : Ă©ternel retour ou fin de l’histoire ? », in DUFFAU J., LOUVARIS, A., et MELLA, E., MĂ©langes en l’honneur du professeur Alain-Serge Mescheriakoff, Bruylant, 2013, p. VIII-282 Cerca con Google

MENDENHALL, J. E., « Assessing Security Risks Posed by State-Owned Enterprises in the Context of International Investment Agreements », ICSID Review, 2016, p. 36 - 44. Cerca con Google

MOORTHY, V. K., « Malaysian National Oil Corporation - Is It a Government Instrumentality », International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1981, p. 638 – 659. Cerca con Google

NOUVEL, Y., « Les entitĂ©s paraĂ©tatiques dans la jurisprudence du CIRDI », in LEBEN C., Le Contentieux arbitral transnational relatif Ă  l’investissement, Anthemis – L.G.D.J., Paris, 2006, p. 25-51. Cerca con Google

PETERSMANN, E. U., « GATT Law on State Trading Enterprises: Critical Evaluation of Article XVII and Proposal for Reforms, in State Trading in the Twenty- First Century, Studies in International Economics », The World Trade Forum, p. 71 - 96. Cerca con Google

PIRNESS, A., OLFERT, M. R., PARTIDGE, M. D., FURTAN, H., « Assessing the Impact of State Trading Enterprises », International Economic Journal, 2012, p. 587 – 608. Cerca con Google

POULSEN, L. N. S., « States as Foreign Investors: Diplomatic Disputes and Legal Fictions », ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2016, p. 12 - 23. Cerca con Google

REEDT, B. J., « Sovereign Wealth Funds: The New Barbarians At The Gate? », Virginia Law and Business Review, 2009, p. 97- 137. Cerca con Google

ROMERO, E. S., « Are the States Liable for the Conduct of Their Instrumentalities ? », GAILLARD E., States Entities in International Arbitration, IAI series on International Arbitration, 2008, p. 31 - 54. Cerca con Google

ROSE, P., « Sovereigns as Shareholders », North Caroline Law Review, 2008, p. 84 - 149. Cerca con Google

SCHICHO, L., « Attribution and State Entities: Diverging Approaches in Investment Arbitration», The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2011, p. 283 – 298. Cerca con Google

SHAPIRO, D. M., GLOBERMAN, S., « The international Activities and impacts of State Owned Enterprises», in SAUVANT, K. P., Sovereign Investment: concerns and policy reactions, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 98 – 141. Cerca con Google

VIGIDAL, G., « Attribution in the WTO: The limits of “Sufficient Government Involvement», Journal of International Trade and Arbitration Law 2017, p. 133 - 160. Cerca con Google

Travaux des organisations internationales : Cerca con Google

Definition of Investor and Investment in International Investment Agreements International Investment Law: Understanding Concepts and Tracking Innovations, OECD 2008. Cerca con Google

DUGARD, M. J.R., Premier rapport sur la protection diplomatique, par, rapporteur spécial, DOCUMENT A/CN.4/506 et Add. 7 mars et 20 avril 2000. Cerca con Google

GAUKRODGER, D., « Foreign State Immunity and Foreign Government Controlled Investors», OECD Working Papers on International Investment, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2010/02. Cerca con Google

Groupe de travail des entreprises commerciales d’État, Liste Exemplative Des Relations Entre Pouvoirs Publics Et Entreprises Commerciales d’État et Des Types d’activitĂ©s Auxquelles Se Livrent Ces Entreprises, G/STR/4, 30 juillet 1999. Cerca con Google

INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP OF SWFS., « International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds’ generally Accepted Principles and Practices», “Santiago Principles”, 2008. Cerca con Google

KOWALSKI, P. et al., « State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications», OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 147, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2013. Cerca con Google

KOWALSKI, P. et al., State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 147, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2013. Cerca con Google

MĂ©morandum d’accord sur l’interprĂ©tation de l’article xvii de l’accord gĂ©nĂ©ral sur les tarifs douaniers et le commerce de 1994, p. 31 Cerca con Google

