Go to the content. | Move to the navigation | Go to the site search | Go to the menu | Contacts | Accessibility

| Create Account

Volpin, Cristina (2014) Evidence and Proof in EU Competition Law: Between Public and Private Enforcement. [Ph.D. thesis]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Preview
PDF Document - Submitted Version
1676Kb

Abstract (italian or english)

This thesis identifies the major evidential issues of EU competition law enforcement and the principles and rules on proof followed by the CJEU and the national courts to solve them. Analising the case law, the thesis considers how the decisions of the Luxembourg Courts influence the evaluation of evidence of English and Italian judges, both in the public and the private enforcement. Chapter I, after clarifying which rules govern evidential issues before the different authorities, tackles the nature of evidence and criticises its characterisation according to the traditional substance-procedure dichotomy. Chapter II explores the reasons why a significant degree of convergence is reached, well beyond the effet utile standard, by the case law of the CJEU and that of the analysed countries (England/Wales and Italy). It also shows that the peculiarities of the enforcement of EU competition law and the crucial role played by evidence in this field are important factors promoting the process of convergence. In Chapter III, the analysis is extended to the gathering of evidence. In this phase, despite the diversity characterising the national administrative procedures, convergence is promoted, on the one hand, by the coordination mechanisms provided by EU law to foster the free movement of evidence and, on the other, by the fundamental rights standards that Member States are bound to follow. The conclusions show how, having been tested by means of judicial integration, the adoption of uniform rules of evidence in EU competition law, complementing Article 2 of Regulation (EC) 1/2003, is conceivable and desirable.

Abstract (a different language)

La tesi esamina vari aspetti relativi alla prova nel diritto europeo della concorrenza, riguardo ai quali principi e regole comuni vengono adottate sia dalla Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione Europea che dalle corti nazionali. Attraverso l’analisi delle decisioni in materia di concorrenza, la tesi considera l’influenza esercitata dalla giurisprudenza della Corte di Lussemburgo sulla valutazione delle prove in due giurisdizioni nazionali, quella inglese e quella italiana, sia nel public che nel private enforcement. Il primo capitolo, dopo aver illustrato i regimi probatori applicati dalle diverse autorità, affronta il problema della natura della prova e propone una critica della tradizionale rigida distinzione tra profili sostanziali e procedurali. Il secondo capitolo esplora le ragioni per le quali un considerevole livello di convergenza viene raggiunto tra la giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione Europea e la giurisprudenza delle corti degli Stati membri analizzati, ben oltre il rispetto del principio dell’effetto utile. Secondo la ricostruzione riproposta, il ruolo cruciale giocato dalla prova in questo campo e le peculiarità del sistema europeo della concorrenza sono fattori determinanti nel processo di ravvicinamento delle discipline probatorie. Nel terzo capitolo, l’analisi si sofferma sull’acquisizione e formazione della prova. In fase di raccolta della prova, nonostante la diversità che caratterizza i procedimenti amministrativi nazionali, la convergenza è stimolata, da un lato, dagli strumenti europei che promuovono la libera circolazione della prova e, dall’altro, dalla tutela dei diritti fondamentali che gli Stati membri sono tenuti a rispettare. L’analisi porta a concludere che alcuni principi uniformi in tema di prova nel diritto europeo della concorrenza siano già osservati dai giudici nazionali e che un corpo di norme comuni dovrebbe essere adottato, ad integrazione della scarna disciplina della prova contenuta nel Regolamento (CE) 1/2003.

Statistiche Download
EPrint type:Ph.D. thesis
Tutor:Forlati, Serena
Ph.D. course:Ciclo 26 > Scuole 26 > DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE E DIRITTO PRIVATO E DEL LAVORO
Data di deposito della tesi:29 January 2014
Anno di Pubblicazione:29 January 2014
Key Words:EU Competition Law, Evidence, Proof, Comparison between Public and Private Enforcement, Procedural Convergence, Diritto europeo della concorrenza, regole sulla prova, la prova nel diritto antitrust
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 12 - Scienze giuridiche > IUS/14 Diritto dell'Unione Europea
Area 12 - Scienze giuridiche > IUS/13 Diritto internazionale
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche, Giuridiche e Studi Internazionali
Codice ID:6621
Depositato il:20 Sep 2016 14:34
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

ANDREANGELI, ARIANNA, EU Competition Enforcement and Human Rights (Edward Elgar 2008). Cerca con Google

BACON, KELYN, ‘Standard of Proof, Standards of Review and Evaluation of Evidence in UK Antitrust and Merger Cases’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011). Cerca con Google

BAILEY, DAVID, ‘Scope of Judicial Review under Article 81 EC’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review, 1327. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Presumptions in EU Competition Law’ (2010) 31 European Competition Law Review, 362. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Single, Overall Agreement in EU Competition Law’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review, 473. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Restrictions of Competition by Object under Article 101 TFEU’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 559. Cerca con Google

BARBIER DE LA SERRE, ERIC, and ANNE-LISE SIBONY, ‘Charge de la preuve et théorie du contrôle en droit communautaire de la concurrence : pour un changement de perspective’ [2007] Revue trimestrielle de droit européen. Cerca con Google

