Go to the content. | Move to the navigation | Go to the site search | Go to the menu | Contacts | Accessibility

| Create Account

Zorzi, Virginia (2018) The Communication of Science and Technology in Online Newspapers: a Multidimensional Perspective. [Ph.D. thesis]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Preview
PDF Document (Tesi dottorato Virginia Zorzi)
4Mb

Abstract (italian or english)

Communicating science and technology, both at specialised and non specialised levels, is an important component in the production and circulation of technoscientific knowledge and practices. Newspapers – both in their printed and online versions – are regarded as an important and generally reliable source of scientific and technological information for the general public. The study investigates the communication of science and technology in UK and US online newspapers, focusing on the language of articles published in newspaper sections dealing with science and technology and contextualising it within the newspaper genre as a whole. Different methods of analysis – involving both quantitative and qualitative aspects – were combined and applied on a corpus of articles published in four UK and US newspapers between 2014 and 2016. The Multidimensional Analysis (MDA), originally proposed by Biber to analyse genre and register variation in English, was taken as the main methodological reference for the present study. Thus, specific software tools were created and combined with existing ones to perform a new version of the MDA on the news corpus, partly adapting it to the present research needs. Based on the analysis of a set of linguistic features spanning different levels of language – namely, grammar, syntax, and lexis – this method enabled a statistically-based description of the corpus and its internal linguistic variation, with a focus on articles reporting on science and technology. The aim was to find out whether any linguistic elements distinguished the communication of science and technology from news published in other newspaper sections. A qualitative analysis on a set of texts from the corpus contributed to the interpretation of the statistical results, and was useful in relating the linguistic patterns identified as relevant to their possible underlying communicative functions. As a result, four main patterns of variation, referred to as ‘dimensions’, emerged. They concern the extent of informational purposes, the use of speech attribution and reporting structures, the presence of explanation and argumentation, and the type of time reference of a text. Thus, each text of the corpus could be described as a particular combination of these four different dimensions (hence the term Multidimensional Analysis). Subsequently, a lexical content analysis was performed on the corpus, and in particular on articles about science and technology, with the aim of identifying the main themes characterising these texts, as well as the semantic relations connecting different themes. The lexical analysis thus provided some useful insights into the public representation of science and technology in the analysed newspapers. Overall, the results revealed that some communicative features slightly but significantly distinguish science and technology news from groups of articles published in different newspaper sections. At the same time, articles reporting on science and technology share some communicative features with most news from other sections, thus pointing to a degree of homogeneity within the news genre. The findings from the linguistic analysis were further commented on and connected to sociological theories on the social construction and public communication of science and technology, thus laying the basis for further research on the role and construction of technoscientific knowledge in the mass media.


Statistiche Download
EPrint type:Ph.D. thesis
Tutor:Musacchio , M. T.
Supervisor:Neresini, F.
Ph.D. course:Ciclo 31 > Corsi 31 > SCIENZE LINGUISTICHE, FILOLOGICHE E LETTERARIE
Data di deposito della tesi:03 May 2019
Anno di Pubblicazione:2018
Key Words:Discourse Analysis - Corpus Linguistics - Science and Technology Studies - Multidimensional analysis
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 10 - Scienze dell'antichità, filologico-letterarie e storico-artistiche > L-LIN/12 Lingua e traduzione - Lingua inglese
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Letterari
Codice ID:11895
Depositato il:05 Nov 2019 17:12
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

Aitchison, J., & Lewis, D. M. (Eds.). (2003). New Media Language. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Al‐Surmi Mansoor. (2012). Authenticity and TV Shows: A Multidimensional Analysis Perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 671–694. Cerca con Google

Angouri, J. (2010). Quantitative, Qualitative or Both? Combining Methods in Linguistic Research. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics (pp. 29–45). London: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Anthony, L. (2004). Antconc: A Learner and Classroom Friendly, Multi-Platform Corpus Analysis Toolkit. In Proceedings of IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning (pp. 7–13). Cerca con Google

Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.7). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Asención-Delaney, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A Multidimensional Analysis of a Written L2 Spanish Corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 299–322. Cerca con Google