OCDE, Lignes directrices de l’OCDE sur la gouvernance des entreprises publiques, Édition 2015, OCDE, Paris. Cerca con Google

OECD, Corporate Governance of State Owned Enterprises: A survey of OECD Countries, 2005. Cerca con Google

OECD, Discussion Draft on the application of Tax Treaties to State Owned Entities Including SWFs, 25 November 2009. Cerca con Google

OECD, OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2015. Cerca con Google

OECD, OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital, Condensed Version, 2010. Cerca con Google

OECD, OECD working Paper on Insurance and Private Pensions, 1 January 2008. Cerca con Google

Rapport de la Commission du droit international Soixante – huitiĂšme session (2 mai - 10 juin et 4 juillet -12 aoĂ»t 2016), A/71/10 Nations Unies Rapport de la Commission du droit international Soixante - huitiĂšme session (2 mai - 10 juin et 4 juillet - 12 aoĂ»t 2016) AssemblĂ©e gĂ©nĂ©rale Documents officiels Soixante et onziĂšme session SupplĂ©ment n. 10 (A/71/10). Cerca con Google

Autres sources : Cerca con Google

PETERSON, L.E., « Eric Peterson, Oman’s Sovereign Wealth Fund is the Latest Claimant to try to hold a sovereign state – This time is Bulgaria – Liable for Losses in a Bank Failure», IAI reporter, Oct. 2015. Cerca con Google

BUTT, S., et A. SHIVDASANI., « Sovereign Wealth Fund: A Growing Global Force in Corporate Finance», Appl. Corp Finance, 2008, p. 73 – 83. Cerca con Google

DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP., « Suing State-Controlled Entities in Investment Arbitration: The Demise of the “Presumption of Statehood”? », Arbitration Quarterly, 2014, p. 1 - 22. Cerca con Google

Traités : Cerca con Google

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Cerca con Google

Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signé le 04 mars 1994, entré en vigueur 16 novembre 1996. Cerca con Google

Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Romania Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment, Signed May 28, 1992; Entered into Force January 15, 1994. Cerca con Google

FRANCE: Cerca con Google

Accord entre le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique française et le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique islamique d’Iran sur l’encouragement et la protection rĂ©ciproques des investissements signĂ© le 12 mai 2003, entrĂ©e en vigueur le 12 novembre 2004. Cerca con Google

Accord entre la RĂ©publique française et l’État du KoweĂŻt sur l’encouragement et la protection rĂ©ciproques des investissements, signĂ© Ă  Paris le 27 septembre 1989, entrĂ©e en vigueur le 16 mai 1991. Cerca con Google

Accord entre le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique Française et le Gouvernement du Royaume d’Arabie Saoudite sur l’encouragement et la protection rĂ©ciproques des investissements, signĂ© le 26 juin 2002 et entrĂ© en vigueur le 18 mars 2004 Cerca con Google

Accord entre le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique française et le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique arabe du YĂ©men sur l’encouragement et la protection des investissements (ensemble deux Ă©changes de lettres), signĂ© le 27 avril 1984, entrĂ©e en vigueur 19 juillet 1991. Cerca con Google

Accord entre le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique Française et le Gouvernement de la RĂ©publique Islamique d’Iran sur l’encouragement et la protection rĂ©ciproques des investissements, signĂ© le 12 mai 2003, entrĂ©e en vigueur le 12 novembre 2004. Cerca con Google

UNITED KINGDOM: Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of the United Arab Emirates and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on the 08th of December 1992 entered into force on the 15th of December 1993. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Republic of Senegal and The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on the 07 May 1980 entered into force on the 9 of February 1984. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Republic of Panama and The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on the 7 October 1983 and entered into force on the 7 november 1985. Cerca con Google

