Vai ai contenuti. | Spostati sulla navigazione | Spostati sulla ricerca | Vai al menu | Contatti | Accessibilità

| Crea un account

Agrillo, Christian (2008) La cognizione numerica degli animali: il Teleosteo Gambusia Holbrooki come modello sperimentale. [Tesi di dottorato]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Anteprima
Documento PDF
2395Kb

Abstract (inglese)

It has long been recognized that the ability to make numerical judgments predates the evolution of human language. In the last few decades, a large body of evidence has accumulated on numerical competence in mammal and birds, but little is known about the numerical abilities in lower vertebrates.
The present research investigated numerical competence in fish, using both spontaneous choice test and training procedure. Results of free-choice test show that female mosquitofish seem to use two distinct systems for quantity discrimination; at the same time this study provides persuasive evidence that, when choosing between two shoals differing in numerosity, fish do not use numerical representation but rather base their choice on non-numerical variables that are correlated with group size.
Training procedure demostrated, however, that fish can learn how to distinguish among 2 e 3 elements without attending the visual cues spontaneously considered in free-choice tests.
To date, this research represents the first evidence in literature of numerical competence in fish.


Statistiche Download - Aggiungi a RefWorks
Tipo di EPrint:Tesi di dottorato
Relatore:Bisazza, Angelo
Dottorato (corsi e scuole):Ciclo 20 > Scuole per il 20simo ciclo > SCIENZE PSICOLOGICHE > PSICOBIOLOGIA
Data di deposito della tesi:2008
Anno di Pubblicazione:2008
Parole chiave (italiano / inglese):Cognizione numerica, Pesci, Abilità matematiche, Psicologia animale
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 11 - Scienze storiche, filosofiche, pedagogiche e psicologiche > M-PSI/02 Psicobiologia e psicologia fisiologica
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale
Codice ID:456
Depositato il:13 Ott 2008
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

1. Abrahams, M.V., & Colgan, P.W. (1985). Risk of predation, hydrodynamic efficiency and their influence on school structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 13, 195202. Cerca con Google

2. Agrillo, C., & Dadda, M. (2007). Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 19(2), 145157. Cerca con Google

3. Agrillo, C., Dadda, M., & Bisazza, A. (2006). Sexual harassment influences group choice in female mosquitofish. Ethology, 112, 592598. Cerca con Google

4. Alcock, J. (2001). Etologia: un approccio evolutivo. Zanichelli editore, Bologna. Cerca con Google

5. AlDaham, N.K., Huq, M.F., & Sharma, K.P. (1977). Notes on the ecology of fishes of the genus Aphanius and Gambusia affinis in southern Iraq. Freshwater Biology, 7, 245251. Cerca con Google

6. Alexander, R.D. (1974). The evolution of social behaviour. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325383. Cerca con Google

7. Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86, 201221. Cerca con Google

8. Beran, M.J. (2007). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta ) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 4254. Cerca con Google

9. Beran, M.J., & Beran, M.M. (2004). Chimpanzees remember the results of onebyone addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychological Science, 15, 9499. Cerca con Google

10. Bertram, J.C. (1980). Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Animal Behaviour , 28, 278286. Cerca con Google

11. Bertram, J.C. (1978). Living in groups: predators and prey. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Krebs, J. & Davies, N. (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

12. Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001). Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193199. Cerca con Google

13. Bisazza, A., Vaccari, G., & Pilastro, A. (2001). Female mate choice in a mating system dominated by male sexual coercion. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 5964. Cerca con Google

14. Bisazza, A., & Marin, G. (1995). Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 7, 169183. Cerca con Google

15. Bisazza, A. (1993). Male competition, female mate choice and sexual size dimorphism in poeciliid fishes. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 23, 257286. Cerca con Google

16. Bisazza, A., Marconato, A., & Marin, G. (1989). Male mate preferences in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Ethology, 83, 335343. Cerca con Google

17. Brannon, E.M., Lutz, D., & Cordes, S. (2006). The development of area discrimination and its implications for numerical abilities in infancy. Developmental Science, 9, F59F64. Cerca con Google

18. Brannon, E.M., & Terrace, H.S. (1998). Ordering of the Numerosities 1 to 9 by Monkeys. Science, 282, 746749. Cerca con Google

19. Browman, H.I., & Marcotte, B.M. (1987). The effect of zooplankton abundance on feeding behaviour and prey size selection in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar , alevins. Ecography, 10, 163170. Cerca con Google