Baker, P. (2009). The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 312–337. Cerca con Google

Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (2016). Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. New York, London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the Uk Press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306. Cerca con Google

Baker, P., & Levon, E. (2015). Picking the Right Cherries? A Comparison of Corpus-Based and Qualitative Analyses of News Articles About Masculinity. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 221–236. Cerca con Google

Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2005). A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Un and Newspaper Texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 197–226. Cerca con Google

Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Galbraith, J., & Moustaki, I. (2008). Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group. Cerca con Google

Basilevsky, A. (1994). Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods: Theory and Applications. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Cerca con Google

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News Discourse. New York, London: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cerca con Google

Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J., & Jones, R. H. (2008). Approaches to Discourse Analysis. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 1–18). London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Bianucci, P. (2008). Te lo dico con parole tue. Bologna: Zanichelli. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (1989). A Typology of English Texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–44. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (2006). University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers (Vol. 23). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Cerca con Google

Biber, D. (2009). Multi-Dimensional Approaches. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: an International Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 822–855). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Cerca con Google

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2008). Spoken and Written Register Variation in Spanish: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1–37. Cerca con Google

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. Cerca con Google

Bielsa, E., & Bassnett, S. (2009). Translation in Global News. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Blum, D., Knudson, M., Dunwoody, S., Finkbeiner, A., Levy Guyer, R., & Wilkes, J. (2006). Writing Well about Science: Techniques from Teachers of Science Writing. In D. Blum, M. Knudson, & R. M. Henig (Eds.), A Field Guide for Science Writers (Second Edition, pp. 26–33). New York: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Bondi, M. (2010). Perspectives on Keywords and Keyness: An Introduction. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Brand, C. (2008). Lexical Processes in Scientific Discourse Popularisation: A Corpus-Linguistic Study of the Sars Coverage. Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Březina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Brossard, D. (2013). New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(Suppl 3), 14096–14101. Cerca con Google

Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Science, New Media, and the Public. Science, 339(6115), 40–41. Cerca con Google

Brown, J. D. (2004). Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: Scope, Characteristics, and Standards. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 476–500). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Brown, N. (1999). Xenotransplantation: Normalizing Disgust. Science as Culture, 8(3), 327–355. Cerca con Google

Bucchi, M. (2004). Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Bucchi, M. (2008). Of Deficits, Deviations and Dialogues: Theories of Public Communication of Science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 71–90). New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2008). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge. Cerca con Google

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2016). Science Communication and Science in Society: A Conceptual Review in Ten Keywords. Tecnoscienza (Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies), 7(2), 151–168. Cerca con Google

Bybee, J. L., & Fleischman, S. (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing. Cerca con Google

Calsamiglia, H. (2003). Popularization Discourse. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 139–146. Cerca con Google

Calsamiglia, H., & López Ferrero, C. L. (2003). Role and Position of Scientific Voices: Reported Speech in the Media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 147–173. Cerca con Google

Calsamiglia, H., & van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Popularization Discourse and Knowledge About the Genome. Discourse & Society, 15(4), 369–389. Cerca con Google

Carrada, G. (2005). Comunicare la scienza. Milano: Sironi. Cerca con Google

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: a Comprehensive Guide; Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Cerca con Google

Castell, S., Charlton, A., Clemence, M., Pettigrew, N., Pope, S., Quigley, A., Navin Shah, J., Silman, T. (2014). Public Attitudes to Science 2014: Main Report. UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), now part of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-attitudes-to-science-2014 (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Cave, D. (2018, August 23). Australia Wilts From Climate Change. Why Can’t Its Politicians Act? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/world/australia/australia-climate-change-malcolm-turnbull.html (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

CERN | Accelerating science. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://home.cern/ (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Chafe, W. L. (1980). The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of a Narrative. In W. L. Chafe (Ed.), The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Cerca con Google

Cloître, M., & Shinn, T. (1985). Expository Practice: Social, Cognitive and Epistemological Linkages. In T. Shinn & R. Whitley (Eds.), Expository Science. Forms and Functions of Popularization (pp. 31–60). Dordrecht: Reidel. Cerca con Google

Collins, R. (1981). On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014. Cerca con Google

Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2003). Linguistic Dimensions of Direct Mail Letters. In P. Letsyna & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use (pp. 72–86). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi. Cerca con Google

Cooke, M. (Ed.). (2012). Tell It Like It Is? Science, Society and the Ivory Tower. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Cooter, R., & Pumfrey, S. (1994). Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture. History of Science, 32(3), 237–267. Cerca con Google

Corcoran, F., & Fahy, D. (2009). Exploring the European Elite Sphere: The Role of the Financial Times. Journalism Studies, 10(1), 100–113. Cerca con Google

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. Cerca con Google

Cotter, C. (2015). Discourse and Media. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 416–436). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Crookes, G. (1990). The Utterance, and Other Basic Units for Second Language Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 183–199. Cerca con Google

Dahl, T. (2015). Contested Science in the Media: Linguistic Traces of News Writers’ Framing Activity. Written Communication, 32(1), 39–65. Cerca con Google

Davies, A., & Elder, C. (2004). General Introduction-Applied Linguistics: Subject to Discipline? In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Devlin, H. (2018, August 15). Hottest of ‘Ultra-Hot’ Planets Is so Hot Its Air Contains Vaporised Metal. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/aug/15/hottest-of-ultra-hot-planets-is-so-hot-its-air-contains-vaporised-metal (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

DiMaggio, P., Nag, M., & Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting Affinities Between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of Us Government Arts Funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570–606. Cerca con Google

DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mîndrilă, D. (2009). Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11. Cerca con Google

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-capitalist Society. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Ducrot, O., & Todorov, T. (1972). Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Cerca con Google

Duff, P. A. (2006). Beyond Generalizability: Contextualization, Complexity, and Credibility in Applied Linguistics Research. In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. A. Chapelle, & P. A. Duff (Eds.), Inference and Generalizability in Applied Linguistics: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 65–96). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Dunwoody, S. (2008). Science Journalism. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 15–26). London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Edge, D. (1995). Reinventing the Wheel. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 3–24). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Egbert, J. (2015). Publication Type and Discipline Variation in Published Academic Writing: Investigating Statistical Interaction in Corpus Data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. Cerca con Google

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. Cerca con Google

ERC: European Research Council. (n.d.). Retrieved 29 September 2018, from https://erc.europa.eu/ Vai! Cerca con Google

European Research Council. (2018, July 19). Can Communication Improve Your Science? The European Research Council Magazine. Retrieved from https://erc.europa.eu/news-events/magazine/can-communication-improve-your-science (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

European Union. (2010). Special Eurobarometer 340: ‘Science and Technology’-Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_340_en.pdf (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

European Union. (2015). Eurobarometer Qualitative study - “Public opinion on future innovations, science and technology” - Aggregate Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/quali/ql_futureofscience_en.pdf (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

European Union. (2018a). Horizon 2020-Work Programme 2018-2020: 16. Science with and for Society. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-swfs_en.pdf (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

European Union. (2018b). Standard Eurobarometer 88: ‘Media Use in the European Union’-Report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/STANDARD/surveyKy/2143 (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Evert, S. (2009). Corpora and Collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: an International Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1212–1248). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Cerca con Google

Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts. Written Communication, 3(3), 275–296. Cerca con Google

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold. Cerca con Google

Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient Discriminant Validity: A Comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. Cerca con Google

Fitzgerald, H. G. (2003). How Different Are We?: Spoken Discourse in Intercultural Communication: The Significance of the Situational Context (Vol. 4). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cerca con Google

Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. Cerca con Google

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Cerca con Google

Fox, N. J. (2011). Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies. Sociology, 45(1), 70–85. Cerca con Google

Friedl, J. E. F. (1997). Mastering Regular Expressions: Powerful Techniques for Perl and Other Tools. Sebastopol: O’Reilly. Cerca con Google

Friginal, E., Pearson, P., Di Ferrante, L., Pickering, L., & Bruce, C. (2013). Linguistic Characteristics of Aac Discourse in the Workplace. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 279–298. Cerca con Google