BARBIER, ERIC, and ANNE-LISE SIBONY, ‘Expert Evidence Before the EC Courts’ [2008] Common Market Law Review. Cerca con Google

BARIATTI, STEFANIA, ‘Problemi di giurisdizione e di diritto internazionale privato nell’azione antitrust’ in LORENZO FEDERICO PACE (ed), Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 267. Cerca con Google

BASEDOW, JÜRGEN, ‘Private Enforcement of Article 81 EC: A German View’ in European Competition Law Annual 2001: Effective Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law, 2003, 137. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Recognition of Foreign Decisions within the European Competition Network’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2011). Cerca con Google

——, ‘International Cartels and the Place of Acting under Article 5(3) of the Brussels I Regulation’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

BERNATT, MACIEJ, ‘Convergence of Procedural Standards in the European Competition Proceedings’ (2012) 8 Competition Law Review, 255. Cerca con Google

BESTAGNO, FRANCESCO, ‘L’azione risarcitoria come strumento di private enforcement della disciplina di diritto dell’UE sugli aiuti di Stato’ (2013) 27 Diritto del commercio internazionale, 623. Cerca con Google

BIAVATI, PAOLO, ‘Il diritto processuale e la tutela dei diritti in materia di concorrenza’ [2007] Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 97. Cerca con Google

——, ‘L’impatto del diritto comunitario sull’insegnamento del diritto processuale civile’ [2008] Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 227. Cerca con Google

——, Diritto processuale dell’Unione Europea (Giuffré 2009). Cerca con Google

——, ‘Civil law e common law sullo sfondo del diritto dell’Unione Europea: un incontro alla pari?’ (2009) Supplemento ‘Due iceberg a confronto: le derive di common law e civil law’ Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 135. Cerca con Google

BLANKE, GORDON, and RENATO NAZZINI, eds., International Competition Litigation - A Multijurisdictional Handbook (Wolters Kluwer 2012). Cerca con Google

BÖGE, ULF, ‘Leniency Programmes and the Private Enforcement of European Competition Law’ in JÜRGEN BASEDOW (ed), Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law, vol. 25 (Klumer Law International 2007), 217. Cerca con Google

BONATTI, ROBERTO, ‘La libera circolazione della prova nel nuovo regolamento europeo sulla concorrenza’ [2006] Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 193. Cerca con Google

BRIGGS, ADRIAN, The Conflict of Laws (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2013). Cerca con Google

BRINKMANN, MORITZ, ‘The Synthesis of Common and Civil Law Standard of Proof Formulae in the ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure’ (2004) 9 Uniform Law Review, 875. Cerca con Google

BRKAN, MAJA, ‘Procedural Aspects of Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law: Heading Toward New Reforms?’ (2005) 28 World Competition, 479. Cerca con Google

BRONCKERS, MARCO, and ANNE VALLERY, ‘No Longer Presumed Guilty? The Impact of Fundamental Rights on Certain Dogmas of EU Competition Law’ (2011) 34 World Competition, 535. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Fair and Effective Competition Policy in the EU: Which Role for Authorities and Which Role for the Courts after Menarini?’ (2012) 8 European Competition Journal, 283. Cerca con Google

BROWN, CHESTER, A Common Law of International Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2007). Cerca con Google

BRUZZONE, GINEVRA, and MARCO BOCCACCIO, ‘Impact-Based Assessment and Use of Legal Presumptions in EC Competition Law: The Search for the Proper Mix’ (2009) 32 World Competition, 465. Cerca con Google

BUCCIROSSI, PAOLO, ‘Chi ha paura dell’econometria?’ in I rimedi civilistici agli illeciti anticoncorrenziali. Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Atti del III Convegno di Studio presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Trento 15-16 aprile 2011 (Cedam 2012), 203. Cerca con Google

BULST, FRIEDRICH WENZEL, ‘Of Arms and Armour - The European Commission’s White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach of EC Antitrust Law’ (2008) 2 Bucerius Law Journal, 81. Cerca con Google

CAIAZZO, RINO, ‘L’azione risarcitoria, l’onere della prova e gli strumenti processuali ai sensi del diritto italiano’ in Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 324. Cerca con Google

CANNIZZARO, ENZO, ‘Sui rapporti fra sistemi processuali nazionali e diritto dell’Unione Europea’ [2008] Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea, 447. Cerca con Google

CANNIZZARO, ENZO, and LORENZO FEDERICO PACE, ‘Le politiche di concorrenza’ in GIROLAMO STROZZI (ed), Diritto dell’Unione Europea - Parte speciale (3rd edn, Giappichelli 2010). Cerca con Google

CARATTA, ANTONIO, ‘Prova e convincimento del giudice nel processo civile’ [2003] Rivista di diritto processuale, 27. Cerca con Google

CARVALHO CHEHAB, GUSTAVO, ‘O princípio da não discriminaçao e o ônus da prova’ (2010) 76 Revista do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho, 52. Cerca con Google