CANADA: Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Poland for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signed on the 06th of April 1990 entered into force on the 22th of November 1990. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the URSS (now binds the Russian Federation) for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment Signed on the 20th of November 1989 entered into force on the 27th of June 1991. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Czech and Slovack federal Republic for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signed on the 15th of November 1990 and entered into force on the 09 March 1992. (now terminated). Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Argentina for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signed on the 05th of November 1991, entered into force on the 29th of April 1993. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Hungary for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment (1993). Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Eastern Uruguay for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment signed on the 29/10/1997 signed on the 02/06/1999), Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Trinitad and Tobago for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment signed on the 11 September 1995 and entered into force on the 08 July 1996. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Republic of Philipppines for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment signed on the 10th of November 1995 and entered into force on the 1st of November 1996 Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Armenia for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment signed on the 08th of May 1997 and entered into force on the 29 of March 1999; Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Panama for the Promotion and the Reciprocal Protection of Investment, signed on the 12 September 1996 et entered into force on the 13th February 1998. Cerca con Google

UNITED KINGDOM: Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Government of the United Arab Emirates and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on the 08th of December 1992 entered into force on the 15th of December 1993. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Republic of Senegal and The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed on the 07 May 1980 entered into force on the 9th of February 1984. Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Republic of Panama and The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, signed le 7 October 1983 et entered into force on the 7th of November 1985. Cerca con Google

CHINA: Cerca con Google

Agreement between the Governments of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the State of Qatar Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, 09th April 1999, entered into force on the 1st of April 2000. Cerca con Google

TRAITES MULITILATERAUX: Cerca con Google

North American Free Trade Agreement, signed on the 17th of December 1992, ratified on the 1st of January 1994 Cerca con Google

Traité sur la Charte européenne, signé en décembre 1994, entré en vigueur en avril 1998. Cerca con Google

ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement, an agreement signed by ten ASEAN countries on the 26th of February 26, 2009. Cerca con Google

Lois nationales: Cerca con Google

Legislation on Foreign Relations Through 2002 – As amended - 87–164 CC, Sec. 231. Creation, Purpose and Policy Cerca con Google

Ministero dell’Economia et delle Finanze, Decreto del 22 gennaio 2010, Autorizzazione alla Cassa depositi e prestiti S.p.A. a fornire, alle banche italiane e alle succursali di banche estere comunitarie ed extracomunitarie operanti in Italia, la provvista per effettuare operazioni di finanziamento a sostegno dell’internazionalizzazione delle imprese, G.U. n. 82 del 9 – 4 – 2010. Cerca con Google

Circular of the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation and China Export Credit Insurance Corporation on Issues Concerning Further Promoting Export Credit Insurance, Wai Jing Mao Ji Cai Han, No. 521 October 29, 2002. Cerca con Google

Legislation on Foreign Relations Through 2002 – As amended – 87 – 164 CC, Sec. 231. Cerca con Google

Republic of South Africa, Government Gazette, Vol. 448, Cape Town, 4 October 2002, No. 23911. Cerca con Google

Export and Investment Guarantees Act, Act wholly in force at 23 October 1991. Cerca con Google

Nueva Ley DOF 02-01-1992 1 de 3, Ley Sobre la CelebraciĂłn de Tratados Texto Vigente, Nueva Ley publicada en el Diario Oficial de la FederaciĂłn, el 2 de enero de 1992, art. 2. Cerca con Google

Federal Law No. 317-FZ on the State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom, article 14, alinéa 2. Cerca con Google

Affaires : Cerca con Google

Cour internationale de Justice : Cerca con Google

ActivitĂ©s militaires et paramilitaires au Nicaragua et contre celui-ci (Nicaragua c. Etats-Unis d’AmĂ©rique), fond, ArrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 1986, p. 14. Cerca con Google

Affaire Ambatielos (fond : obligation arbitrage), ArrĂȘt du 19 mai 1953, C.I.J. Recueil 1953, p. 10. Cerca con Google

Affaire de l’Interhandel (Suisse c. Etats-Unis d'AmĂ©rique), arrĂȘt, du 21 mars 1959, C.I.J., Recueil 1959, p. 6. Cerca con Google

Affaire du Cameroun Septentrional (Cameroun c. Royaume- Unie, Exceptions prĂ©liminaires), ArrĂȘt du 2 dĂ©cembre 1963, C.I.J., Recueil 1963, p. 15, Opinion sĂ©parĂ©e du juge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice. Cerca con Google