Fuller, G. (1998). Cultivating Science: Negotiating Discourse in the Popular Texts of Stephen Jay Gould. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Dcience (pp. 35–63). London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Funk, C., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2017). Science News and Information Today. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2017/09/14122431/PJ_2017.09.20_Science-and-News_FINAL.pdf (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. Cerca con Google

Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness Analysis: Nature, Metrics and Techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review: Routledge (pp. 225–258). London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Cerca con Google

Garzone, G. (2006). Perspectives on ESP and Popularization. Milano: CUEM. Cerca con Google

Gea-Valor, M. L., García-Izquierdo, I., & Esteve, M. J. (Eds.). (2010). Linguistic and Translation Studies in Scientific Communication. Bern: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York, London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (2012). Introduction. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–6). Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Cerca con Google

Giardullo, P. (in press). Spreading Mosquitoes: A Media Analysis of Italian National Newspaper Coverage of Mosquito-Borne Diseases and Related Interventions. In C. Claeys (Ed.), Mosquito Management: Environmental Issues and Health Concerns. Bruxelles: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Giardullo, P., & Lorenzet, A. (2016). Techno-scientific Issues in the Public Sphere (TIPS). EASST Review, 35(4), 14–17. Cerca con Google

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage. Cerca con Google

Giordano, C. (2018, August 11). Roundup Maker Defends Weedkiller After Being Told to Pay $289m to Cancer Sufferer. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/roundup-weedkiller-289-million-terminal-cancer-school-groundskeeper-dewayne-johnson-a8487336.html (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Cerca con Google

Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor Analysis. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W.B. Saunders Company. Cerca con Google

Gotti, M. (1996). Il linguaggio della divulgazione: problematiche di traduzione intralinguistica. In G. Cortese (Ed.), Tradurre i linguaggi settoriali (pp. 217–235). Torino: Edizioni Libreria Cortina. Cerca con Google

Gotti, M. (2003). Specialized Discourse: Linguistic Features and Changing Conventions. Bern: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Gotti, M. (2008). Investigating Specialized Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Gotti, M. (2012). La riscrittura del testo da specialistico a divulgativo. Altre Modernità, 11, 145–159. Cerca con Google

Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2011). Corpus Approaches to the Study of Discourse. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 138–154). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Greco, P. (2006). Il modello Venezia: La comunicazione nell’era post-accademica della scienza. In N. Pitrelli & G. Sturloni (Eds.), La comunicazione della scienza. Atti del I e II Convegno Nazionale (pp. 11–35). Roma: Zadigroma. Cerca con Google

Greenfield, P., & Levin, S. (2018, August 11). Monsanto Ordered to Pay $289m as Jury Rules Weedkiller Caused Man’s Cancer. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/10/monsanto-trial-cancer-dewayne-johnson-ruling (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Grego, K. (2013). ‘The Physics you Buy in Supermarkets’, Writing Science for the General Public: the Case of Stephen Hawking. In S. Kermas & T. Christiansen (Eds.), The Popularization of Specialized Discourse and Knowledge across Communities and Cultures (pp. 149–172). Bari: Edipuglia. Cerca con Google

Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and Evaluating Factor Scores. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 430–450. Cerca con Google

Gries, S. T. (2010). Corpus Linguistics and Theoretical Linguistics: A Love–Hate Relationship? Not Necessarily…. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(3), 327–343. Cerca con Google

Gross, A. G. (1994). The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 3(1), 3–24. Cerca con Google

Grundmann, R., & Cavaillé, J.-P. (2000). Simplicity in Science and its Publics. Science as Culture, 9(3), 353–389. Cerca con Google

Grundy, P. (2013). Doing Pragmatics. New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational Techniques Used in Transferring Knowledge Between Medical Experts and Non-Experts. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 235–263. Cerca con Google

Gumperz, J., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1986). Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Speaking. New York: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press. Cerca con Google

Hall, S. (2006). Encoding/Decoding. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks (pp. 163–173). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold. Cerca con Google

Halliday, M. A. K. (1991). Corpus Studies and Probabilistic Grammar. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies on Honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 30–43). New York: Longman. Cerca con Google

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Bristol, London: Falmer Press. Cerca con Google