CASETTA, ELIO, Manuale di diritto amministrativo (6th edn, Giuffrè 2004). Cerca con Google

CASTILLO DE LA TORRE, FERNANDO, ‘La relevé d’office par la juridiction communautaire’ (2005) 3-4 Cahiers de droit européen, 395. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in Cartel Cases’ (2009) 32 World Competition, 505. Cerca con Google

CATALLOZZI, PAOLO, ‘Il giudice competente nel processo antitrust’ in Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 275. Cerca con Google

CHALMERS, DAMIAN, CHRISTOS HADJIEMMANUIL, GIORGIO MONTI, and ADAM TOMKINS, European Union Law: Text and Materials (Cambridge University Press 2006). Cerca con Google

CHOO, ANDREW L.-T., Evidence (Oxford University Press 2009). Cerca con Google

CLARKE, STEPHEN R, and JOHN M NORMAN, ‘Optimal Challenges in Tennis’ (2012) 63 Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1765. Cerca con Google

CLERMONT, KEVIN M., ‘Standards of Proof Revisited’ (2009) 33 Vermont Law Review. Cerca con Google

COLLINS, MICHAEL M., ‘The Burden and Standard of Proof in Competition Litigation and Problems of Judicial Evaluation’ (2004) 5 ERA Forum, 66. Cerca con Google

COMOGLIO, LUIGI PAOLO, Le prove civili (3rd edn, UTET Giuridica 2010). Cerca con Google

CONDINANZI, MASSIMO, and ROBERTO MASTROIANNI, Il contenzioso dell’Unione Europea (Giappichelli 2009). Cerca con Google

CORTESE, BERNARDO, ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil in EU Competition Law: the Parent Subsidiary Relationship and Antitrust Liability’ in BERNARDO CORTESE (ed), EU Competition Law (Wolters Kluwer 2014), 73. Cerca con Google

COSMA, HÅKON A., and RICHARD WHISH, ‘Soft Law in the Field of EU Competition Policy’ (2003) 14 European Business Law Review, 25. Cerca con Google

CRAIG, PAUL, ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Competence, Procedure and Substance’ (2013) 36 Fordham International Law Journal, 1114. Cerca con Google

CRANE, DANIEL A., and HERBERT HOVENKAMP, eds., The Making of Competition Policy - Legal and Economic Sources (Oxford University Press 2013). Cerca con Google

CUMMING, GEORGE, and MIRJAM FREUDENTHAL, Civil Procedure in EU Competition Cases before the English and Dutch Courts, vol. 42 (Klumer Law International 2010). Cerca con Google

CUMMING, GEORGE, and BRAD SPITZ, eds., Civil Procedure Used for Enforcement of EC Competition Law by the English, French and German Civil Courts, vol. 24 (Kluwer Law International 2007). Cerca con Google

DANOV, MIHAIL, ‘EU competition law enforcement: Is Brussels I suited to dealing with all the challenges?’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 27. Cerca con Google

DANOV, MIHAIL, FLORIAN BECKER, and PAUL BEAUMONT, eds., Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions (Hart Publishing 2013). Cerca con Google

DECKER, CHRISTOPHER, Economics and the Enforcement of European Competition Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2009). Cerca con Google

DE HERT, PAUL, and FISNIK KORENICA, ‘The Doctrine of Equivalent Protection: Its Life and Legitimacy before and after the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 13 German Law Journal, 874. Cerca con Google

DEKEYSER, KRIS, and MARIA JASPERS, ‘A New Era of ECN Cooperation - Achievements and Challenges with Special Focus on Work in the Leniency Field’ (2007) 30 World Competition, 3. Cerca con Google

DENNIS, IAN, The Law of Evidence (3rd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2007). Cerca con Google

DER VIJVER, TJARDA VAN, ‘Article 102 TFEU: How to Claim the Application of Objective Justifications in the Case of prima facie Dominance Abuse?’ (2013) 4 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 121. Cerca con Google

DERVORT, THOMAS R. VAN, American Law and the Legal System: Equal Justice Under the Law (Cengage Learning 2000). Cerca con Google

DE STEFANO, FRANCO, Gli strumenti di prova e la nuova testimonianza scritta (Giuffrè 2009). Cerca con Google

DOUGLAS-SCOTT, SIONAIDH, ‘A Tale of Two Courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the Growing European Human Rights Acquis’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, 629. Cerca con Google

DREXL, JOSEF, BEATRIZ CONDE GALLEGO, STEFAN ENCHELMAIER, MARK-OLIVER MACKENRODT, and RUPPRECHT PODSZUN, ‘Comments by the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law on European Commission’s White Paper’ (2008) 39 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 799. Cerca con Google

ECONOMIDES, NICHOLAS, and LAWRENCE J. WHITE, ‘Access and Interconnection Pricing: How Efficient is the “Efficient Component Pricing Rule”?’ (1995) 40 The Antitrust Bulletin, 557. Cerca con Google

EHLERMANN, CLAUS-DIETER, and ISABELLA ATANASIU, eds., European Competition Law Annual 2001: Effective Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law (Hart Publishing 2003). Cerca con Google

