Vai ai contenuti. | Spostati sulla navigazione | Spostati sulla ricerca | Vai al menu | Contatti | Accessibilità

| Crea un account

Boschetto, Chiara (2008) Meccanismi della selezione sessuale postcopulatoria in un guppy (Poecilia reticulata), un pesce teleosteo a fecondazione interna. [Tesi di dottorato]

Full text disponibile come:

[img]
Anteprima
Documento PDF
814Kb

Abstract (inglese)

Given multiple matings from females, sexual selection continues after insemination in the form of postcopulatory sexual selection. This process is formed by two main mechanisms: sperm competition (competition of sperm of two or more males for the fertilization of the eggs of the same female) and cryptic female choice. These act as powerful selective pressures for the evolution of reproductive biology of both males and females. The aim of this thesis is to analyze the relative importance of sperm competition and cryptic female choice in determining a male reproductive success. The study species is the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a freshwater fish, ovoviviparous with internal fertilization. Using artificial insemination, I studied if females can obtain fecundity benefits from mating with colourful males (as predicted by Sheldon's Phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis), the role of sperm number and sperm quality for sperm competition success, repeatability of a male's fertilization success and the role of MHC genes in non directional cryptic female choice. This technique allows to control for many potential confounding variables, as order of mating, number of sperm inseminated and cryptic female choice. From the experiments, it emerges that directional processes in this species are more important for fertilization success rather than non directional processes, even if a part of variance in fertilization success is explained by a male's similarity for MHC genotype with the female.


Statistiche Download - Aggiungi a RefWorks
Tipo di EPrint:Tesi di dottorato
Relatore:Pilastro, Andrea
Dottorato (corsi e scuole):Ciclo 20 > Corsi per il 20simo ciclo > BIOLOGIA EVOLUZIONISTICA
Data di deposito della tesi:30 Gennaio 2008
Anno di Pubblicazione:30 Gennaio 2008
Parole chiave (italiano / inglese):postcopulatory sexual selection; guppy (Poecilia reticulata); polyandry; sperm competition; cryptic female choice; carotenoids; iridescent colouration; MHC genes; genetic similarity;
Settori scientifico-disciplinari MIUR:Area 05 - Scienze biologiche > BIO/05 Zoologia
Struttura di riferimento:Dipartimenti > Dipartimento di Biologia
Codice ID:780
Depositato il:22 Set 2008
Simple Metadata
Full Metadata
EndNote Format

Bibliografia

I riferimenti della bibliografia possono essere cercati con Cerca la citazione di AIRE, copiando il titolo dell'articolo (o del libro) e la rivista (se presente) nei campi appositi di "Cerca la Citazione di AIRE".
Le url contenute in alcuni riferimenti sono raggiungibili cliccando sul link alla fine della citazione (Vai!) e tramite Google (Ricerca con Google). Il risultato dipende dalla formattazione della citazione.

1. Abrahams MV, 1993. The trade off between foraging and courting in male guppy. Animal Behaviour 45:673-681. Cerca con Google

2. Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TB, Boehm T, Milinski M, 2003. Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimize MHC allele number during mate selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54:119-126. Cerca con Google

3. Altuvia Y, Margalit H, 2004. A structure-based approach for prediction of MHCbinding peptides. Methods 34:454-459. Cerca con Google

4. Amitin EG, Pitnick S, 2007. Influence of developmental environment on male- and female-mediated sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:381-391. Cerca con Google

5. Amos W, Sawcer SJ, Feakes RW, Rubinstein DC, 1996. Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nature Genetics 13 390-391. Cerca con Google

6. Andersson M, 1986. Evolution of condition dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-816. Cerca con Google

7. Andersson M, 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

8. Andersson M, 2005. Evolution of classical polyandry: Three steps to female emancipation. Ethology 111:1-23. Cerca con Google

9. Apanius V, Penn D, Slev PR, Ruff LR, Potts WK, 1997. The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Critical Reviews in Immunology 17:179-224. Cerca con Google

10. Arcaro KF, Eklund A, 1999. A review of MHC-based mate preferences and fostering experiments in two congenic strains of mice. Genetica 104:241-244. Cerca con Google

11. Arkush KD, Giese AR, Mendonca HL, McBride AM, Marty GD, Hedrick PW, 2002. Resistance to three patogens in the endangered wrinter-run chinook salmon (Onorhyncus tshawytscha): effects of inbreeding and major histocompatiblity complex genotypes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:966-975. Cerca con Google

12. Arnaiz-Villena A, Festenstein H, 1976. A review of MHC-based mate preferences and fostering experiments in two congenic strains of mice. Genetica 104:241- 244. Cerca con Google

13. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I, 1999. Copulatory behavior, genital morphology and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution 53:147-156. Cerca con Google

14. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T, 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145-164. Cerca con Google

15. Axtner J, Sommer S, 2007. Gene duplication, allelic diversity, selection processes and adaptive value of MHC class II DRB genes of the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus. Immunogenetics 59:417-426. Cerca con Google

16. Baerends GP, Brouwer R, Waterbolk HT, 1955. Ethological studies on Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). An analysis of the male courtship pattern. Behaviour 8:249-334. Cerca con Google

17. Baker CS, Vant MD, Dalebout ML, Lento GM, O'Brien SJ, Yuhki N, 2006. Diversity and duplication of DQB and DRB-like genes of the MHC in baleen whales (suborder: Mysticeti). Immunogenetics 58:283-296. Cerca con Google

18. Ball MA, Parker GA, 1996. Sperm competition games: external fertilization and ‘adaptive’ infertility. Journal of Theoretical Biology 180:141-150. Cerca con Google

19. Barnett M, Telford SR, Tibbles BJ, 1995. Female mediation of sperm competition in the millipede Alloporus uncinatus (Diplopoda: Spirostreptidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36:413-419. Cerca con Google

20. Bartl S, 1998. What sharks can tell us about the evolution of MHC genes. Immunological Reviews 166:317-331. Cerca con Google

21. Bateman AJ, 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368. Cerca con Google

22. Becher SA, Magurran AE, 2004. Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 271:1009-1014. Cerca con Google

23. Becher SA, Russell ST, Magurran AE, 2002. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Molecular Ecology Notes 2:456-458. Cerca con Google

24. Berkeley SA, Chapman C, Sogard SM, 2004. Maternal age as a determinant of larval growth and survival in a marine fish, Sebastes melanops. Ecology 85:1258- 1264. Cerca con Google

25. Bernasconi G, Hellriegel B, Heyland A, Ward PI, 2002. Sperm survival in the female reproductive tract in the fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Journal of Insect Physiology 48:197-203. Cerca con Google

26. Bernatchez L, Landry C, 2003. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:363-377. Cerca con Google

27. Billard R, 1969. La sperm spermatogenese de Poecilia reticulata. Annales de Biologie animale Biochimie Biophysique 9:251-271. Cerca con Google

28. Billard R, 1986. Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species. Reproduction, Nutrition, Développment 26:877-920. Cerca con Google

29. Billard R, Cosson MP, 1990. The energetics of fish sperm motility. In: Controls of Sperm Motility: Biological and Clinical Aspects (Gagnon C, ed). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 155-173. Cerca con Google

30. Billard R, Cosson MP, 1992. Some Problems Related to the Assessment of Sperm Motility in Fresh-Water Fish. Journal of Experimental Zoology 261:122-131. Cerca con Google

31. Birkhead T, Moller AP, 1992. Sperm Competition in Birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. New York: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

32. Birkhead T, Moller AP, Sutherland WJ, 1993. Why do females make it so difficult for males to fertilize their eggs? Journal of Theoretical Biology 161:51-60. Cerca con Google

33. Birkhead TR, 2000. Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice-again. Evolution 54:1057-1060. Cerca con Google

34. Birkhead TR, Chaline N, Biggins JD, Burke T, Pizzari T, 2004. Nontrasitivity of paternity in a bird. Evolution 58:416-420. Cerca con Google

35. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, 1995. Male phenotype and ejaculate quality in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 262:329-334. Cerca con Google

36. Birkhead TR, Martinez JG, Burke T, Froman DP, 1999. Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:1759-1764. Cerca con Google

37. Birkhead TR, Moller AP, 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. London: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

38. Birkhead TR, Petrie M, 1995. Ejaculate features and sperm utilization in peafowl (Pave cristatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 261:153-158. Cerca con Google

39. Birkhead TR, Pizzari T, 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:262-273. Cerca con Google

40. Birkhead TR, Wishart GJ, Biggins JD, 1995. Sperm Precedence in the Domestic Fowl. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 261:285-292. Cerca con Google

41. Bisazza A, Grapputo A, Nigro L, 1997. Evolution of reproductive strategies and male sexual ornaments in poeciliid fishes as inferred by mitochondrial 16 rRNA gene phylogeny. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 9:55-67. Cerca con Google

42. Bischoff RJ, Gould JL, Rubenstein DL, 1985. Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:253- 255. Cerca con Google

43. Bishop JDD, 1996. Female Control of Paternity in the Internally Fertilizing Compound Ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. I. Autoradiographic Investigation of Sperm Movements in the Female Reproductive Tract. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences Cerca con Google