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold. Cerca con Google

Hardt, H. (1992). Critical Communication Studies: Communication, History and Theory in America. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Harris, R. J. (2013). A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. New York, Hove: Psychology Press. Cerca con Google

Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing. Cerca con Google

Hellsten, I. (2002). Selling the Life Sciences: Promises of a Better Future in Biotechnology Advertisements. Science as Culture, 11(4), 459–479. Cerca con Google

Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. Cerca con Google

Herring, S. C., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 127–151). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Highfield, R. (2000, July 7). Selling Science to the Public. Science (New Series), 289(5476), 59. Cerca con Google

Hilgartner, S. (1990). The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519–539. Cerca con Google

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Holliday, A. (2010). Analysing Qualitative Data. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 98–110). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Hunston, S. (2013). Systemic Functional Linguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and the Ideology of Science. Text & Talk, 33(4–5), 617–640. Cerca con Google

Hyland, K. (2008). As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. Cerca con Google

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116–127. Cerca con Google

Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 34–61). London: Sage. Cerca con Google

Jakobson, R. (1959). On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On Translation (pp. 232–239). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Cerca con Google

Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Petersen, J. C., & Pinch, T. (1995). Communicating Science and Technology. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 317–319). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Johansson, S. (2007). Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: On the use of corpora in contrastive studies. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Cerca con Google

Kabacoff, R. (2011). R in Action: Data Analysis and Graphics with R. Shelter Island: Manning Publications. Cerca con Google

Kennedy, D. (2010). Science and the Media. In D. Kennedy & G. Overholser (Eds.), Science and the Media (pp. 1–9). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Cerca con Google

Kline, P. (1994). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Cerca con Google

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 140–166). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Cerca con Google

Konietschke, F., Placzek, M., Schaarschmidt, F., & Hothorn, L. A. (2015). nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals. Journal of Statistical Software, 64(9), 1–17. Cerca con Google

Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York, London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cerca con Google

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cerca con Google

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Cerca con Google

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, Chichester: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

Law, J. (2008). On Sociology and STS. The Sociological Review, 56(4), 623–649. Cerca con Google

Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2000). Performing Technology’s Stories: On Social Constructivism, Performance, and Performativity. Technology and Culture, 41(4), 765–775. Cerca con Google

Le, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008). FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. Cerca con Google

Lee, D. Y. W. (2000). Modelling Variation in Spoken and Written English: the Multi-Dimensional Approach Revisited. Lancaster University. Cerca con Google

Lee, D. Y. W. (2008). Corpora and Discourse Analysis: New Ways of Doing Old Things. In V. K. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 86–99). New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Leech, G. (1992). Corpora and Theories of Linguistic Performance. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991 (pp. 105–122). Cerca con Google

Leech, G. (2007). New Resources, or Just Better Old Ones? The Holy Grail of Representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and the Web (pp. 133–149). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi. Cerca con Google

Leech, G., Garside, R., & Bryant, M. (1994). CLAWS4: the Tagging of the British National Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1 (pp. 622–628). Association for Computational Linguistics. Cerca con Google

Leitner, G. (1998). The Sociolinguistics of Communication Media. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 187–208). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Cerca con Google

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Levinson, S. C. (2006). Deixis. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Levshina, N. (2015). How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Lewenstein, B. V. (1995). From Fax to Facts: Communication in the Cold Fusion Saga. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 403–436. Cerca con Google

Lewenstein, B. V. (2003). Models of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 16, 1–11. Cerca con Google

Lock, S. J. (2011). Deficits and Dialogues: Science Communication and the Public Understanding of Science in the Uk. In D. J. Bennett, R. C. Jennings, & W. Bodmer (Eds.), Successful Science Communication: Telling It Like It Is (pp. 17–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience. Written Communication, 30(4), 428–457. Cerca con Google

Machin, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Maksymski, K., Gutermuth, S., & Hansen-Schirra, S. (Eds.). (2015). Translation and Comprehensibility. Berlin: Frank & Timme. Cerca con Google

Marcus, M. P., Marcinkiewicz, M. A., & Santorini, B. (1993). Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2), 313–330. Cerca con Google

Martin, James R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Cerca con Google

Martin, James R., & Veel, R. (1998). Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Martin, James R., & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Cerca con Google