Affaire du Detroit de Corfou, ArrĂȘt du 9 avril 1949, C.I J. Recueil 1949, p. 4. Cerca con Google

Affaire relative Ă  certains emprunts norvĂ©giens, ArrĂȘt du 6 juillet 1957, C.I.J., Recueil 1957, p. 9. Cerca con Google

Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (RĂ©publique de GuinĂ©e c. RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo), exceptions prĂ©liminaires, arrĂȘt, C.I.J., Recueil 2007, p. 582. Cerca con Google

Application de la convention pour la prĂ©vention et la rĂ©pression du crime de gĂ©nocide (Bosnie-HerzĂ©govine c. Serbie-et-MontĂ©nĂ©gro), ArrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 2007, p. 43. Cerca con Google

Affaire du Temple de PrĂ©ah VihĂ©ar (Cambodge c. ThaĂŻlande), Fond, ArrĂȘt du 15 juin 1962, C.I.J., Recueil, 1962, p. 6. Cerca con Google

Barcelona - Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, exceptions prĂ©liminaires, arrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 1964, p. 4. Cerca con Google

Demande en interprĂ©tation de l’arrĂȘt du 11 juin 1998 en l’Affaire de la FrontiĂšre terrestre et maritime entre le Cameroun et le NigĂ©ria (Cameroun c. NigĂ©ria), exceptions prĂ©liminaires, arrĂȘt, C.I.J., Recueil 1999, p. 31. Cerca con Google

LicĂ©itĂ© de l’emploi de la force (Serbie-et-MontĂ©nĂ©gro c. Belgique), exceptions prĂ©liminaires, arrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 2004, p. 279. Cerca con Google

Mandat d’arrĂȘt du 11 avril 2000 (RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo c. Belgique), arrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 2002, p. 3, Opinion Individuelle Commune de M. Higgins, M. Koloijmans et M. Buergelnthal. Cerca con Google

Certaines questions concernant l’entraide judiciaire en matiĂšre pĂ©nale (Djibouti c. France), arrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 2008, p. 177. Cerca con Google

Personnel diplomatique et consulaire des Etats-Unis Ă  TĂ©hĂ©ran, (Etats - Unis d’AmĂ©rique c. RĂ©publique Islamique d’Iran.), arrĂȘt, C.I.J., Recueil 1980, p. 3. Cerca con Google

Plates-formes pĂ©troliĂšres (RĂ©publique islamique d’Iran c. Etats- Unis d’AmĂ©rique), arrĂȘt, C.I.J. Recueil 2003, p. 161. Cerca con Google

Projet GabCikovo-Nagymaros (Hongrie c. Slovaquie), arrĂȘt, C.I.J., Recueil 1997, p. 7. Cerca con Google

Question De La DĂ©limitation Du Plateau Continental Entre Le Nicaragua Et La Colombie Au-DelĂ  De 200 Milles Marins De La CĂŽte Nicaraguayenne (Nicaragua c. Colombie), Exceptions PrĂ©liminaires, arrĂȘt du 17 Mars 2016. Cerca con Google

Cour permanente de justice internationale : Cerca con Google

Affaire Des Concessions Mavrommatis En Palestine Publications of The Permanent Court of International Justice. SĂ©ries A – At, August 30 th, 1924 Cerca con Google

Affaire Des Zones Franches De La Haute-Savoie Et Du Pays De Gex Ordonnances, (France c. Suisse), PC.I.J. SĂ©ries A no. 22, du 19 Aout 1929. Cerca con Google

Appels Contre Certains Jugements Du Tribunal Arbitral Mixte Hungaro-Tchécoslovaque, Séries A/B, n. 61, 1933 P.C.I.J. (sert. A/B) No. 6. Cerca con Google

Certains intĂ©rĂȘts allemands en Haute-SilĂ©sie polonaise (fond) (Allemagne c. Pologne), ArrĂȘt du 25 mai 1926, SĂ©rie A No. 7. Cerca con Google

Décrets de nationalité promulgués en Tunisie et au Maroc, (France c. Royaume Uni), Avis consultatif du 7 février 1923, Série B, n. 4. Cerca con Google