20. Calvert, W.H., Hedrick, L.E., & Brouwer, L.P. (1979). Mortality of monarch butterfly (Donaus plexipus L.): avian predation at five overwintering sites in Mexico. Science, 204, 847851. Cerca con Google

21. Cantlon, J.F., & Brannon, E.M. (2006). The effect of heterogeneity on numerical ordering in rhesus monkeys. Infancy, 9, 173189. Cerca con Google

22. Clearfield, M.W., & Mix, K.S. (2001). Amount versus number: infants’ use of area and contour length to discriminate small sets. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 243260. Cerca con Google

23. Clearfield, M.W., & Mix, K.S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infants’ discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10, 408411. Cerca con Google

24. CluttonBrock, T.H., & Parker, G.A. (1992). Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 437456. Cerca con Google

25. Constantz, G.D. (1989). Reproductive biology of poeciliid fishes. In: Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) (Meffe, G. K. & Snelson, F. F., eds). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Cerca con Google

26. Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C.R., & Whalen, J. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both small and large numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 698707. Cerca con Google

27. Davis, H., & Perusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence and a new research agenda. Behavioural Brain Science, 11, 561579. Cerca con Google

28. Davis, H., & Bradford, S.A. (1986). Counting behaviour by rats in a simulated natural environment. Ethology, 73, 265280. Cerca con Google

29. Dehaene, S., DehaeneLamberz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neuroscience, 21, 355361. Cerca con Google

30. Dulzetto, F. (1928). Osservazioni sulla vita sessuale di Gambusia holbrooki. Atti della Repubblica Accademica dei Lincei, 8, 46101. Cerca con Google

31. Duncan, P., & Vigne, N. (1979). The effects of group size in horses on the rates of attack by bloodsucking flies. Animal Behaviour , 27, 623625. Cerca con Google

32. Durgin, F.H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 149169. Cerca con Google

33. Emmerton, J., & Delius, J.D. (1993). Beyond sensation: Visual cognition in pigeons. Vision, brain and behavior in birds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press? H.P. Zeigler & H. Bischof (Eds). Cerca con Google

34. Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2005). On the limits of infants’ quantification of small object arrays. Cognition, 97, 295313. Cerca con Google

35. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E.S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 307314. Cerca con Google

36. Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002a). The representations underlying infants' choice of more: objectfiles versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150156. Cerca con Google

37. Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.S. (2002b). Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 3366. Cerca con Google

38. Flombaum, J.I., Junge, J.A., & Hauser, M.D. (2005). Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta ) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition, 97, 315325. Cerca con Google

39. Foster, W.A., & Treherne, J.E. (1981). Evidence of the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature, 293, 466467. Cerca con Google

40. Gallistel, C.R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Nonverbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 5965. Cerca con Google

41. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C.R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number . Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Massachusetts. Cerca con Google

42. Gentner, T.Q. (2004). Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1016(1), 282302. Cerca con Google

43. Hager, M.C., & Helfman, G.S. (1991). Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory treat. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 271276. Cerca con Google

44. Hamilton, W.D. (1971). Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 295311. Cerca con Google

45. Hanus, D., & Call, J. (2007). Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(3), 241249. Cerca con Google

46. Hauser, M.D., & Spelke, E.S. (2004). Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, Vol. 3. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cerca con Google

47. Hauser, M.D., Tsao, F., Garcia, P., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representations of numerical magnitudes by cottontop tamarins. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 270, 1441446. Cerca con Google

48. Hauser, M.D., Carey, S., & Hauser, L.B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semifreeranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 267, 829833. Cerca con Google

49. Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representation in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 15141517. Cerca con Google

50. Haxby, J. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 5967. Cerca con Google

51. Hoare, D.J., Couzin, I.D., Godin, J.G.J, & Krause, J. (2004). Contextdependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour , 67, 155164. Cerca con Google

52. Houde, A.E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Cerca con Google

53. Hoysak, D.J., & Godin, J.G.J. (2007). Repeatability of male mate choice in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Ethology, 113, 10071018. Cerca con Google

54. Jaakkola, K., Fellner, W., Erb, L., Rodriguez, A.M., & Guarino, E. (2005). Understanding of the concept of numerically “less” by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 296303. Cerca con Google

55. Jordan, K.E., & Brannon, E.M. (2006). Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta ). Animal Cognition, 9, 159172. Cerca con Google

