Go to the content. | Move to the navigation | Go to the site search | Go to the menu | Contacts | Accessibility

| Create Account

Poltronieri, Sara (2008) Determination of the orbit of Titan from Cassini. Altimeter data. [Ph.D. thesis]

Full text disponibile come:

Documento PDF

Abstract (english)

The research presented in this thesis concerns the improvement of Titan’s orbit determination by the
means of the altimetric data captured by the Cassini’s RADAR instrument. The work carries out the
development and implementation in the SOSYA (SOlar SYstem Astrometry) software tool, of a module,
called SOSYA?ART (SOlar SYstem Astrometry?Altimetric Run Tool), that computes bodies’Orbit Determination
by an altimetric type process. Moreover, the Measurements Simulation part of SOSYA has
been enriched the introduction of the module that creates synthetic altimetric measurements at given
observation times set. This research can be divided in four parts.
The first part gives a brief introduction of the Cassini mission and a detailed description of the
RADAR instrument on board the satellite with its features and scientific purposes. RADAR is a multimode
instrument that uses the five beam antenna feed assembly associated with the spacecraft high
gain antenna to transmit and receive electromagnetic radiation according to different operative modes:
imaging mode, altimeter mode, radiometer and scatterometer mode. A precise observation sequence of
observations is performed during each Titan’s encounter: within 25,000 km range active scatterometer
measurements start, then the low resolution altimeter mode is planned between 9000 and 22.500 while the
high resolution altimeter mode is performed between 4000 and 9000 km. The imaging mode is selected
while the spacecraft altitude passes from 4000 km to its minimum value, then outbound observations are
repeated in reverse order.
Basic concepts of the radar theory and signal modulation are presented. Radar data acquisition is a
type of remote sensing technique. These techniques acquire information detecting and measuring changes
that the object causes on the surrounding field (potential, electromagnetic or acoustic field). In fact, radar
altimetry involves bouncing microwave pulses off the surface of the target body and measuring the time
it takes the echo to return to the spacecraft.
The second part is concerned with the fundamentals of orbit determination. Statistical orbit determination
is the set of techniques that allows the estimation of the orbital parameters of a spacecraft
or a celestial body during its motion in the Solar System. It is the problem of determining the best
estimate of the orbital parameters of a spacecraft or a celestial body, whose initial state is unknown,
from observations influenced by random and systematic errors, using a mathematical model that is not
exact. Then we give the detailed development of the geometrical observation model used to determine
the altimetric measurement for the residuals computation at each observation time.
The problem of orbit determination is solved by SOSYA?ART for Titan’s state at epoch, t0, keeping
fixed the trajectory of Cassini spacecraft. Titan’s surface is considered as a sphere of 2575 km radius and
the problem is solved in the reference frame centered on the barycenter of the Saturnian system. At each
observation time, Cassini’s ephemeris and attitude values are read from SPICE’s SPK and CK kernels
files and corrected for light time, while Titan’s states are integrated and interpolated by the means of
SOSYA’s Orbit Simulation capability [2]. Then, as the field of view direction of RADAR beam is strictly
connected to the spacecraft’s attitude, the intersection point with the surface is computed and residual
value is found. The weighted least squares method is applied to fit to the observational data and the set
of adjustable parameters are Titan’s position and velocity.