Emprunts brĂ©siliens (France c. Brazil), ArrĂȘt du 12 juillet 1929, SĂ©rie A No. 21. Cerca con Google

InterprĂ©tation de l’Accord grĂ©co-turc du 1er dĂ©cembre 1926, C.P.I.J., SĂ©rie B, n. 16 Cerca con Google

Juridiction territoriale de la Commission internationale de l’Oder SĂ©rie A, n. 23. Cerca con Google

Société commerciale de Belgique, P.C.I.J.,1939, Séries A/B, No. 78 Cerca con Google

Centre international pour le rÚglement des différends relatifs aux investissements : Cerca con Google

Adel A Hamadi Al Tamimi v. Sultanate Of Oman, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/33, Award, November 3 2015. Cerca con Google

Aguas del Tunari, S.A. v. Republic of Bolivia, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, October 21, 2005. Cerca con Google

Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. And A.S. Baltoil v. The Republic of Estonia ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award, June 25, 2001. Cerca con Google

Antoine Abou Lahoud et Leila Bounafeh-Abou Lahoud v. La République Démocratique Du Congo, Affaire CIRDI Arb/10/4, Sentence, 7 février 2014. Cerca con Google

Asian Agricultural Products Ltd v. Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, June 27, 1990. Cerca con Google

Azurix Corp. and The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, July 14, 2006. Cerca con Google

Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Annulment Proceeding, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, September 1, 2009. Cerca con Google

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.S. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, November 14, 2005. Cerca con Google

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A.ƞ. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, August 27, 2009. Cerca con Google

Beijing Urban Construction Group Co. Ltd. v. Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/30, Decision on Jurisdiction, 31 May 2017. Cerca con Google

Bosh International, Inc and B & P Ltd Foreign Investments Enterprise v. Ukraine ICSID Case No ARB/08/11, Award, October 25, 2012. Cerca con Google

Cambodia Power Company v. Kingdom of Cambodia Electricité du Cambodge, ICSID CASE NO. ARB/09/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 March 2011. Cerca con Google

Cambodia Power Company v. Kingdom of Cambodia Electricité du Cambodge, ICSID CASE NO. ARB/09/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 March 2011. Cerca con Google

Caratube International Oil Company LLP and Mr. Devincci Salah Hourani v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/13, Award, September 27, 2017. Cerca con Google

CDC Group PLC v. Republic of the Seychelles, ICSID Case No. ARB/ 02/14, Award, December 17, 2003. Cerca con Google

Ceskoslovenska Obschodni Banka, A.S. v. The Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, May 24, 1999 Cerca con Google

City Oriente Limited v. The Republic of Ecuador Empresa Estatal PetrĂłleos del Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/21, Decision on provisional measures, November 19, 2007 - (DĂ©cret de prise de notes sur le dĂ©sistement de l’instance 12 septembre 2008). Cerca con Google

CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Decision on objections to jurisdiction of July 17, 2003, 42 ILM 788, 2003. Cerca con Google

CompañiĂĄ de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3, Decision on the Argentine Republic’s Request for Annulment of the Award, August 20, 2007 Cerca con Google

Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. & Compagnie Générale des Eaux v. Argentine Republic, (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3) Award, 21 November 2000. Cerca con Google

Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. & Compagnie Générale des Eaux v. Argentine Republic, (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3), Decision on Annulment, July 3, 2002 Cerca con Google

Conoco Phillips Petrouzata B.V., Conoco Phillips Hamaca B.V. Conoco Phillips Gulf of Paria B.V. and Conoco Phillips Company v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30, Decision on Respondent’s Request for Reconsideration, March 10, 2014. Cerca con Google

Consortium RFCC v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/6, Award, December 22, 2003. Cerca con Google

Consortium RFCC v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/6, Decision on Jurisdiction, July 16, 2001. Cerca con Google

Consorzio Groupement L.E.S.I. – Dipenta v. People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/08, Decision on Jurisdiction, January 10, 2005. Cerca con Google