56. Júlia, U.D., Bugnyar, T., & Miklósi, Á. (2007). Counting in Jackdaws: is the mind of a bird capable of spontaneous representation of numerosities? Poster presented at the Ethologische Gesellschaft Meeting “ Social Organization and Cognitive Tools: General Patterns in Vertebrates?” 22 nd 25 th February 2007, Grunau (Austria) . Cerca con Google

57. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, S. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175219. Cerca con Google

58. Kilian, A., Von Fersen, L., & Güntürkün, O. (2005). Left hemispheric advantage for numerical abilities in the bottlenose dolphin. Behavioural Processes, 68, 179184. Cerca con Google

59. Kilian, A., Yaman, S., Fersen, L., & Gunturkun, O. (2003). A bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncates) discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learning and Behaviour , 31, 133142. Cerca con Google

60. Krakauer, D.C. (1995). Groups confuse predators by exploiting perceptual bottlenecks: a connectionist model of the confusion effect. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 421429. Cerca con Google

61. Krebs, J.R., & Davies, N.B. (2002). Etologia e comportamento animale. Boringhieri editore, Torino. Cerca con Google

62. Koehler, O. (1951). The ability of birds to “count”. Bulletin of Animal Behaviour , 9, 4145. Cerca con Google

63. Landeau, L., & Terborgh, J. (1986). Oddity and confusion effect in predation. Animal Behaviour , 34, 13721380. Cerca con Google

64. Lipton, J.S., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Origins of number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396401. Cerca con Google

65. Lloyd, L. (1986). An alternative to insect control by ‘mosquitofish’, Gambusia affinis. Arbovirus Research in Australia , 156163. Cerca con Google

66. Lyon, B.E. (2003). Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature, 422, 495499. Cerca con Google

67. Magurran, A.E., & Seghers, B.H. (1994). Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata , populations in Trinidad. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 255, 3136. Cerca con Google

68. Magurran, A.E., Oulton, W.J., & Pitcher, T.J. (1985). Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 67, 167178. Cerca con Google

69. Marler, P., & Tamura, M. (1962). Song "dialects" in three populations of Whitecrowned sparrows. Condor , 64, 368377. Cerca con Google

70. Mathis, A., & Chivers, D.P. (2002). Overriding the oddity effect in mixedspecies aggregations: group choice by armored and nonarmored prey. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 334339. Cerca con Google

71. McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in the contests between groups of female lions, Panther leo. Animal Behaviour , 47, 379387. Cerca con Google

72. McKinney, F., Derrickson, S.R., & Mineau, P. (1983). Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour , 86, 250294. Cerca con Google

73. Meck, W.H., & Church, R.M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320334. Cerca con Google

74. Milinski, M. (1979). An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks. Zeitschrift fûr Tierpsychologie, 51, 3640. Cerca con Google

75. Mitani, J.C. (1985). Sexual selection and adult male orangutan long calls. Animal Behaviour , 33, 272283. Cerca con Google

76. Morgan, M.J. (1988). The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows. Animal Behaviour , 36, 13171322. Cerca con Google

77. Morgan, M.J., & Colgan, P.W. (1987). The effects of predator presence and shoal size on foraging in bluntnose minnows, Pimephales notatus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 20, 105111. Cerca con Google

78. Neill, S.R.S.J., & Cullen, J.M. (1974). Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. Journal of Zoology, 172, 549569. Cerca con Google

79. Pepperberg, I. (2006). Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Animal Cognition, 9, 377391. Cerca con Google

80. Pepperberg, I.M., & Gordon, J.D. (2005). Numerical comprehension by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zerolike concept. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 197209. Cerca con Google

81. Pilastro, A., Benetton, S., & Bisazza A. (2003). Female aggregation and male competition reduce costs of sexual harassment in the mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. Animal Behaviour , 65, 11611167. Cerca con Google

82. Pitcher, T.J., & Parrish, J.K. (1993). Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, 2nd edn (Pitcher J. K., ed.). Chapman & Hall, London. Cerca con Google

83. Pritchard, V.L., Lawrence, J., Butlin, R.K., & Krause, J. (2001). Shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Animal Behaviour , 62, 10851088. Cerca con Google

84. Pyke, G.H. (2005). A review of the biology of Gambusia affinis and G. holbrooki. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15, 339365. Cerca con Google

85. Reebs, S.G., & Gallant, B.Y. (1997). Foodanticipatory activity as a cue for local enhancement in golden shiners (Pisces: Cyprinidae, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Ethology, 103, 10601069. Cerca con Google