FALLON, MARC, and STÉPHANIE FRANCQ, ‘Private Enforcement of Antitrust Provisions and the Rome I Regulation’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

FAULL, JONATHAN, and ALI NIKPAY, eds., The EC Law of Competition (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2007). Cerca con Google

FONGARO, ERIC, La loi applicable à la preuve en droit international privé (L.G.D.J. 2004). Cerca con Google

FORRESTER, IAN, ‘Due Process in EC Competition Cases: a Distinguished Institution with Flawed Procedures’ (2009) 34 European Law Review, 817. Cerca con Google

——, ‘A Bush in Need of Pruning: the Luxuriant Growth of “Light Judicial Review”’ in CLAUS-DIETER EHLERMANN and MEL MARQUIS (eds), European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011), 407. Cerca con Google

FORWOOD, NICHOLAS, ‘The Court of First Instance, its Development, and Future Role in the Legal Architecture of the European Union’ in ANTHONY ARNULL and others (eds), Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacob (Oxford University Press 2008). Cerca con Google

——, ‘The Commission’s “More Economic Approach” - Implications for the Role of the EU Courts, the Treatment of Economic Evidence and the Scope of Judicial Review’ in by by CLAUS-DIETER EHLERMANN and MEL MARQUIS, European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011). Cerca con Google

FRANCQ, STÉPHANIE, and WOLFGANG WURMNEST, ‘International Antitrust Claims under the Rome II Regulation’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

FRANZINA, PIETRO, La giurisdizione in materia contrattuale - L’art. 5 n. 1 del regolamento n. 44/2001/CE nella prospettiva della armonia delle decisioni (Cedam 2006). Cerca con Google

FRIGNANI, ALDO, ‘L’onere della prova nelle cause risarcitorie da illecito antitrust’ in I rimedi civilistici agli illeciti anticoncorrenziali. Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Atti del III Convegno di Studio presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Trento 15-16 aprile 2011 (Cedam 2012), 53. Cerca con Google

FRIGNANI, ALDO, and STEFANIA BARIATTI, eds., Disciplina della concorrenza nella UE (Cedam 2012). Cerca con Google

FURSE, MARK, Competition Law of the EC and UK (5th edn, Oxford University Press 2006). Cerca con Google

GARNETT, RICHARD, Substance and Procedure in Private International Law (Oxford University Press 2012). Cerca con Google

GAVIL, ANDREW I., ‘The Challenges of Economic Proof in a Decentralized and Privatized European Competition Policy System: Lessons from the American Experience’ (2008) 4 Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 177. Cerca con Google

GERARD, DAMIEN, ‘Regulation 1/2003 (and Beyond): Balancing Effective Enforcement and Due Process in Cross-border Antitrust Investigations’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

GIANNAKOPOULOS, THEMISTOKLIS K., Safeguarding Companies’ Rights in Competition and Anti-dumping/Anti-subsidies Proceedings (Klumer Law International 2011). Cerca con Google

GINSBURG, DOUGLAS H., and JOSHUA D. WRIGHT, ‘Antitrust Sanctions’ (2012) 8 Competition Policy International, 46. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Antitrust Courts: Specialists versus Generalists’ (2013) 36 Fordham International Law Journal, 788. Cerca con Google

GIPPINI-FOURNIER, ERIC, ‘The Elusive Standard of Proof in EU Competition Cases’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases, 2011, 295. Cerca con Google

GIUDICI, PAOLO, ‘Private Antitrust Enforcement in Italy’ (2004) 1 Competition Law Review, 61. Cerca con Google

GROSSEN, JACQUES-MICHEL, Les présomptions en droit international public (Delachaux & Niestlé 1954). Cerca con Google

HARDING, CHRISTOPHER, and JULIAN JOSHUA, Regulating Cartels in Europe (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2010). Cerca con Google

HARLOW, CAROL, and RICHARD RAWLINGS, Law and Administration (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009). Cerca con Google

HELLSTRÖM, PER, ‘A Uniform Standard of Proof in EU Competition Proceedings’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases, 2010. Cerca con Google

HEYDON, JOHN DYSON, Cross on Evidence (9th edn, LexisNexis Butterworths 2013). Cerca con Google

HIRST, NICHOLAS, ‘Donau Chemie: National Rules Impeding Access to Antitrust Files Liable to Breach EU Law’ (2013) 4 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 484. Cerca con Google

HOFMANN, HERWIG C.H., GERARD C. ROWE, and ALEXANDER H. TÜRK, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union (Oxford University Press 2011). Cerca con Google

IDOT, LAURENCE, ‘Access to Evidence and Files of Competition Authorities’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

ILLMER, MARTIN, ‘Neutrality Matters - Some Thoughts about the Rome Regulations and the So-Called Dichotomy of Substance and Procedure in European Private International Law’ (2009) 28 Civil Justice Quarterly, 237. Cerca con Google