Continental Casualty Company v. Argentina, ICISD Case No. ARB/03/09, Decision on Jurisdiction, April 27, 2006. Cerca con Google

Deutsche Bank AG v. Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/02, Award, October 31, 2012. Cerca con Google

EDF (Services) Limited v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/13, Award, October 8, 2009. Cerca con Google

Electrabel S.A. v. Hungary, ICSID Case NO. ARB/07/19, Award, November 25, 2015. Cerca con Google

Electrabel S.A. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, November 30, 2012. Cerca con Google

Emilio AgustĂ­n Maffezini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case, ARB/97/7, Decision on Jurisdiction January 25, 2000. Cerca con Google

Emilio Agustin Maffezzini v. The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case, ARB/97/7, Final Award, November 13, 2000. Cerca con Google

Garanti Koza LLP v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/20, Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, July 23, 2013. Cerca con Google

Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v. Republic of Ghana, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24, Award, June 18, 2010. Cerca con Google

Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d. v. Republic of Slovenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/24, Decision on the Treaty Interpretation Issue, June 12, 2009. Cerca con Google

İçkale İnƟaat Limited ƞirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB /10/24, Award, March 8, 2016. Cerca con Google

Impregilo S.P.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/3 Decision on Jurisdiction, April 22, 2005. Cerca con Google

Jan de Nul N.V. Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, June 16, 2006. Cerca con Google

Jan de Nul N.V. Dredging International N.V. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13 Award, November 6, 2008. Cerca con Google

Joy Mining Machinery Ltd. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award, August 6 2004. Cerca con Google

Malaysian Historical Salvors, SDN, BHD v. The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10 del 17 maggio 2007. Cerca con Google

Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, October 12, 2005. Cerca con Google

PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd. v. Independent State of Papua New Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/33, Decision on Respondent’s Objections under Rule 41(5), October 28, 2014. Cerca con Google

PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd. v. Independent State of Papua New Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/33, Decision on the Claimant’s Request for Provisional Measures January 21, 2015. Cerca con Google

PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd. v. Independent State of Papua New Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/33, Award, May 5 2015. Cerca con Google

Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomikasyon Hizmetleri AS v. Kazakhstan, ICSID Case ARB/05/16, Award., July 21, 2008. Cerca con Google

Saipem S.p.A. v. The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07, Award, June 30 2009. Cerca con Google

Saipem S.p.A. v. The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/07, Decision on Jurisdiction and Recommendation on Provisional Measures, March 21, 2007. Cerca con Google

Salini Construttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, July 23, 2001. Cerca con Google

Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, November 9, 2004. Cerca con Google

Sempra Energy International, Camuzzi International, S.A. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case, Case No. ARB/03/02, Decision on objections to jurisdiction, para. 145 Cerca con Google

Talta-Trading e Marketing Sociedade Unipessoal LDA v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/26, Award, January 29, 2016. Cerca con Google

Teinver S.A., Transportes de CercanĂ­as S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, December 21, 2012 Cerca con Google

Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, September 13, 2006. Cerca con Google

Toto Costruzioni Generali S.P.A. v. The Republic of Lebanon, ICSID Case No. ARB/07112, Decision on Jurisdiction, September 11, 2009. Cerca con Google

Toto Costruzioni Generali S.P.A. v. The Republic of Lebanon, ICSID Case No. ARB/07112, Award, June 7, 2012. Cerca con Google

Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands B.V. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/28, Application for annulment of the Tribunal's Award, July 3, 2014. Cerca con Google

Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/28, Decision on Bifurcated Jurisdictional Issue, March 5, 2013. Cerca con Google

Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/28, Award, March 10, 2014 Cerca con Google

Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands B.V. v. Republic of Turkey, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/28, Decision on Annulment, December 30, 2015. Cerca con Google

Vacuum Salt Limited v. Government of the Republic of Ghana, ICSID Case No. ARB/92/1, Award, February, 16 February, 1994. Cerca con Google

Waste Management Inc. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/3, April 30, 2004. Cerca con Google

Wena Hotels Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, December 8, 2000. Cerca con Google

Fedax NV v. Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, July 11, 1997. Cerca con Google