86. Reynolds, W.W., & Casterlin, M.E. (1979). Effect of temperature on locomotor activity in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and the bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus): Presence of an ‘activity well’ in the region of the final preferendum. Hydrobiologia , 65, 35. Cerca con Google

87. Roberts, A.W. (2005). How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection. Behavioural Processes, 69, 3343. Cerca con Google

88. Robins, A., Lippolis, G., Bisazza, A., Vallortigara, G., & Rogers L.J. (1998). Lateralized agonistic responses and hindlimb use in toads. Animal Behaviour , 56, 875881. Cerca con Google

89. Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2007). Rudimental numerical competence in 5dayold domestic chicks: Identification of ordinal position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 2131. Cerca con Google

90. Santos, L.R., Barnes, J.L., & Mahajan, N. (2005). Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species. Animal Cognition, 8, 253262. Cerca con Google

91. Schradin, C. (2000). Confusion effect in a reptilian and a primate predator. Ethology, 106, 691700. Cerca con Google

92. Seghers, B.H. (1974). Schooling behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata ): an evolutionary response to predation. Evolution, 28, 486489. Cerca con Google

93. Shaw, E. (1978). Schooling fishes. American Scientists, 66, 166175. Cerca con Google

94. Sherman, P.W. (1985). Alarm calls of Belding’s ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self preservation? Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 17, 313323. Cerca con Google

95. Smith, C.C. (2007). Independent effects of male and female density on sexual harassment, female fitness, and male competition for mates in the western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 13491358. Cerca con Google

96. Smuts, B.B., & Smuts, R.W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behaviour , 22, 163. Cerca con Google

97. Sokal, R.R., & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry. New York: Freeman and Company. Cerca con Google

98. Sovrano, V.A., Dadda, M., & Bisazza, A. (2005). Lateralized fish perform better than non lateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Behavioural Brain Research, 163, 122127. Cerca con Google

99. Sovrano, V.A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199210. Cerca con Google

100. Stevens, J.R., Wood, J.N., & Hauser, M.D. (2007). When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Animal Cognition, 10, 429437. Cerca con Google

101. Sulkowski, G.M., & Hauser, M.D. (2001). Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously substract? Cognition, 79, 239262. Cerca con Google

102. Sumner, F.B. (1934). Does ‘‘protective coloration’’ protect? Results of some experiments with fishes and birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 20(10), 559564. Cerca con Google

103. Suzuki, K., & Kobayashi, T. (2000). Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis & Bradford (1986) extended. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 7385. Cerca con Google

104. Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Cerca con Google

105. Thornhill, R. (1980). Sexual selection in the blacktipped hanging fly. Scientific American, 242, 162172. Cerca con Google

106. Trendall, J.T. (1982). Covariation of life history traits in the mosquitofish, G. affinis. American Naturalist, 119, 774783. Cerca con Google

107. Trick, L.M., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limitedcapacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80102. Cerca con Google

108. Uller, C., Jaeger, R., Guidry, G., & Martin, C. (2003). Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in a species of basal vertebrate. Animal Cognition, 6, 105112. Cerca con Google

109. Uller, C., Hauser, M.D., & Carey, S. (2001). Spontaneous representation of number in cottontop tamarins. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 110. Cerca con Google

110. Vondracek, B., Wurtsbaugh, W.A., & Cech, J.J. (1988). Growth and reproduction of the mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis, in relation to temperature and ration level: consequences for life history. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 21, 4557. Cerca con Google

111. Vos, P.G., Van Oeffelen, M.P., Tibosch, H.J., & Allik, J. (1988). Areanumerosity interactions. Psychological Research, 50, 148150. Cerca con Google

112. Ward, C., & Smuts, B.B. (2007). Quantitybased judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Animal Cognition, 10, 7180. Cerca con Google

113. West, R.E., & Young, R.J. (2002). Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Animal Cognition, 5, 183186. Cerca con Google

114. Westneat, D.F., Sherman, P.W., & Morton, M.L. (1990). The ecology and evolution of extrapair copulations in birds, Current Ornithology, 7, 331369. Cerca con Google

115. Whalen, J., Gallistel, C.R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: the psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130137. Cerca con Google

116. Wilson, M.L., Britton, N.F., & Franks, N.R. (2002). Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 11071112. Cerca con Google

117. Winn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749750. Cerca con Google

118. Wood, J.N., & Spelke. E.S (2005). Infants’ enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Developmental Science, 8(2), 173181. Cerca con Google