JACOBS, FRANCIS G., and THOMAS DEISENHOFER, ‘Procedural Aspects of the Effective Private Enforcement of EC Competition Rules: A Community Perspective’ in European Competition Law Annual 2001: Effective Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law, 2003. Cerca con Google

JACOBSEN, PETER STIG, and MORTEN BROBERG, ‘The Concept of Agreement in Article 81 EC: On the Manufacturer’s Right to Prevent Parallel Trade within the European Community’ (2002) 23 European Competition Law Review, 127. Cerca con Google

JAEGER, MARC, ‘The Court of First Instance and the Management of Competition Law Litigation’ in HEIKKI KANNINEN and others (eds), EU Competition Law in Context: Essays in Honour of Virpi Tiili (Hart Publishing 2009), 1. Cerca con Google

JONES, ALISON, and BRENDA SUFIN, EU Competition Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press 2011). Cerca con Google

KEANE, ADRIAN, and PAUL McKEOWN, The Modern Law of Evidence (Oxford University Press 2012). Cerca con Google

KEYNES, JOHN MAYNARD, A Treatise on Probability (MacMillan and Co. Ltd. 1921). Cerca con Google

KLAWITER, DONALD C., and JENNIFER M. DRISCOLL, ‘Sentencing Individuals In Antitrust Cases: The Proper Balance’ (2009) 23 Antitrust, 75. Cerca con Google

KOMNINOS, ASSIMAKIS P., EC Private Antitrust Enforcement, 2008. Cerca con Google

——, EC Private Antitrust Enforcement: Decentralised Application of EC Competition Law by National Courts (Hart Publishing Limited 2008). Cerca con Google

——, ‘Relationship between Public and Private Enforcement: quod Dei Deo, quod Caesaris Caesari’ (2014) forthcoming European Competition Law Annual 2011: Integrating Public and Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Implications for Courts and Agencies. Cerca con Google

KORAH, VALENTINE, EC Competition Law and Practice (7th edn, Hart Publishing 2000). Cerca con Google

KRAUSKOPF, PATRICK L., and ANDREA TKACIKOVA, ‘Competition Law Violations and Private Enforcement: Forum Shopping Strategies’ (2011) 4 Global Competition Litigation Review, 26. Cerca con Google

KROLL, STEFAN, ‘The Burden of Proof for the Non-Conformity of Goods under Article 35 CISG’ (2011) 59 Belgrade Law Review, 162. Cerca con Google

LASOK, KPE, ‘Some Procedural Aspects and How They Could/Should be Reformed’ in Cross-border EU Competition Law Actions (Hart Publishing 2013), 207. Cerca con Google

LEANDRO, ANTONIO, ‘Articolo 18, Onere della prova’ in FRANCESCO SALERNO and PIETRO FRANZINA (eds) Commentario al Regolamento (CE) 593/2008 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio del 17 giugno 2008 sulla legge applicabile alle obbligazioni contrattuali (Roma I) [2009] Nuove Leggi Civili Commentate, 886. Cerca con Google

LEBRE DE FREITAS, JOSÉ, ed., The Law of Evidence in the European Union (Kluwer Law International 2004). Cerca con Google

LENAERTS, KOEN, ‘Some Thoughts on Evidence and Procedure in European Community Competition Law’ (2006) 30 Fordham International Law Journal, 1463. Cerca con Google

LEONI, ANNALAURA, ‘La tutela giurisdizionale contro gli atti dell’AGCM in materia antitrust’ in LORENZO FEDERICO PACE (ed), Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 419. Cerca con Google

LIANOS, IOANNIS, ‘“Judging” Economists: Economic Expertise in Competition Law Litigation: A European View’ in IOANNIS LIANOS and IOANNIS KOKKORIS (eds), The Reform of EC Competition Law (Kluwer Law International 2010). Cerca con Google

——, ‘Observations of Ioannis Lianos’ (presented at the Workshop on the Quantification of Antitrust Harm in Actions for Damages European Commission Directorate-General for Competition January 26, 2010). Cerca con Google

LIANOS, IOANNIS, and CHRISTOS GENAKOS, ‘Econometric Evidence in EU Competition Law: an Empirical and Theoretical Analysis’ [2012] CLES Working Paper Series 6/2012. Cerca con Google

LIBERTINI, MARIO, ‘Adeguata istruttoria e standard probatori nei procedimenti antitrust’ (2008) 10 Giornale di diritto amministrativo, 1105. Cerca con Google

LOMBARDO, LUIGI, ‘Profili delle prove civili atipiche’ [2009] Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 1447. Cerca con Google

LOWE, PHILIP, ‘Taking Sound Decisions on the Basis of Available Evidence’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011), 157. Cerca con Google

MACCULLOCH, ANGUS, BARRY RODGER, KIRSTY MIDDLETON, and JONATHAN GALLOWAY, Cases & Materials on UK & EC Competition Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2009). Cerca con Google

MAGGIOLINO, MARIATERESA, ‘Standard probatori: alcuni spunti di riflessione per e da il diritto della concorrenza’ (2013) 40 Giurisprudenza commerciale, 51. Cerca con Google

MANDRIOLI, CRISANTO, Il processo di cognizione, vol. II (6th edn, Giappichelli 2007). Cerca con Google