World Duty Free Company Limited and The Republic of Kenya, (ICSID) Case No. (ARB/00/7), Award, 4 October 2006. Cerca con Google

Chambre de commerce internationale (ICC) : Cerca con Google

Bridas v. Turkmenistan, ICC Case No 9151, Interim Award., June 8, 1999. Cerca con Google

Capital India Power Mauritius I and Energy Enterprises (Mauritius) Company v. India, Award, ICC Case No 12913/MS, IIC 43, International Court of Arbitration. 2005 Cerca con Google

CCI, Affaire non publié, Kaliningrad v. Lithuania, Cerca con Google

CCI, affaire n. 6474 du 1992 Cerca con Google

CCI, affaire n. 7154 du 1993 Cerca con Google

CCI, Affaire n. 8385 du 1995 Cerca con Google

CCI, Affaire n. 8910 du 1998 Cerca con Google

CCI, Affaire n. 9762 du 2001 Cerca con Google

CCI, affaire n. 3383, 1979 Cerca con Google

CCI, affaires n. 2475 et n. 2762 du 1977 Cerca con Google

CCI, affaire n. 13509, 2006 Cerca con Google

The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC): Cerca con Google

Limited Liability Company AMTO v. Republic of Ukraine, SCC Arbitration n. 80/2005, March 26 2008. Cerca con Google

Renta 4 S.V.S.A, Ahorro CorporaciĂłn Emergentes F.I., Ahorro CorporaciĂłn Eurofondo F.I., Rovime Inversiones SICAV S.A., Quasar de Valors SICAV S.A., Orgor de Valores SICAV S.A., GBI 9000 SICAV S.A. v. The Russian Federation, S.C.C. No. 24/2007, Award on Preliminary Objections, 20 March 2009 Cerca con Google

State Enterprise “Energorynok” v. The Republic of Moldova, S.C.C. Arbitration V 2012/175, Final Award, 29 January 2015 Cerca con Google

Affaires US-IRAN-CLAIM TRIBUNAL Cerca con Google

Schering Corporation v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Case no. 38, Award 122-38-3, Award no. 122-38-3, 23 April 1984, in PIRRIE S. R., ARNOLD J. S., LAUTERPACHT E., Iran – U.S. Claims Tribunals Reports 5 1984 - 1, Cambridge Grotius Publications Limited, 1985. Cerca con Google

United States v. Iran, Case A-16, 5 in PIRRIE S. R., ARNOLD J. S., LAUTERPACHT E., Iran – U.S. Claims Tribunals Reports 57 at. 71, 1984 - 1, Cambridge Grotius Publications Limited, 1985. Cerca con Google

AD HOC: Cerca con Google

Alabama Claims (United States v. Britain), I More, Arbitrations, 495-682. (1872). Cerca con Google

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, Award on Jurisdiction, November 22, 2002 Cerca con Google

Sergei Paushok CJSC Golden East Company CJSC Vostokneftegaz Company v. The Government of Mongolia, Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, UNCITRAL, April 28, 2011. Cerca con Google

United States v. Iran, Case A-16, 5 Iran-US Claims Tribunals Reports 57. Cerca con Google

Haji Mohamend Harrej, (Tanger Horses), 2 UNRIAA, 1924. Cerca con Google

O.M.C. : Cerca con Google

Canada – Certaines mesures affectant le secteur de la production d’énergie renouvelable, Canada – mesures relatives au programme de tarifs de rachat garantis, WT/DS412/R, WT/DS426/R, Rapport du Groupe spĂ©cial, 19 dĂ©cembre 2012. Cerca con Google

Canada – Mesures concernant les exportations de blĂ© et le traitement des grains importĂ©s, WT/DS276/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 30 AoĂ»t 2004. Cerca con Google

Canada – Mesures concernant les exportations de blĂ© et le traitement des grains importĂ©s, WT/DS276/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 30 aoĂ»t 2004. Cerca con Google

Canada – Mesures visant l’importation de lait et l’exportation de produits laitiers, WT/DS103/AB/R WT/DS113/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’Appel, 13 octobre 1999. Cerca con Google