119. Wynn, K., & Chiang, W.C. (1998). Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects: the case of magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9, 448455. Cerca con Google

120. Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89(1), B15B25. Cerca con Google

121. Xu, F., & Spelke, E.S (2000). Large number discrimination in 6monthold infants. Cognition, 74, B1B11. Cerca con Google

1. Abrahams, M.V., & Colgan, P.W. (1985). Risk of predation, hydrodynamic efficiency and their influence on school structure. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 13, 195202. Cerca con Google

2. Agrillo, C., & Dadda, M. (2007). Discrimination of the larger shoal in the poeciliid fish Girardinus falcatus. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 19(2), 145157. Cerca con Google

3. Agrillo, C., Dadda, M., & Bisazza, A. (2006). Sexual harassment influences group choice in female mosquitofish. Ethology, 112, 592598. Cerca con Google

4. Alcock, J. (2001). Etologia: un approccio evolutivo. Zanichelli editore, Bologna. Cerca con Google

5. AlDaham, N.K., Huq, M.F., & Sharma, K.P. (1977). Notes on the ecology of fishes of the genus Aphanius and Gambusia affinis in southern Iraq. Freshwater Biology, 7, 245251. Cerca con Google

6. Alexander, R.D. (1974). The evolution of social behaviour. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325383. Cerca con Google

7. Barth, H., Kanwisher, N., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Construction of large number representations in adults. Cognition, 86, 201221. Cerca con Google

8. Beran, M.J. (2007). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta ) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 4254. Cerca con Google

9. Beran, M.J., & Beran, M.M. (2004). Chimpanzees remember the results of onebyone addition of food items to sets over extended time periods. Psychological Science, 15, 9499. Cerca con Google

10. Bertram, J.C. (1980). Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Animal Behaviour , 28, 278286. Cerca con Google

11. Bertram, J.C. (1978). Living in groups: predators and prey. In Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Krebs, J. & Davies, N. (Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell. Cerca con Google

12. Biro, D., & Matsuzawa, T. (2001). Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Animal Cognition, 4, 193199. Cerca con Google

13. Bisazza, A., Vaccari, G., & Pilastro, A. (2001). Female mate choice in a mating system dominated by male sexual coercion. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 5964. Cerca con Google

14. Bisazza, A., & Marin, G. (1995). Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 7, 169183. Cerca con Google

15. Bisazza, A. (1993). Male competition, female mate choice and sexual size dimorphism in poeciliid fishes. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 23, 257286. Cerca con Google

16. Bisazza, A., Marconato, A., & Marin, G. (1989). Male mate preferences in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Ethology, 83, 335343. Cerca con Google

17. Brannon, E.M., Lutz, D., & Cordes, S. (2006). The development of area discrimination and its implications for numerical abilities in infancy. Developmental Science, 9, F59F64. Cerca con Google

18. Brannon, E.M., & Terrace, H.S. (1998). Ordering of the Numerosities 1 to 9 by Monkeys. Science, 282, 746749. Cerca con Google

19. Browman, H.I., & Marcotte, B.M. (1987). The effect of zooplankton abundance on feeding behaviour and prey size selection in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar , alevins. Ecography, 10, 163170. Cerca con Google

20. Calvert, W.H., Hedrick, L.E., & Brouwer, L.P. (1979). Mortality of monarch butterfly (Donaus plexipus L.): avian predation at five overwintering sites in Mexico. Science, 204, 847851. Cerca con Google

21. Cantlon, J.F., & Brannon, E.M. (2006). The effect of heterogeneity on numerical ordering in rhesus monkeys. Infancy, 9, 173189. Cerca con Google

22. Clearfield, M.W., & Mix, K.S. (2001). Amount versus number: infants’ use of area and contour length to discriminate small sets. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 243260. Cerca con Google

23. Clearfield, M.W., & Mix, K.S. (1999). Number versus contour length in infants’ discrimination of small visual sets. Psychological Science, 10, 408411. Cerca con Google

24. CluttonBrock, T.H., & Parker, G.A. (1992). Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 437456. Cerca con Google

25. Constantz, G.D. (1989). Reproductive biology of poeciliid fishes. In: Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) (Meffe, G. K. & Snelson, F. F., eds). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Cerca con Google

26. Cordes, S., Gelman, R., Gallistel, C.R., & Whalen, J. (2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both small and large numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 698707. Cerca con Google

27. Davis, H., & Perusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence and a new research agenda. Behavioural Brain Science, 11, 561579. Cerca con Google

