Go to the content. | Move to the navigation | Go to the site search | Go to the menu | Contacts | Accessibility

| Create Account

Nardello, Chiara (2008) Il commento di Francesco da Buti all'Ars poetica di Orazio. [Ph.D. thesis]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
18Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
28Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
15Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
98Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
165Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
96Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
150Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
20Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
696Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
33Kb
[img]
Preview
Documento PDF
78Kb

Abstract (english)

The thesis prepared introduces the edition and analysis of the unpublished comment of Francesco da Buti on Horace's Ars poetica. The comment written at the end of XIV century and probably meant for scholarly aims, is to be considered a small, but precious example of the success of the Classics in medieval times and,in particular, of the great esteem granted to Horace's Ars poetica, which was used both by men of letters and by teachers at school education., owing to its contents of regulations.
The thesis first focuses on the figure of Francesco da Buti, an experienced grammarian, a good connoisseur of the Classics (Horace, Persio, Terenzio) and of medieval texts (the Commedia and the Dottrinale). Francesco da Buti's exegetical work can be inserted in the context of the medieval interpretation of the Classics and, in particular, of Horace's work.
This frame of reference is further analysed through a proper confrontation of a number of comments on Ars poetica written before (and limited to those published for practical reasons). Accordingly, particular attention has been given to the first work (Porfirione's and pseudo-Acrone's), to the comment handed down by codes Par.Lat. 7971,7972,7974, probably written in the late Carolingian Age, to Scholia, handed down by Par.Lat. 17897 dating back to the XI century as well as to other following expositions. The Scholia are the first, known example of the renewed interest in Horace's poetry following the rules of the Auctores, that is, the Scholia Vindobonensia (IX century), the Anonymus Turicensis (XII century) and the Materia (XII, area id Chartres).
The main part of the thesis work is devoted to the edition and analysis of the Butian comment. The text is written on the basis of Ambr. E 3 Sup. manuscript, as the other evidence, ms 30 of the Biblioteca Comunale of San Gimignano, is here described.
The ample number of notes included, apart from quoting the sources accurately and examining the grammar observations in the comment exhaustively , also appears to clarify the letter of the text, not always clear, and to suggest a possible interpretation of ambiguous settings. In addition, the thesis work carried out an accurate and meaningful comparison with previous comments and as far as possible, with the other exegetical works of Francesco da Buti, so that as to characterize the comment with rapport to the different kinds of medieval comments and to propose its proven position being used in traditional writing genres, mainly those connected with the university milieu and thus aimed at teaching.


Statistiche Download - Aggiungi a RefWorks
EPrint type:Ph.D. thesis
Tutor:Rigo, Paola
Ph.D. course:Ciclo 20 > Scuole per il 20simo ciclo > SCIENZE LINGUISTICHE, FILOLOGICHE E LETTERARIE > ITALIANISTICA
Data di deposito della tesi:31 January 2008
Anno di Pubblicazione:31 January 2008
Key Words:esegesi medioevale, Ars poetica, Francesco da Buti, fortuna di Orazio
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 10 - Scienze dell'antichità, filologico-letterarie e storico-artistiche > L-FIL-LET/08 Letteratura latina medievale e umanistica
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > pre 2012 - Dipartimento di Italianistica
Codice ID:343
Depositato il:13 Nov 2008
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record