44. 263:369-376. Cerca con Google

45. Bishop JDD, Jones CS, Noble LR, 1996. Female Control of Paternity in the Internally Fertilizing Compound Ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. II. Investigation of Male Mating Success Using RAPD Markers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 263:401-407. Cerca con Google

46. Bjork A, Starmer WT, Higginson DM, Rhodes CJ, Pitnick S, 2007. Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 274:1779-1788. Cerca con Google

47. Blanckenhorn WU, Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Reim C, Teuschl Y, Ward PI, 2002. The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Behavioral Ecology 13:353-358. Cerca con Google

48. Blount JD, Moller AP, Houston DC, 2001. Antioxidants, showy males and sperm quality. Ecology Letters 4:393-396. Cerca con Google

49. Boehm T, Zufall F, 2006. MHC peptides and the sensory evaluation of genotype. Trends in Neurosciences 29:100-107. Cerca con Google

50. Bonneaud C, Chastel O, Federici P, Westerdahl H, Sorci G, 2006. Complex Mhcbased mate choice in a wild passerine. Proceedings of the Royal Society BBiological Sciences 273:1111-1116. Cerca con Google

51. Bonneaud C, Mazuc J, Chastel O, Westerdahl H, Sorci G, 2004. Terminal investment induced by immune challenge and fitness traits associated with major histocompatibility complex in the house sparrow. Evolution 58:2823-2830. Cerca con Google

52. Bozynski CC, Liley NR, 2003. The effect of female presence on spermiation, and of male sexual activity on 'ready' sperm in the male guppy. Animal Behaviour 65:53-58. Cerca con Google

53. Branscomb A, Seger J, White RL, 2000. Evolution of odorant receptors expressed in mammalian testes. Genetics 156:785-797. Cerca con Google

54. Bressac C, Joly D, Devaux J, Serres C, Feneux D, Lachaise D, 1991. Comparative kinetics of short and long sperm in sperm dimorphic Drosophila species. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 19:269-274. Cerca con Google

55. Briskie JV, Montgomerie R, 1992. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 247:89-95. Cerca con Google

56. Brooks R, 1996. Melanin as a visual signal amplifier in male guppies. Naturwissenshaft 83:39-41. Cerca con Google

57. Brooks R, 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406:67-70. Cerca con Google

58. Brown JL, Eklund A, 1994. Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. American Naturalist 143:435-461. Cerca con Google

59. Brown RE, Singh PB, Roser B, 1987. The major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. American Naturalist 143:435-461. Cerca con Google

60. Burness G, Casselman SJ, Schulte-Hostedde AI, Moyes CD, Montgomerie R, 2004. Sperm swimming speed and energetics vary with sperm competition risk in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56:65-70. Cerca con Google

61. Bussiere LF, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R, 2006. Sexual conflict and cryptic female choice in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Evolution 60:792-800. Cerca con Google

62. Carrè D, Sardet C, 1984. Fertilization and early development in Beroë ovata. Developmental Biology 105:188-195. Cerca con Google

63. Casselman SJ, Montgomerie R, 2004. Sperm traits in relation to male quality in colonial spawning bluegill. Journal of Fish Biology 64:1700-1711. Cerca con Google

64. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L, 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-244. Cerca con Google

65. Charnov EL, 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

66. Charnov EL, 1993. Life history invariants. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

67. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T, 1999. Female x Male Interactions in Drosophila Sperm Competition. Science 283:217-220. Cerca con Google

68. Clark AG, Dermitzakis ET, Civetta A, 2000. Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54:1030-1035. Cerca con Google

69. Clark E, Aronson LR, 1951. Sexual behavior in the guppy, Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). Zoological Science 36:49-66. Cerca con Google

70. Constantz GD, 1989. Reproductive biology of Poeciliid fishes. In: Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae) (Meffe GK, Snelson FF, eds). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 33-50. Cerca con Google

71. Cordero C, 1995. Ejaculate substances that affect female insect reproductive physiology and behavior: honest or arbitrary traits? Journal of Theoretical Biology 174:453-461. Cerca con Google

72. Cordoba-Aguilar A, 2002. Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). American Naturalist 160:594-601. Cerca con Google

73. Crudgington HS, Siva-Jothy MT, 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407:655-656. Cerca con Google

74. Cunningham EJA, Cheng KM, 1999. Biases in sperm use in the mallard: no evidence for selection by females based on sperm genotype. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:905-905. Cerca con Google

75. Danielsson I, Askenmo C, 1999. Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:149-156. Cerca con Google

76. Darwin C, 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray. Cerca con Google

77. De Boer RJ, Perelson AS, 1993. How diverse should the immune system be? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 252:171-175. Cerca con Google