28. Davis, H., & Bradford, S.A. (1986). Counting behaviour by rats in a simulated natural environment. Ethology, 73, 265280. Cerca con Google

29. Dehaene, S., DehaeneLamberz, G., & Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neuroscience, 21, 355361. Cerca con Google

30. Dulzetto, F. (1928). Osservazioni sulla vita sessuale di Gambusia holbrooki. Atti della Repubblica Accademica dei Lincei, 8, 46101. Cerca con Google

31. Duncan, P., & Vigne, N. (1979). The effects of group size in horses on the rates of attack by bloodsucking flies. Animal Behaviour , 27, 623625. Cerca con Google

32. Durgin, F.H. (1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 149169. Cerca con Google

33. Emmerton, J., & Delius, J.D. (1993). Beyond sensation: Visual cognition in pigeons. Vision, brain and behavior in birds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press? H.P. Zeigler & H. Bischof (Eds). Cerca con Google

34. Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2005). On the limits of infants’ quantification of small object arrays. Cognition, 97, 295313. Cerca con Google

35. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E.S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 307314. Cerca con Google

36. Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002a). The representations underlying infants' choice of more: objectfiles versus analog magnitudes. Psychological Science, 13, 150156. Cerca con Google

37. Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Spelke, E.S. (2002b). Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 3366. Cerca con Google

38. Flombaum, J.I., Junge, J.A., & Hauser, M.D. (2005). Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta ) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition, 97, 315325. Cerca con Google

39. Foster, W.A., & Treherne, J.E. (1981). Evidence of the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature, 293, 466467. Cerca con Google

40. Gallistel, C.R., & Gelman, R. (2000). Nonverbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 5965. Cerca con Google

41. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C.R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number . Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Massachusetts. Cerca con Google

42. Gentner, T.Q. (2004). Neural systems for individual song recognition in adult birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1016(1), 282302. Cerca con Google

43. Hager, M.C., & Helfman, G.S. (1991). Safety in numbers: shoal size choice by minnows under predatory treat. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 271276. Cerca con Google

44. Hamilton, W.D. (1971). Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 295311. Cerca con Google

45. Hanus, D., & Call, J. (2007). Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(3), 241249. Cerca con Google

46. Hauser, M.D., & Spelke, E.S. (2004). Evolutionary and developmental foundations of human knowledge: a case study of mathematics. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, Vol. 3. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cerca con Google

47. Hauser, M.D., Tsao, F., Garcia, P., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representations of numerical magnitudes by cottontop tamarins. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 270, 1441446. Cerca con Google

48. Hauser, M.D., Carey, S., & Hauser, L.B. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semifreeranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 267, 829833. Cerca con Google

49. Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P., & Ware, M. (1996). Numerical representation in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 15141517. Cerca con Google

50. Haxby, J. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 5967. Cerca con Google

51. Hoare, D.J., Couzin, I.D., Godin, J.G.J, & Krause, J. (2004). Contextdependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour , 67, 155164. Cerca con Google

52. Houde, A.E. (1997). Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Cerca con Google

53. Hoysak, D.J., & Godin, J.G.J. (2007). Repeatability of male mate choice in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. Ethology, 113, 10071018. Cerca con Google

54. Jaakkola, K., Fellner, W., Erb, L., Rodriguez, A.M., & Guarino, E. (2005). Understanding of the concept of numerically “less” by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 296303. Cerca con Google

55. Jordan, K.E., & Brannon, E.M. (2006). Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta ). Animal Cognition, 9, 159172. Cerca con Google

56. Júlia, U.D., Bugnyar, T., & Miklósi, Á. (2007). Counting in Jackdaws: is the mind of a bird capable of spontaneous representation of numerosities? Poster presented at the Ethologische Gesellschaft Meeting “ Social Organization and Cognitive Tools: General Patterns in Vertebrates?” 22 nd 25 th February 2007, Grunau (Austria) . Cerca con Google

57. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, S. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175219. Cerca con Google

58. Kilian, A., Von Fersen, L., & Güntürkün, O. (2005). Left hemispheric advantage for numerical abilities in the bottlenose dolphin. Behavioural Processes, 68, 179184. Cerca con Google

59. Kilian, A., Yaman, S., Fersen, L., & Gunturkun, O. (2003). A bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncates) discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learning and Behaviour , 31, 133142. Cerca con Google

60. Krakauer, D.C. (1995). Groups confuse predators by exploiting perceptual bottlenecks: a connectionist model of the confusion effect. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 421429. Cerca con Google

