Vai ai contenuti. | Spostati sulla navigazione | Spostati sulla ricerca | Vai al menu | Contatti | Accessibilità

| Crea un account

Leoncini, Debora (2008) I meccanismi di accesso lessicale e il paradigma di interferenza figura-figura. [Tesi di dottorato]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Anteprima
Documento PDF
1134Kb

Abstract (inglese)

With the picture-word interference paradigm, four different effects have been observed in bare noun production. Beside the well-known semantic categorical interference and phonological facilitation effect, recently also the frequency of the distracter word (Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003) and the congruity of grammatical gender (Cubelli et al., 2005) have been reported to affect naming times. The aim of this study is to verify whether this effects occur also with the picture-picture paradigm. In three experiments semantic relatedness, gender congruency, phonological similarity, and distracter frequency were manipulated. Participants were asked to name the picture cued by an arrow (appearing on the screen 40 ms. before the picture pairs). In contrast with studies using the picture-word paradigm, results showed only a significant phonological facilitation. This effect suggests that, although irrelevant to accomplish the task, the phonological form of the distracter's name is activated, thus supporting the cascade model of lexical access (Morsella & Miozzo, 2002; Navarrete & Costa, 2005). In contrast, the lack of semantic, grammatical and frequency effects suggests that these effects depend on the format of the distracter and that when the distracter stimulus is a picture no competition occurs at the lexical level. At variance with the picture-word task, where the distracter is processed faster than the target picture, thus leading the corresponding lemma to reach a higher level of activation and to compete for selection, in the picture-picture task the processing of the distracter stimulus is not advantaged and does not interfere with the naming process.


Statistiche Download - Aggiungi a RefWorks
Tipo di EPrint:Tesi di dottorato
Relatore:Peressotti, Francesca
Dottorato (corsi e scuole):Ciclo 20 > Scuole per il 20simo ciclo > SCIENZE PSICOLOGICHE > SCIENZE COGNITIVE
Data di deposito della tesi:2008
Anno di Pubblicazione:2008
Parole chiave (italiano / inglese):Paradigma di interferenza figura-figura, accesso lessicale, genere grammaticale, intereferenza semantica, facilitazione fonologica, word-frequency.
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 11 - Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche > M-PSI/01 Psicologia generale
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione
Codice ID:416
Depositato il:14 Ott 2008
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

1. Alario, F. X., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179-223. Cerca con Google

2. Alario, F.-X., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741-764. Cerca con Google

3. Altmann, E. M. & Davidson, D. J. (August, 2001). An integrative approach to Stroop: Combining a language model and a unified cognitive theory. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 21-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cerca con Google

4. Arnaud, P. J. L. (1999). Target-error resemblance in French word sostitution speech errors and the mental lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 269-287. Cerca con Google

5. Avila, C., Ralph, M. A. L., Parcet, M. A., Geffner, D., & Gonzalez-Darder, J. M. (2001). Implicit word cues facilitate impaired naming performance: Evidence from a case of anomia. Brain and Language, 79, 185-200. Cerca con Google

6. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57, 193-216. Cerca con Google

7. Berg, T. (1992). Productive and perceptual constraints on speech-error correction. Psychological Research, 54, 114-126. Cerca con Google

8. Bertinetto, P.M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, C., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A.M. (2005). CoLFIS (Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto) [Corpus and Frequency Lexicon of Written Italian] http://www.istc.cnr.it/material/database Vai! Cerca con Google

9. Bi,Y., Xu, Y., & Caramazza, A. (submitted). Orthographic and Phonological Effects in the Picture Word Interference Paradigm: Evidence from a Logographic Language. Cerca con Google

10. Bloem, I., & La Heji, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488. Cerca con Google

11. Bloem, I., van der Boogaard, S., & La Heji, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323. Cerca con Google

12. Briggs, P., Underwood, G. (1982) Phonological coding in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 93-112 Cerca con Google

13. Burt, J. S. (2002). Why do non color words interfere with color naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1019-1038. Cerca con Google

14. Butterworth, B., (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen- Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cerca con Google

15. Butterworth B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261- 286. Cerca con Google

16. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. Cerca con Google

17. Caramazza, A., & Costa, A. (2000). The semantic interference effect in the pictureword interference paradigm: Does the response set matter? Cognition, 75, B51-B64. Cerca con Google

18. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: implication for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430-1450. Cerca con Google

19. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the ‘tip-of-the-tongue’ phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309–343. Cerca con Google

20. Caramazza, A., Miozzo, M., Costa, A., Schiller, N., & Alario, F. X. (2001). A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honour of Jacques Mehler. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cerca con Google

21. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65. Cerca con Google

22. Cholin, j., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 47-61. Cerca con Google

23. Collins, A. F., & Ellis, A. W. (1992). Phonological priming of lexical retrieval in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 375-388. Cerca con Google

24. Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Cerca con Google

25. Costa,A., Alario, F-X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bullettin and Review, 12, 125-131. Cerca con Google

26. Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: implications for the models of lexical access, Journal of Experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283-1296. Cerca con Google

27. Costa, A., Mahon, B., Savova, V., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Level of categorization effect: A novel effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Language and cognitive processes, 18, 205-233. Cerca con Google

28. Costa, A., & Sebastian-Galles, (1998). Abstract phonological structure in language production: Evidence from Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 886-903. Cerca con Google

29. Cubelli, R., Lotto, L., Paolieri, D., Girelli, M., & Job, R. (2005) Grammatical gender is selected in bare noun production: Evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 53 (1), 42-59. Cerca con Google

30. Cutting, J. C., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 318-344. Cerca con Google

31. Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Locus of semantic interference in picture– word interference tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 111–117. Cerca con Google

32. Damian, M., F. , and Martin, R.C., (1999) Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25: 345-361. Cerca con Google

33. De Martino, M., Laudanna A., & Shimron J. (2004). La lettura ad alta voce di nomi italiani con desinenza canonica e non canonica. Presentato al Congresso Nazionale della Sezione di Psicologia Sperimentale dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia. Sciacca (Agrigento), 18-20 Settembre. Cerca con Google

34. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. Cerca con Google

35. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effect of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349. Cerca con Google

36. Dell, G. S., & O’Sheaghda, P.G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: a comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psycological Review, 98, 604- 614. Cerca con Google

37. Dell, G. S., & O’Sheaghda, P.G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287-314. Cerca con Google

38. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentences production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20, 611-629. Cerca con Google

39. Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don’t: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Stroop-like task. Cortex, 42, 790-796. Cerca con Google

40. Garrett M.F. (1975) The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

41. Garrett M.F. (1976). Syntactic processes in sentence production. In: R. J. Wales, & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North Holland. Cerca con Google

42. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177-220). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

43. Garrett M. F. (1992). Disorder of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143-180. Cerca con Google

44. Glaser, W.R., & Düngelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654. Cerca con Google

45. Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42. Cerca con Google

46. Hantsch, A., Jescheniak, J.D., & Schriefers, H. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory and Cognition, 33 (6), 984-1000. Cerca con Google

47. Henaff-Gonon, M. A., Bruckert, R., & Michel, F.(1989). Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia, 27, 391-407. Cerca con Google

48. Humphreys, G. W., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Fias, W. (1995). Semantic interference effects on naming using a postcue procedure: Tapping the links between semantics and phonology with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 961–980. Cerca con Google

49. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103. Cerca con Google

50. Jescheniak, J.D., Schriefers, H. (1997) Lexical access in speech production: serial or cascade processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5/6), 847-852 Cerca con Google

51. Jescheniak, J.D., & Schriefers (1998). Serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in language production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274. Cerca con Google

52. Janssen, N., Schirm, W. Mahon, B.Z., and Caramazza, A. (in press). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: Evidence for the response selection hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Cerca con Google

53. Klein, G.S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588. Cerca con Google

54. Kulke, F., & Blanken G. (2001). Phonological and syntactic influences on semantic misnamings in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 3-15. Cerca con Google

55. La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory and Cognition, 16, 400-410. Cerca con Google

56. La Heji, W., Heikoop, K. W., Akerboom, S., & Bloem, I. (2003). Picture naming in picture context: Semantic interference or semantic facilitation? Psychology Science, 45(1), 49-62. Cerca con Google

57. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboorsde, E. (1998). The gendercongruency effect in picture word task. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219. Cerca con Google

58. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Cerca con Google

59. Levelt, W.J.M. (1992) Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22 Cerca con Google

60. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Worberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142. Cerca con Google

61. Levelt, W. J. M., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. (1998). A MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 553-567. Cerca con Google

62. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. Cerca con Google

63. Levelt, W. J. M., & Schriefers, H. (1987). Stages of lexical access. In G. Kempen (Ed.), Natural language generation. New results in artificial intelligence, psychology and linguistics. Dordrecht: Martinus NijhoV. Cerca con Google

64. Lotto, L., Dell’Acqua, R., & Job, R. (2001). Le figure PD/DPSS. Misure di accordo sul nome, tipicità, familiarità, età di acquisizione e tempi di denominazione per 266 figure. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 28, 231–245. Cerca con Google

65. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the pictureword interference Cerca con Google

66. task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495. Cerca con Google

67. Lupker, S. J. (1982) The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in pictureword interference. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 349-367. Cerca con Google