MARCO COLINO, SANDRA, Competition Law of the EU and UK (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2011). Cerca con Google

MARCOS, FRANCISCO, and ALBERT SÁNCHEZ GRAELLS, ‘Towards a European Tort Law? Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules: Harmonizing Tort Law through the Back Door?’ (2008) 16 European Review of Private Law, 469. Cerca con Google

MARSDEN, PHILIP, and LIZA LOVDAHL GORMSEN, ‘Guidance on Abuse in Europe: the Continued Concern for Rivalry and a Competitive Structure’ (2010) 55 Antitrust Bulletin, 875. Cerca con Google

MAWDESLEY BEST, WILLIAM, A Treatise on the Principles of Evidence and Practice as to Proofs in Courts of Common Law (Garland Publishing 1854). Cerca con Google

MEHDI, ROSTANE, ‘La prevue devant les juridictions communautaires’ in HÉLÈNE RUIZ FABRI and JEAN-MARC SOREL (eds), La preuve devant les juridictions internationales (A. Pedone 2007). Cerca con Google

MONTAG, FRANK, ‘The Case for a Radical Reform of the Infringement Procedure Under Regulation 17’ (1996) 17 European Competition Law Review, 428. Cerca con Google

MONTI, GIORGIO, ‘Article 82 EC: What Future for the Effects-Based Approach?’ (2010) 1 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2. Cerca con Google

MUNARI, FRANCESCO, ‘Antitrust Enforcement after the Entry into Force of Regulation (EC) 1/2003: the Interplay between the Commission and the NCAs and the Need for an Enhanced Role of National Courts’ in BERNARDO CORTESE (ed), EU Competition Law (Wolters Kluwer 2014), 111. Cerca con Google

MUNDAY, RODERICK, Evidence (Oxford University Press 2007). Cerca con Google

MURPHY, PETER, and RICHARD GLOVER, Murphy on Evidence (12th edn, Oxford University Press 2011). Cerca con Google

NAGY, CSONGOR ISTVÁN, ‘The Distinction between Anti-competitiveObject and Effect after Allianz: the End of Coherence in Competition Analysis’ (2013) 36 World Competition, 541. Cerca con Google

NAZZINI, Renato, The Foundations of European Union Competition Law: The Objective and Principles of Article 102 (Oxford University Press 2011). Cerca con Google

NIBOYET, MARIE-LAURE, ‘Contre le dogme de la lex fori en matière de procèdure’ in Vers de nouveaux équilibres entre ordres juridiques. Liber amicorum Hélène Gaudemet-Tallon (Dalloz-Sirey 2008), 363. Cerca con Google

NUYTS, ARNAUD, and JOE SEPULCHRE, ‘Taking of Evidence in the European Union under EC Regulation 1206/2001’ (2004) 5 Business Law International, 305. Cerca con Google

Ó CAOIMH, AINDRIAS, ‘Standard of Proof, Burden of Proof, Standard of Review and Evaluation of Evidence in Antritrust and Merger Cases; Perspective of Court of Justice of the European Union’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011), 271. Cerca con Google

O’KANE, MICHAEL, The Law of Criminal Cartels - Practice and Procedure (Oxford University Press 2009). Cerca con Google

ODUDU, OKEOGHENE, The Boundaries of EC Competition Law - The Scope of Article 81 (Oxford University Press 2006). Cerca con Google

ORTIZ BLANCO, LUIZ, European Community Competition Procedure (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006). Cerca con Google

——, ‘Standards of Proof and Personal Conviction in EU Antitrust and Merger Control Procedures’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011), 175. Cerca con Google

PARRET, LAURA, ‘Sense and Nonsense of Rules on Proof in Cartel Cases’ (2008) DP 4/2008 Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) Research Paper Series. Cerca con Google

PERA, ALBERTO, ‘Decisioni con impegni e private antitrust enforcement’ in I rimedi civilistici agli illeciti anticoncorrenziali. Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Atti del III Convegno di Studio presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Trento 15-16 aprile 2011 (Cedam 2012), 103. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Le decisioni con impegni e il rilievo per l’antitrust private enforcement’ in LORENZO FEDERICO PACE (ed), Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 379. Cerca con Google

PERA, ALBERTO, and GIULIA CODACCI PISANELLI, ‘Decisioni con impegni e private enforcement nel diritto antitrust’ (2012) 1 Mercato concorrenza regole, 69. Cerca con Google

PÉREZ GARZÓN, CARLOS ANDRÉS, ‘Aspectos generales sobre la carga de la prueba en el derecho probatorio colombiano’ (2013) 1 Justicia y Derecho, 46. Cerca con Google

PÉREZ RESTREPO, JULIANA, ‘La carga dinámica de la prueba en la responsabilidad administrativa por la actividad médica’ (2011) 68 Estudios de Derecho, 203. Cerca con Google