61. Krebs, J.R., & Davies, N.B. (2002). Etologia e comportamento animale. Boringhieri editore, Torino. Cerca con Google

62. Koehler, O. (1951). The ability of birds to “count”. Bulletin of Animal Behaviour , 9, 4145. Cerca con Google

63. Landeau, L., & Terborgh, J. (1986). Oddity and confusion effect in predation. Animal Behaviour , 34, 13721380. Cerca con Google

64. Lipton, J.S., & Spelke, E.S. (2003). Origins of number sense: large number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396401. Cerca con Google

65. Lloyd, L. (1986). An alternative to insect control by ‘mosquitofish’, Gambusia affinis. Arbovirus Research in Australia , 156163. Cerca con Google

66. Lyon, B.E. (2003). Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature, 422, 495499. Cerca con Google

67. Magurran, A.E., & Seghers, B.H. (1994). Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata , populations in Trinidad. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 255, 3136. Cerca con Google

68. Magurran, A.E., Oulton, W.J., & Pitcher, T.J. (1985). Vigilant behaviour and shoal size in minnows. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 67, 167178. Cerca con Google

69. Marler, P., & Tamura, M. (1962). Song "dialects" in three populations of Whitecrowned sparrows. Condor , 64, 368377. Cerca con Google

70. Mathis, A., & Chivers, D.P. (2002). Overriding the oddity effect in mixedspecies aggregations: group choice by armored and nonarmored prey. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 334339. Cerca con Google

71. McComb, K., Packer, C., & Pusey, A. (1994). Roaring and numerical assessment in the contests between groups of female lions, Panther leo. Animal Behaviour , 47, 379387. Cerca con Google

72. McKinney, F., Derrickson, S.R., & Mineau, P. (1983). Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour , 86, 250294. Cerca con Google

73. Meck, W.H., & Church, R.M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320334. Cerca con Google

74. Milinski, M. (1979). An evolutionarily stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks. Zeitschrift fûr Tierpsychologie, 51, 3640. Cerca con Google

75. Mitani, J.C. (1985). Sexual selection and adult male orangutan long calls. Animal Behaviour , 33, 272283. Cerca con Google

76. Morgan, M.J. (1988). The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows. Animal Behaviour , 36, 13171322. Cerca con Google

77. Morgan, M.J., & Colgan, P.W. (1987). The effects of predator presence and shoal size on foraging in bluntnose minnows, Pimephales notatus. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 20, 105111. Cerca con Google

78. Neill, S.R.S.J., & Cullen, J.M. (1974). Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. Journal of Zoology, 172, 549569. Cerca con Google

79. Pepperberg, I. (2006). Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Animal Cognition, 9, 377391. Cerca con Google

80. Pepperberg, I.M., & Gordon, J.D. (2005). Numerical comprehension by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zerolike concept. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 197209. Cerca con Google

81. Pilastro, A., Benetton, S., & Bisazza A. (2003). Female aggregation and male competition reduce costs of sexual harassment in the mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. Animal Behaviour , 65, 11611167. Cerca con Google

82. Pitcher, T.J., & Parrish, J.K. (1993). Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Behaviour of Teleost Fishes, 2nd edn (Pitcher J. K., ed.). Chapman & Hall, London. Cerca con Google

83. Pritchard, V.L., Lawrence, J., Butlin, R.K., & Krause, J. (2001). Shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Animal Behaviour , 62, 10851088. Cerca con Google

84. Pyke, G.H. (2005). A review of the biology of Gambusia affinis and G. holbrooki. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15, 339365. Cerca con Google

85. Reebs, S.G., & Gallant, B.Y. (1997). Foodanticipatory activity as a cue for local enhancement in golden shiners (Pisces: Cyprinidae, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Ethology, 103, 10601069. Cerca con Google

86. Reynolds, W.W., & Casterlin, M.E. (1979). Effect of temperature on locomotor activity in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) and the bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus): Presence of an ‘activity well’ in the region of the final preferendum. Hydrobiologia , 65, 35. Cerca con Google

87. Roberts, A.W. (2005). How do pigeons represent numbers? Studies of number scale bisection. Behavioural Processes, 69, 3343. Cerca con Google

88. Robins, A., Lippolis, G., Bisazza, A., Vallortigara, G., & Rogers L.J. (1998). Lateralized agonistic responses and hindlimb use in toads. Animal Behaviour , 56, 875881. Cerca con Google