68. Lupker, S. J., & Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision and response factors in pictureword interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Leraning and Memory, 7, 269-282. Cerca con Google

69. Mackay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action. A theory of language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer. Cerca con Google

70. Mahon, B. Z., Costa, A., Peterson, R., Vargas, K. A., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 503-535. Cerca con Google

71. Mahon, B., Costa, A., Shapiro, K., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Grammatical class constraints on lexical selection in speech production: Functional and neuroanatomical considerations. Presentato alla conferenza Euresco; “The Science of Aphasia: Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Language and its Impairment.” Maratea (Italia). Cerca con Google

72. Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M., & Schwarz, M. F. (1994). Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing of consequences of decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language, 47, 609- 660. Cerca con Google

73. Marx, E. (1999). Gender processing in speech production: Evidence from German Speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 601-621. Cerca con Google

74. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. Cerca con Google

75. Melinger, A., & Abdel Rahman, R. (2004). Investigating the interplay between semantic and phonological distractor effets in picture naming. Brain and language, 90, 213-220. Cerca con Google

76. Meyer, A. S. (1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524-545. Cerca con Google

77. Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69-89. Cerca con Google

78. Meyer, A.S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496. Cerca con Google

79. Meyer, A. S., & Belke, E. (in press). Word form retrieval in language production. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

80. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M.F. (2007). Activation of distractor name in the picture picture interference paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 35, 494-503. Cerca con Google

81. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture–word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146- 1160. Cerca con Google

82. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 907–922. Cerca con Google

83. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 228-252. Cerca con Google

84. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (2005). The representation of homophones: Evidence from the distractor frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,31, 1360-1371. Cerca con Google

85. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555–563. Cerca con Google

86. Navarrete, E., Basagni, B., Alario, F-X, & Costa, A. (2006). Does frequency affect lexical selection in speech production? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (10), 1681-1690. Cerca con Google

87. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of memory and language, 53(3), 359-377. Cerca con Google

88. Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., Leoncini, D., Cubelli, R., & Job, R. (submitted). Differential effect of grammatical gender and gender inflection in the picture-word interference paradigm. Cerca con Google

89. Peterson, R. R. & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557. Cerca con Google

90. Posnasky, C. J., & Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 440-460. Cerca con Google

91. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological review, 107, 460-499. Cerca con Google

92. Rayner, K., & Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic similarity effect in the picture-word interference task. British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 207- 222. Cerca con Google

93. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142. Cerca con Google

94. Roelofs, A. (1993). Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs. Cognition, 47, 59-87. Cerca con Google

95. Roelofs, A. (2002). Spoken language planning and initiation of articulation. Quarterly journal of Experimental psychology – Section A, 55, 465-483. Cerca con Google

96. Roelofs, A. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory and Cognition, 32, 212-222. Cerca con Google

97. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantics and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heji (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246-251. Cerca con Google

98. Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). A case for the lemma/lexeme distinction in models of speaking: Comment on Caramazza and Miozzo (1997). Cognition, 69, 219–230. Cerca con Google

99. Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture–word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643–647. Cerca con Google

100. Rosinski, R. R., Golinkoff, R. M., & Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247-253. Cerca con Google

101. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The selection of grammatical features in word production: The case of plural nouns in German. Brain and Language, 81, 342–357. Cerca con Google

102. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of memory and language, 48, 169-194. Cerca con Google

103. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841–850. Cerca con Google

104. Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2002). Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 941-950. Cerca con Google

105. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time-course of lexical access in language production: picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102. Cerca con Google

106. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368–1377. Cerca con Google

107. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools. Cerca con Google

108. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127. Cerca con Google

109. Snodgrass, J. G., Vandervart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. Cerca con Google

110. Starreveld, P. A., (2000). On the interpretation of context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497-525. Cerca con Google

111. Starreveld, P. A, & La Heji, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation and their interaction in naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686-698. Cerca con Google

112. Starreveld, P. A, & La Heji, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896-918. Cerca con Google

113. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heji, W. (1999). What about phonological facilitation, response-set membership, and phonological co-activation? Behavioral and Brain science, 22, 56-58. Cerca con Google

114. Starreveld, P. A., & La Heji, W. (2004). Phonological facilitation of grammatical gender retrieval. Language and cognitive processes, 19, 677-711. Cerca con Google

115. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 1, pp. 143-186). London: Erlbaum. Cerca con Google

116. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. Cerca con Google

117. Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8, 314-317. Cerca con Google

118. Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1999). The effects of distractor words on naming pictures at the subordinate level. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A, 905-926. Cerca con Google

119. Wilshire, C. E., & Saffran, E. M. (2005). Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production. Cognition, 95, 31-71. Cerca con Google

120. Wingfield A. (1968). Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 226-234. Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record