Martínez Sierra, J. J. (2010). Science and Technology on the Screen: the Traslation of Documentaries. In M. L. Gea-Valor, I. García-Izquierdo, & M. J. Esteve (Eds.), Linguistic and Translation Studies in Scientific Communication (pp. 277–294). Bern: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Mautner, G. (2016). Checks and Balances: How Corpus Linguistics Can Contribute to Cda. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 154–179). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage. Cerca con Google

McEnery, A. M., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: an Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. Cerca con Google

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Meinhof, U. H. (1994). Double Talk in News Broadcasts: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Pictures and Texts in Television News. In D. Graddol & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.), Media Texts: Authors and Readers (pp. 212–223). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Cerca con Google

Merakchi, K., & Rogers, M. (2013). The Translation of Culturally Bound Metaphors in the Genre of Popular Science Articles: A Corpus-Based Case Study from Scientific American Translated into Arabic. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 341–372. Cerca con Google

Merton, R. K. (1942). Science and Technology in a Democratic Order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1 , 115-126. Reprinted as Merton, R. K. (1973). The Normative Structure of Science. In Merton, R. K., The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (pp. 267-279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cerca con Google

Meyer, M. (2001). Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 14–31). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Mimno, D. (2012). Computational Historiography: Data Mining in a Century of Classics Journals. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 5(1), 3:1-3:19. Cerca con Google

Minelli De Oliveira, J. M., & Pagano, A. S. (2006). The Research Article and the Science Popularization Article: A Probabilistic Functional Grammar Perspective on Direct Discourse Representation. Discourse Studies, 8(5), 627–646. Cerca con Google

Moirand, S. (2003). Communicative and Cognitive Dimensions of Discourse on Science in the French Mass Media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 175–206. Cerca con Google

Montgomery, J. (2018, August 13). How We Talk About AI, and Why It Matters: Emerging Debates at the International Conference for Machine Learning 2018. Retrieved 29 September 2018, from https://blogs.royalsociety.org/in-verba/2018/08/13/how-we-talk-about-ai-and-why-it-matters-emerging-debates-at-the-international-conference-for-machine-learning-2018/ (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Montgomery, M. (2011). Discourse and the News. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 213–227). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi-Reci, I. (2018). Market Research: The Process, Data, and Methods Using Stata. Singapore: Springer. Cerca con Google

Morley, G. D. (2000). Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with Spss. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Musacchio, M. T. (2017). Translating Popular Science. Padova: Cleup. Cerca con Google

Myers, G. (1989). The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. Cerca con Google

Myers, G. (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: The University of Winconsin Press. Cerca con Google

Myers, G. (1994). Narratives of Science and Nature in Popularizing Molecular Genetics. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 179–190). London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Myers, G. (2003). Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265–279. Cerca con Google

Myers, G. (2010). The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Cerca con Google

Neresini, F. (2000). And Man Descended from the Sheep: The Public Debate on Cloning in the Italian Press. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 359–382. Cerca con Google

Neresini, F. (2017). Old Media and New Opportunities for a Computational Social Science on PCST. Journal of Science Communication, 16(2), 13. Cerca con Google

Neresini, F., & Lorenzet, A. (2016). Can Media Monitoring be a Proxy for Public Opinion about Technoscientific Controversies? The Case of the Italian Public Debate on Nuclear Power. Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 171–185. Cerca con Google

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Nini, A. (2014). Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (Version 1.2). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger/versions (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. Cerca con Google

O’Neill, D., & Harcup, T. (2009). News Values and Selectivity. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 161–174). New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2011). Research in English for Specific Purposes. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 106–121). New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Paltridge, B., & Wang, W. (2010). Researching Discourse. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 256–273). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Parkinson, J. (2013). English for Science and Technology. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 156–174). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 . Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. Cerca con Google

Pianta, E., Girardi, C., Zanoli, R., & Kessler, F. B. (2008). The Textpro Tool Suite. In Proceedings of the 6th language resources and evaluation conference (LREC 2008). Cerca con Google

Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s Electric Factor Analysis Machine. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2(1), 13–43. Cerca con Google