The third part is dedicated to the altimetric data used and to the flybys during which they were
collected by the Cassini RADAR. The altimetric observation processed in the software tool is the distance,
or rather the range-to-target (RTT), measured from the antenna’s center of phase to the surface of the
target body. The altimetric data have been received from CO.RI.S.T.A. (Consortium for Research on
Advanced Remote Sensing Systems) and they have been collected in 12 of 44 Titan’s flybys, beginning
from the flyby completed on 26th October 2004 (Ta) and up to the one completed on 20th December
2007 (T39). The total number of altimetric measurements processed is 13080 and they are not uniformly
distributed in the 14 flybys: T13 and T25 have the lowest numbers of observations so they are precessed
but not included in results discussion. For each of these encounters we searched for the SPK kernels,
containing Cassini’s ephemerides, and the relative CK kernels, containing the spacecraft attitude matrices.
In order to give a description of the flybys used in the Orbit Determination process, we implemented
a simple SPICE-based routine that reads the ephemeris files and gives three output files containing
respectively: 1) Cassini barycentric states, 2) Titan barycentric states and 3) Cassini states in Titancentered
reference frame. Then by the use of Matlab, the states have been plotted in order to visualize
the entire encounters in two different ways: the first one is the Titan-centric representation of the flyby
while the second one is the orthogonal projection on the xy plane of the Saturn-barycentric passage. For
each available flyby, we give its general description, as duration and the closest approach distance and
time. Moreover we give tables that summarize the distribution over time of the altimetric observation
The last part of the work is entirely dedicated to the Orbit Determination process and to the discussion
about the solutions obtained for Titan’s states computed at the batch epochs by SOSYA?ART. Since
the altimetric observation errors were not available, we have used a constant value for the weight of 80
m for all the observations corresponding to the maximum resolution value that the instrument achieves
approximatively. Titan’s flybys T13 and T25 are have been processed but they are not discussed with the
others results obtained because they have very few observations. The mean of all the rms values at first
iteration is 4.703 km and it decreases to the value of 81.67 m at last iteration underlining the goodness
of the solutions for Titan’s states obtained with respect the initial ones. The global mean of residuals
at the first iteration is -340 m and it decreases to the global mean at the last iteration of ?4.296 · 10?4
km, giving the possibility of neglecting the bias estimation. The minimum value of standard deviation
of the estimated position is 294 m, while the maximum value is 5.233 km. The standard deviation of
the velocity ranges from a minimum of 6.322 · 10?2 m/s to a maximum value of 7.2 m/s. Although our
estimation has been made only for Titan and yields particular and local solutions, the results are fully
satisfying. Jacobson [8] obtained 1- uncertainties for Titan of 40 km along R, 150 km along T and 50
km along N. These results come from astrometry, radiometric tracking and spacecraft imaging data and
estimating all the major Saturnian satellites. The accuracy of our solution is limited by the altimetric
measurement errors and by the a priori covariance matrix values applied to the initial conditions of the
natural bodies integrated. In fact we proved that the standard deviation errors effectively decrease by
the use of different a priori variance matrices. In addition, the resulting accuracy of the estimation is due
to the short orbital arcs considered in the orbit determination process over which the measurements are
Our research can be further extended to other mission scenarios in order to reach a better accuracy in
the orbit determination of natural satellites by the means of altimetric data collected on board spacecrafts
by radar or laser instruments.
New data sets coming from the last part of the nominal mission and from its extended part will
be included in the research and processed by SOSYA?ART. In this way we have a sufficient numbers
of points at which Titan’s state has been computed and this becomes the basis on which starting the
reconstruction of the improved moon’s orbit together with the other types of observation. In order to
compute a global solution all over the entire tour with more accurate estimation of Titan’state, a multi-arc approach would be probably indicated.
SOSYA?ART will be enriched by the consider covariance analysis module testing the impact of the
introduction of the altimetric observations on the state estimation process without having the real data.
The altimetric measurements simulation module will be improved by the introduction of the possibility
of adding noise to the signal.

Statistiche Download - Aggiungi a RefWorks
EPrint type:Ph.D. thesis
Tutor:Casotto, Stefano
Data di deposito della tesi:16 December 2008
Anno di Pubblicazione:2008
Key Words:Titan Orbit determination altimetry altimeter altitude Cassini RADAR radar satellite altimetry
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 02 - Scienze fisiche > FIS/05 Astronomia e astrofisica
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > pre 2012 - Dipartimento di Astronomia
Codice ID:1300
Depositato il:16 Dec 2008
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format


I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

[1] Akin, E., Object Oriented Programming via Fortran 90/95, Cambridge University Press, New York, Cerca con Google

2003. Cerca con Google

[2] Bardella M., Determination of the orbits of the natural satellites of Saturn from optical observations, Cerca con Google

PhD Thesis, School of PhD of Research in Sciences Technologies and Measurements for Space Cerca con Google