PERFETTI, UBALDO, ‘La responsabilità civile del medico’ in by by ORAZIO ABBAMONTE and others, L’evoluzione giurisprudenziale nelle decisioni della Corte di Cassazione - Volume VII - Raccolta di studi in memoria di Antonio Brancaccio (Giuffrè Editore 2013), 109. Cerca con Google

PICARDI, NICOLA, Manuale del processo civile (2nd edn, Giuffrè 2010). Cerca con Google

PRAKKEN, HENRY, and GIOVANNI SARTOR, ‘A Logical Analysis of Burdens of Proof’ in HENDRIK KAPTEIN and others (eds), Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic (Ashgate Publishing 2009), 223. Cerca con Google

REDENTI, ENRICO, and MARIO VELLANI, Diritto processuale civile (Giuffrè 2011). Cerca con Google

REEVES, TONY, and NINETTE DODOO, ‘Standards of Proof and Standards of Judicial Review in European Commission Merger Law’ (2006) 29 Fordham International Law Journal, 1034. Cerca con Google

RHEE, C. H. VAN, and REMME VERKERK, ‘Civil Procedure’ [2006] Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 120. Cerca con Google

RILEY, ALAN, ‘Beyond Leniency: Enhancing Enforcement in EC Antitrust Law’ (2005) 28 World Competition, 377. Cerca con Google

RUSSELL, BERTRAND, ‘Is There a God?’ [1952] commissioned but not published by Illustrated Magazine. Cerca con Google

SALERNO, FRANCESCO, Giurisdizione ed efficacia delle decisioni straniere nel Regolamento (CE) n. 44/2001 - La revisione della Convenzione di Bruxelles del 1968 (3rd edn, Cedam 2006). Cerca con Google

——, ‘La cooperazione giudiziaria in materia civile’ in Diritto dell’Unione Europea - Parte speciale (3rd edn, Giappichelli 2010), 455. Cerca con Google

SÁNCHEZ GRAELLS, ALBERT, ‘The EU’s Accession to the ECHR and Due Process Rights in EU Competition Law Matters: Nothing New Under the Sun?’ in VASILIKI KOSTA and others (eds), The Accession of the EU to the ECHR (Hart Publishing 2014). Cerca con Google

SCHETTINO, ANTONELLO, ‘Il difficile rapporto tra public e private enforcement: il caso dell’accesso agli atti nei programmi di clemenza’ (2013) VIII Studi sull’integrazione europea, 153. Cerca con Google

SCHOEMAN, ELSABE, ‘Rome II and the Substance-Procedure Dichotomy: Crossing the Rubicon’ (2010) 81 Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 81. Cerca con Google

SCORDAMAGLIA-TOUSIS, ANDREAS, EU Cartel Enforcement: Reconciling Effective Public Enforcement with Fundamental Rights, vol. 54 (Klumer Law International 2013). Cerca con Google

SCUFFI, MASSIMO, ‘I poteri inibitori e risarcitori del giudice nazionale antitrust’ in GIAN ANTONIO BENACCHIO and MICHELE CARPAGNANO (eds), I rimedi civilistici agli illeciti anticoncorrenziali. Private Enforcement of Competition Law - Atti del III Convegno di Studio presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Trento 15-16 aprile 2011 (Cedam 2012), 27. Cerca con Google

SIBONY, ANNE-LISE, Le juge et le raisonnement économique en droit de la concurrence (L.G.D.J. 2008). Cerca con Google

——, ‘Limits of Imports from Economics into Competition Law’ in IOANNIS LIANOS and D. DANIEL SOKOL (eds), The Global Limits of Competition Law (Stanford University Press 2012). Cerca con Google

SIRAGUSA, MARIO, ‘Antitrust and Merger Cases in Italy: Standard of Proof, Burden of Proof and Evaluation of Evidence’ in European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart 2011). Cerca con Google

SIRAGUSA, MARIO, and CESARE RIZZA, eds., EU Competition Law - Cartel Law - Restrictive Agreements and Practices between Competitors, vol. III (Claeys & Casteels 2007). Cerca con Google

ŠKUFCA, EVA, ‘Constitutional Court Ruling on Lawfulness of Antitrust Inspections’, August 19, 2013. Cerca con Google

SLATER, DONALD, SÉBASTIEN THOMAS, and DENIS WAELBROECK, ‘Competition Law Proceedings before the European Commission and the Right to a Fair Trial: No Need for Reform?’ [2008] GCLC Working Paper 04/08. Cerca con Google

STANEVIČIUS, MANTAS, ‘Portielje: Bar Remains High for Rebutting Parental Liability Presumption’ (2014) 5 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 24. Cerca con Google

STEIN, ALEX, Foundations of Evidence Law (Oxford University Press 2005). Cerca con Google

STORSKRUBB, EVA, Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered (Oxford University Press 2008). Cerca con Google

SWEENEY, BONNY E., ‘Defining Antitrust Violations in the United States’ in ALBERT A. FOER and RANDY M. STUTZ (eds), Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law in the United States (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2012). Cerca con Google

TARUFFO, MICHELE, ‘Rethinking the Standards of Proof’ (2003) 51 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 659. Cerca con Google