Preacher, K. J., Zhang, G., Kim, C., & Mels, G. (2013). Choosing the Optimal Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Model Selection Perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(1), 28–56. Cerca con Google

Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. London: Sage. Cerca con Google

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman. Cerca con Google

R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Rensberger, B. (2000, July 7). The Nature of Evidence. Science (New Series), 289(5476), 61. Cerca con Google

Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research (Version 1.7.8). Evanston, Illinois, USA: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cerca con Google

Rossi, P. (2006). I meccanici, gli ingegneri, l’idea di progresso. In P. Rossi (Ed.), Storia della scienza (Vol. 1, pp. 85–106). Novara: Istituto Geografico De Agostini. Cerca con Google

Russell, C. (2010). Covering Controversial Science: Improving Reporting on Science and Public Policy. In D. Kennedy & G. Overholser (Eds.), Science and the Media. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Cerca con Google

Saferstein, B. (2007). Process Narratives, Grey Boxes, and Discourse Frameworks: Cognition, Interaction, and Constraint in Understanding Genetics and Medicine. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3), 424–447. Cerca con Google

Santorini, B. (1991). Part-of-Speech Tagging Guidelines for the Penn Treebank Project. Technical Reports (CIS). Cerca con Google

Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Communicating science in social settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14040–14047. Cerca con Google

Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). The Public and Nanotechnology: How Citizens Make Sense of Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659–667. Cerca con Google

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (First edition). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Schmid, H. (1995). Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Cerca con Google

Scollon, R. (1997). Attribution and Power in Hong Kong News Discourse. World Englishes, 16(3), 383–393. Cerca con Google

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Discourse and Intercultural Communication. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 538–547). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Scott, M. (1997). Pc Analysis of Key Words—and Key Key Words. System, 25(2), 233–245. Cerca con Google

Scott, M. (2004). Wordsmith Tools (Version 4) [Windows]. Retrieved from http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version4/ (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Scott, M. (2010). Problems in Investigating Keyness, or Clearing the Undergrowth and Marking Out Trails... In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 43–57). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education (Vol. 22). Philadelphia, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Cerca con Google

Seguin, È. (2001). Narration and Legitimation: The Case of in Vitro Fertilization. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 195–215. Cerca con Google

Semino, E. (2002). A Sturdy Baby or a Derailing Train? Metaphorical Representations of the Euro in British and Italian Newspapers. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 22(1), 107–140. Cerca con Google

Sharkas, H. (2009). Translation Quality Assessment of Popular Science Articles. Transkom Zeitschrift Für Translation Und Kommunikation, 2(1), 42–62. Cerca con Google

Shinn, T., & Whitley, R. P. (1985). Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (Vol. 9). Dordrecht: Springer. Cerca con Google

Shuttleworth, M. (2011). Translational Behaviour at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge: A Multilingual Investigation into Popular Science Metaphor in Translation. The Translator, 17(2), 301–323. Cerca con Google

Siegfried, T. (2006). Reporting from Science Journals. In D. Blum, M. Knudson, & R. M. Henig (Eds.), A Field Guide for Science Writers, Second Edition (pp. 11–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

Sinclair, J. (2004a). Developing Linguistic Corpora: a Guide to Good Practice. Retrieved 25 November 2018, from https://ota.ox.ac.uk/documents/creating/dlc/chapter1.htm. Vai! Cerca con Google

Sinclair, J. (2004b). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London, New York: Routledge. Cerca con Google

Sismondo, S. (2010). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Malden, Oxford, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Cerca con Google

Spatz, C. (2011). Basic Statistics: Tales of Distributions. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Cerca con Google

Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., & Kokkinakis, G. (2000). Text Genre Detection Using Common Word Frequencies. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 2 (pp. 808–814). Association for Computational Linguistics. Cerca con Google

Star, S. L. (1988). Introduction: The Sociology of Science and Technology. Social Problems, 35(3), 197–205. Cerca con Google

Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. Cerca con Google

Stubbs, M. (1993). British Traditions in Text Analysis: from Firth to Sinclair. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: in Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 1–33). Philadelphia, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Blackwell Oxford. Cerca con Google

Stubbs, M. (2010). Three Concepts of Keywords. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 21–42). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Cerca con Google