(Astronautic and Satellite Science). Cerca con Google

[3] CO.RI.S.T.A., Cassini Radar Altimeter - ASCII File Description (Version 2 Data), 2007/10/25. Cerca con Google

[4] Eddy, W.F., McCarthy, J.J., Pavlis, D.E., Marshall, J.A., Luthcke, S.B., Tsaoussi, L.S., Leung, G., Cerca con Google

Williams, D.A., “GEODYN II - Vol. 1, Systems Description”, STX System Corporation, Philadelphia, Cerca con Google

1990. Cerca con Google

[5] Elachi C., Introduction to the Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing, Wiley series in remote Cerca con Google

sensing, Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1987. Cerca con Google

[6] Elachi C., RADAR Engineering Technical Write-up Cerca con Google

[7] Franceschetti G. and Lanari R., Synthetic Aperture RADAR PROCESSING, Electronic engineering Cerca con Google

system series, 1999. Cerca con Google

[8] Jacobson, R.A., “The Orbits of the Major Saturnian Satellites and the Gravity Field of Saturn from Cerca con Google

Spacecraft and Earth-Based Observations”, The Astronomical Journal, 128, 492, 2004. Cerca con Google

[9] JPL, Navigation Software Group, “DPTRAJ-ODP User’s Reference Manual”, Volume 1, Volume 2, Cerca con Google

Volume 3, Volume 4, 1996. Cerca con Google

[10] JPL, Variable Order Adams Method for Ordinary Differential Equations, California Institute Of Cerca con Google

Technology, Math `a la Carte, 2006. Cerca con Google

[11] JPL, NAIF (The Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility at JPL), “Most Useful SPICELIB Cerca con Google

subroutines”, NAIF, 2001. Cerca con Google

[12] Lorenz R.D. et al, Cassini RADAR: prospects for Titan surface investigations using the microwave Cerca con Google

radiometer, Planetary and Space Science 51 (2003) 353-364 Cerca con Google

[13] Melacci P.T., Orosei R., Picardi G. and Seu R., Cassini radar: system concept and simulation results, Cerca con Google

Planetary Space Science, Vol 46, No 9/10, pp 1363-1374, 1998. Cerca con Google

[14] NASA, JPL, Cassini-Huygens, Mission To Saturn and Titan, online documentation. Cerca con Google

[15] Nerem R.S., Determination of the general ocean circulation using satellite altimetry froma simultaneous Cerca con Google

solution for the Earth’s gravitational field, Center for Space Research, The University of Texas Cerca con Google

at Austin, CSR-89-2. Cerca con Google

98 BIBLIOGRAPHY Cerca con Google

[16] Pelletier F., Altimeter Range Crossover Analysis for the Near Asteroid Rendezvous Mission, University Cerca con Google

of Texas at Austin, December 2000. Cerca con Google

[17] Peters, C.F., “Numerical Integration of the Satellites of the Outer Planets”, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Cerca con Google

104, 37-41, 1981. Cerca con Google

[18] Picardi G., Elaborazione del segnale radar Metodologie ed applicazioni, Collana Scientifica 1340.51, Cerca con Google

Franco Angeli Editore Cerca con Google

[19] Stiles B., Cassini Radar Burst Ordered Data Product SIS, Version 1.5, Cassini Radar Instrument Cerca con Google

Team, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Californian Institute of Technology, NASA, D-27891, September Cerca con Google

27, 2005. Cerca con Google

[20] Stofan E., Lunine J. et al., Mapping of Titan: Results from the first Titan radar passes, Icarus 185, Cerca con Google

443-456, 2006. Cerca con Google

[21] Tapley, B., Schutz, B., Born, G.H., Statistical Orbit Determination, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004. Cerca con Google

[22] Zebker, H. A., Stiles, B., Hensley, S., Callahan, P., Gim, Y., Lorenz, R. D., Kirk, R. L.,Titan’s Shape Cerca con Google

from Cassini Radar Altimeter and SAR Monopulse Observations, American Geophysical Union, Fall Cerca con Google

Meeting 2008, abstract P11D-02. Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record