CommunautĂ©s EuropĂ©ennes – Mesures affectant l’approbation et la commercialisation des produits biotechnologiques, WT/DS291/R WT/DS292/R WT/DS293/R, Rapport du Panel, 29 Septembre 2006. Cerca con Google

CommunautĂ©s EuropĂ©ennes - Mesures affectant l’importation de certains produits provenant de volailles, WT/DS69/R Rapport du groupe spĂ©cial, 12 mars 1998. Cerca con Google

CommunautĂ©s EuropĂ©ennes - RĂ©gime applicable Ă  l’importation, Ă  la vente et Ă  la distribution des bananes, WT/DS27/AB/R - AB-1997-3 - Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 26 novembre 2008. Cerca con Google

CommunautĂ©s EuropĂ©ennes – RĂ©gime applicable Ă  l’importation, Ă  la vente et Ă  la distribution des bananes, WT/DS27/AB/R - Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 9 septembre 1997. Cerca con Google

États-Unis – Droits antidumping et droits compensateurs dĂ©finitifs visant certains produits en provenance de Chine, WT/DS379/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 11 mars 2011. Cerca con Google

États-Unis – Droits antidumping et droits compensateurs dĂ©finitifs visant certains produits en provenance de Chine, WT/DS379/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 11 mars 2011. Cerca con Google

États-Unis – Mesures compensatoires visant certains produits plats en acier au carbone laminĂ©s Ă  chaud en provenance d’Inde, Ab-2014-7, WT/DS436/AB/R Rapport de l’organe d’appel, 8 dĂ©cembre 2014. Cerca con Google

États-Unis – RĂ©examen Ă  l'extinction des droits antidumping appliquĂ©s aux produits plats en acier au carbone traitĂ© contre la corrosion en provenance du Japon, WT/DS244/AB/R, Rapport de l’Organe d’appel, 15 dĂ©cembre 2003. Cerca con Google

Inde – Mesures Concernant Le Secteur Automobile Rapport Du Groupe SpĂ©cial WT/DS146/R WT/DS175/R 21 dĂ©cembre 2001 Cerca con Google

Japon - Mesures affectant les pellicules et papiers photographiques destinés aux consommateurs WT/DS44/R, Rapport du Groupe spécial, 31 mars 1998. Cerca con Google

Japon - Restrictions l’importation de certains produits agricoles rapport du groupe spĂ©cial adoptĂ©, le 2 fĂ©vrier 1988 (L/6253 - 35s/180), VI.43. Cerca con Google

Mexique – EnquĂȘte antidumping concernant le sirop de maĂŻs Ă  haute teneur en fructose (shtf) en provenance des Etats-Unis, WT/DS132/AB/RW, 22 octobre 2001. Cerca con Google

Peru – Additional duty on imports of certain agricultural products, AB-2015-3, WT/DS457/AB/R, Report of the Appellate Body, 20 July 2015 Cerca con Google

Spain - Measures concerning domestic sale of soybean oil, Recourse to Article XXIII: 2 by the United States (L/5142). Cerca con Google

ITLOS: Cerca con Google

Mox Plant Case, Ireland v. United Kingdom, Provisional Measures, Order of 3 December 2001, ITLOS Reports 95, 2001. Cerca con Google

Jurisprudence national: Cerca con Google

Royaume Unie Cerca con Google

AIG Capital Partners, Inc., CJSC Tema Real Estate Company vs The Republic of Kazakhstan, Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, Case No. 2004/536, October 20 Cerca con Google

G. Capital Partners, Inc, CJSC Tema Real Estate Company v. The Republic of Kazakhstan, Case No: 2004/536, Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL, 20 10 2005. Cerca con Google

AIC Limited v. Federal Government of Nigeria and Others, 2003, England, High Court, Queen’s Bench Division. 13 June 2003, 2005). Cerca con Google

France Cerca con Google

Affaire S.O.N.A.T.R.A.C.H., Cour de cassation, Chambre civile 1 84-13.605. (1 octobre 1985). Cerca con Google

Benvenuti and Bonfant v. Banque Commerciale Congolaise, Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record