89. Rugani, R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2007). Rudimental numerical competence in 5dayold domestic chicks: Identification of ordinal position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33(1), 2131. Cerca con Google

90. Santos, L.R., Barnes, J.L., & Mahajan, N. (2005). Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species. Animal Cognition, 8, 253262. Cerca con Google

91. Schradin, C. (2000). Confusion effect in a reptilian and a primate predator. Ethology, 106, 691700. Cerca con Google

92. Seghers, B.H. (1974). Schooling behavior in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata ): an evolutionary response to predation. Evolution, 28, 486489. Cerca con Google

93. Shaw, E. (1978). Schooling fishes. American Scientists, 66, 166175. Cerca con Google

94. Sherman, P.W. (1985). Alarm calls of Belding’s ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self preservation? Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 17, 313323. Cerca con Google

95. Smith, C.C. (2007). Independent effects of male and female density on sexual harassment, female fitness, and male competition for mates in the western mosquitofish Gambusia affinis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 13491358. Cerca con Google

96. Smuts, B.B., & Smuts, R.W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behaviour , 22, 163. Cerca con Google

97. Sokal, R.R., & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry. New York: Freeman and Company. Cerca con Google

98. Sovrano, V.A., Dadda, M., & Bisazza, A. (2005). Lateralized fish perform better than non lateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Behavioural Brain Research, 163, 122127. Cerca con Google

99. Sovrano, V.A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199210. Cerca con Google

100. Stevens, J.R., Wood, J.N., & Hauser, M.D. (2007). When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cottontop tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Animal Cognition, 10, 429437. Cerca con Google

101. Sulkowski, G.M., & Hauser, M.D. (2001). Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously substract? Cognition, 79, 239262. Cerca con Google

102. Sumner, F.B. (1934). Does ‘‘protective coloration’’ protect? Results of some experiments with fishes and birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 20(10), 559564. Cerca con Google

103. Suzuki, K., & Kobayashi, T. (2000). Numerical competence in rats (Rattus norvegicus): Davis & Bradford (1986) extended. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 7385. Cerca con Google

104. Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Cerca con Google

105. Thornhill, R. (1980). Sexual selection in the blacktipped hanging fly. Scientific American, 242, 162172. Cerca con Google

106. Trendall, J.T. (1982). Covariation of life history traits in the mosquitofish, G. affinis. American Naturalist, 119, 774783. Cerca con Google

107. Trick, L.M., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limitedcapacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80102. Cerca con Google

108. Uller, C., Jaeger, R., Guidry, G., & Martin, C. (2003). Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in a species of basal vertebrate. Animal Cognition, 6, 105112. Cerca con Google

109. Uller, C., Hauser, M.D., & Carey, S. (2001). Spontaneous representation of number in cottontop tamarins. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 110. Cerca con Google

110. Vondracek, B., Wurtsbaugh, W.A., & Cech, J.J. (1988). Growth and reproduction of the mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis, in relation to temperature and ration level: consequences for life history. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 21, 4557. Cerca con Google

111. Vos, P.G., Van Oeffelen, M.P., Tibosch, H.J., & Allik, J. (1988). Areanumerosity interactions. Psychological Research, 50, 148150. Cerca con Google

112. Ward, C., & Smuts, B.B. (2007). Quantitybased judgments in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Animal Cognition, 10, 7180. Cerca con Google

113. West, R.E., & Young, R.J. (2002). Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Animal Cognition, 5, 183186. Cerca con Google

114. Westneat, D.F., Sherman, P.W., & Morton, M.L. (1990). The ecology and evolution of extrapair copulations in birds, Current Ornithology, 7, 331369. Cerca con Google

115. Whalen, J., Gallistel, C.R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: the psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130137. Cerca con Google

116. Wilson, M.L., Britton, N.F., & Franks, N.R. (2002). Chimpanzees and the mathematics of battle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 11071112. Cerca con Google

117. Winn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749750. Cerca con Google

118. Wood, J.N., & Spelke. E.S (2005). Infants’ enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. Developmental Science, 8(2), 173181. Cerca con Google

119. Wynn, K., & Chiang, W.C. (1998). Limits to infants’ knowledge of objects: the case of magical appearance. Psychological Science, 9, 448455. Cerca con Google

120. Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89(1), B15B25. Cerca con Google

121. Xu, F., & Spelke, E.S (2000). Large number discrimination in 6monthold infants. Cognition, 74, B1B11. Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record

EPrints Logo
Padua@Research is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.