Stubbs, M. (2017). Language and the Mediation of Experience: Linguistic Representation and Cognitive Orientation. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 246–256). Blackwell Reference Online. Cerca con Google

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

Szymanski, E. A. (2016). Constructing Relationships Between Science and Practice in the Written Science Communication of the Washington State Wine Industry. Written Communication, 33(2), 184–215. Cerca con Google

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Cerca con Google

Talmy, S. (2010). Critical Research in Applied Linguistics. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 127–142). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Tambini, D., & Labo, S. (2016). Digital Intermediaries in the Uk: Implications for News Plurality. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 18(4), 33–58. Cerca con Google

Tardy, C. M. (2011). Genre Analysis. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 54–68). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The New Era of Mixed Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. Cerca con Google

Taylor, A., Marcus, M., & Santorini, B. (2003). The Penn Treebank: an Overview. In A. Abeillé (Ed.), Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora (pp. 5–22). New York: Springer. Cerca con Google

Taylor, C. (2010). Science in the News: A Diachronic Perspective. Corpora, 5(2), 221–250. Cerca con Google

Taylor, C. (2014). Investigating the Representation of Migrants in the UK and Italian Press. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(3), 368–400. Cerca con Google

Telegraph Reporters. (2018, August 11). Monsanto Ordered to Pay $289m to Terminally Ill Groundsman Who Used Roundup Weedkiller. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2018/08/11/monsanto-ordered-pay-289-million-cancer-patient/ (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Ten Have, P. (2004). Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage. Cerca con Google

Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage. Cerca con Google

Teubert, W. (2005). My Version of Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(1), 1–13. Cerca con Google

Thompson, K. (1968). Programming Techniques: Regular Expression Search Algorithm. Communications of the ACM, 11(6), 419–422. Cerca con Google

Tian, Y., & Lo, D. (2015). A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Part-of-Speech Tagging Techniques on Bug Reports. In Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference (pp. 570–574). IEEE. Cerca con Google

TIPS - Technoscientific Issues in the Public Sphere. (n.d.). Retrieved 29 September 2018, from http://www.tipsproject.eu/tips/#/public/home (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Trappes-Lomax, H. (2004). Discourse Analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 133–164). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

UNESCO. (2005). UNESCO World Report: Towards Knowledge Societies. Paris. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf (Last accessed in August 2018). Vai! Cerca con Google

Väliverronen, E., & Hellsten, I. (2002). From “Burning Library” to “Green Medicine” the Role of Metaphors in Communicating Biodiversity. Science Communication, 24(2), 229–245. Cerca con Google

van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum associates. Cerca con Google

van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466–485). Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

Varttala, T. (2001). Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse. Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience. Tampere: Tampere University Press. Cerca con Google

Whitley, R. (1985). Knowledge Producers and Knowledge Acquirers: Popularisation as a Relation Between Scientific Fields and Their Publics. In R. Whitley & T. Shinn (Eds.), Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Cerca con Google

Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis. In B. Paltridge & K. Hyland (Eds.) (pp. 38–53). London, New York: Continuum. Cerca con Google

Wright, S. (2016). Language Policy and Language Planning: From Nationalism to Globalisation. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Cerca con Google

Wynne, M. (2008). Searching and Concordancing. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: an International Handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 706–737). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Cerca con Google

Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450. Cerca con Google

Xiao, Z., & McEnery, A. (2005). Two Approaches to Genre Analysis: Three Genres in Modern American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 62–82. Cerca con Google

Zambrana, M. R. B. (2010). Ontologies for Scientific-Technical Translation. In M. L. Gea-Valor, I. García-Izquierdo, & M. J. Esteve (Eds.), Linguistic and Translation Studies in Scientific Communication (pp. 295–312). Bern: Peter Lang. Cerca con Google

Zethsen, K. (2009). Intralingual Translation: An Attempt at Description. Meta: Translators’ Journal, 54(4), 795–812. Cerca con Google

Ziman, J. (1996). ‘Postacademic Science’: Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms. Science Studies, 9(1), 67–80. Cerca con Google

Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least-Effort. Cambridge Ma Edn. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley. Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record