——, ed., La prova nel processo civile (Giuffrè 2012). Cerca con Google

TER HAAR, MAURITS, ‘Obstruction of Investigation in EU Competition Law: Issues and Developments in the European Commission’s Approach’ (2013) 36 World Competition, 247. Cerca con Google

TESAURO, GIUSEPPE, ‘Recenti sviluppi del private antitrust enforcement’ (2011) XIII Mercato concorrenza regole, 427. Cerca con Google

TRAMONTANO, LUIGI, STEFANO ROSSI, and RANIERO BORDON, La nuova responsabilità civile (Wolters Kluwer Italia 2010). Cerca con Google

ULLMANN-MARGALIT, EDNA, ‘On Presumption’ in WILLIAM TWINING and ALEX STEIN (eds), Evidence and Proof (Dartmouth 1992). Cerca con Google

VALERINI, FABIO, ‘Il giudizio di merito nell’azione antitrust’ in LORENZO FEDERICO PACE (ed), Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013), 231. Cerca con Google

VAN BAEL & BELLIS, Competition Law of the European Community (4th edn, Klumer Law International 2005). Cerca con Google

VANDE WALLE, SIMON, Private Antitrust Litigation in the European Union and Japan - A Comparative Perspective (Maklu 2013). Cerca con Google

VEDDER, HANS, ‘Spontaneous Harmonisation of National Competition Laws in the Wake of the Modernisation of EC Competition Law’ (2004) 1 Competition Law Review, 5. Cerca con Google

VENIT, JAMES, ‘Human All Too Human: the Gathering and Assessment of Evidence and the Appropriate Standard of Proof and Judicial Review in Commission Enforcement Proceedings Applying Articles 81 and 82’ in by by CLAUS-DIETER EHLERMANN and MEL MARQUIS, European Competition Law Annual 2009: The Evaluation of Evidence and its Judicial Review in Competition Cases (Hart Publishing 2011). Cerca con Google

VILÀ COSTA, BLANCA, ‘How to Apply Articles 5(1) and 5(3) Brussels I Regulation to Private Enforcement of Competition Law: a Coherent Approach’ in JÜRGEN BASEDOW and others (eds), International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

VÖLCKER, SVEN B., ‘“Case C-360/09, Pfleiderer AG v. Bundeskartellamt, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 14 June 2011”’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 695. Cerca con Google

WAELBROECK, DENIS, DONALD SLATER, and GIL EVEN-SHOSHAN, ‘Study on the Conditions of Claims for Damages in Case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules - Comparative Report’ (Ashurst August 31, 2004). Cerca con Google

WALTON, DOUGLAS, ‘Presumption, Burden of Proof and Lack of Evidence’ (2008) 16 L’analisi linguistica e letteraria, 49. Cerca con Google

WHISH, RICHARD, ‘Damages Actions in the Courts of England and Wales’ in LUIS ANTONIO VELASCO SAN PEDRO (ed), Private Enforcement of Competition Law (Lex Nova 2011). Cerca con Google

WHISH, RICHARD, and DAVID BAILEY, Competition Law (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2012). Cerca con Google

WILDERSPIN, MICHAEL, ‘Jurisdiction Issues: Brussels I Regulation Articles 6(1), 23, 27 and 28 in Antitrust Litigation’ in International Antitrust Litigation - Conflict of Laws and Coordination (Hart Publishing 2012). Cerca con Google

WILS, WOUTER P.J., ‘The Combination of the Investigative and Prosecutorial Function and the Adjudicative Function in EC Antitrust Enforcement: A Legal and Economic Analysis’ (2004) 27 World Competition, 201. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Is Criminalization of EU Competition Law the Answer?’ (2005) 28 World Competition, 117. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Powers of Investigation and Procedural Rights and Guarantees in EU Antitrust Enforcement: the Interplay between European and National Legislation and Case-law’ (2006) 29 World Competition, 3. Cerca con Google

——, ‘The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages’ (2009) 32 World Competition, 3. Cerca con Google

——, ‘EU Antitrust Enforcement Powers and Procedural Rights and Guarantees: the Interplay between EU Law, National Law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2011) 34 World Competition, 189. Cerca con Google

——, ‘Ten Years of Regulation 1/2003 - A Retrospective’ (2013) 4 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 321. Cerca con Google

WINCKLER, ANTOINE, ‘Parent’s Liability: New Case Extending the Presumption of Liability of a Parent Company for the Conduct of its Wholly Owned Subsidiary’ (2011) 2 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 231. Cerca con Google

WOOLF, HARRY, ‘Access to Justice’, July 2006, Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales, Ch. 13 Cerca con Google

YOUROW, HOWARD C., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1996). Cerca con Google

ZAMPA, GIAN LUCA, and GIULIA ATTINÀ, ‘Il riparto dell’onere della prova ai sensi dell’art. 2 Reg. 1/2003 anche con riferimento all’art. 101 § 3 TFUE’ in LORENZO FEDERICO PACE (ed), Dizionario sistematico del diritto della concorrenza (Jovene 2013). Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record

EPrints Logo
Padua@Research is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.