78. De Santis R, Pinto MR, 1991. Gamete self-discrimination in ascidians - a role for the follicle cells. Molecular Reproduction and Development 29:47-50. Cerca con Google

79. De Tommaso AW, Nyholm SV, Palmeri KJ, Ishizuka KJ, Ludington WB, Mitchel K, Weissman IL, 2005. Isolation and characterization of a protochordate histocompatibility locus. Nature 438:454-459. Cerca con Google

80. Desoye G, Dohr GA, Ziegler A, 1991. Expression of Human Major Histocompatibility Antigens on Germ-Cells and Early Preimplantation Embryos. Laboratory Investigation 64:306-312. Cerca con Google

81. Dijkstra JM, Katagiri T, Hosomichi K, Yanagiya K, Inoko H, Ototake M, Aoki T, Hashimoto K, Shiina T, 2007. A third broad lineage of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I in teleost fish; MHC class II linkage and processed genes. Immunogenetics 59:305-321. Cerca con Google

82. Ditchkoff SS, Lochmiller RL, Masters RE, Hoofer SR, Van Den Bussche RA, 2001. Major-histocompatibility-complex-associated variation in secondary sexual traits of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus): evidence for good-genes advertisement. Evolution 55:616-625. Cerca con Google

83. Doucet SM, Montgomerie R, 2003. Structural plumage colour and parasites in satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus: implications for sexual selection. Journal of Avian Biology 34:237-242. Cerca con Google

84. Doucet SM, Shawkey MD, Hill GE, Montgomerie R, 2006. Iridescent plumage in satin bowerbirds: structure, mechanisms and nanostructural predictors of individual variation in colour. Journal of Experimental Biology 209:380-390. Cerca con Google

85. Droney DC, 1998. The influence of the nutritional content of the adult male diet on testis mass, body condition and courtship vigour in a Hawaiian Drosophila. Functional Ecology 12:920-928. Cerca con Google

86. Dugatkin LA, Godin JG, 1993. Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects. Behavioral Ecology 4:289-292. Cerca con Google

87. Dussault GV, Kramer VL, 1981. Food and feeding behaviour of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 59:684-701. Cerca con Google

88. Eberhard WG, 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

89. Eberhard WG, 1998. Female roles in sperm competition. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead TR, Moller AP, eds). London: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

90. Eisen JA, 1999. Mechanistic basis for microsatellite instability. In: Microsatellites Evolution and Aplications (Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 34-48. Cerca con Google

91. Eizaguirre C, Laloi D, Massot M, Richard M, Federici P, Clobert J, 2007. Condition dependence of reproductive strategy and the benefits of polyandry in a viviparous lizard. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 274:425-430. Cerca con Google

92. Ekblom R, Saether SA, Grahn M, Fiske P, Kalas JA, Hoglund J, 2004. Major histocompatibility complex variation and mate choice in a lekking bird, the great snipe (Gallinago media). Molecular Ecology 13:3821-3828. Cerca con Google

93. Eklund A, 1997. The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences in wild house mice. Behavioral Ecology 8:630-634. Cerca con Google

94. Eklund A, Egid K, Brown RE, 1991. The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences of male mice. Animal Behaviour 42:693-694. Cerca con Google

95. Endler JA, 1978. A predator's view of animal colour patterns. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:319-364. Cerca con Google

96. Endler JA, 1980. Natural selection on colour pattern in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76-91. Cerca con Google

97. Endler JA, 1983. Natural and sexual selection on colour pattern in poeciliid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 9:173-190. Cerca con Google

98. Endler JA, 1987. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Animal Behaviour 35:1376-1385. Cerca con Google

99. Endler JA, 1991. Variation in the appearance of guppy colour patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Research 31:587- 608. Cerca con Google

100. Endler JA, Houde AE, 1995. Geographic Variation in Female Preferences for Male Traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468. Cerca con Google

101. Evans JP, Kelley JL, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A, 2004. Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271:2035-2042. Cerca con Google

102. Evans JP, Magurran AE, 1999. Male mating behaviour and sperm production characteristics under varying sperm competition risk in guppy. Animal Behaviour 58:1001-1006. Cerca con Google

103. Evans JP, Magurran AE, 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:10074-10076. Cerca con Google

104. Evans JP, Magurran AE, 2001. Patterns of Sperm Precedence and Predictors of Paternity in the Trinidadian Guppy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268:719-724. Cerca con Google

105. Evans JP, Marshall DJ, 2005. Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediate the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution 59:106-112. Cerca con Google

106. Evans JP, Pilastro A, Ramnarine IW, 2003a. Sperm transfer through forced matings and its evolutionary implications in natural guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 78:605-612. Cerca con Google

107. Evans JP, Zane L, Francescato S, Pilastro A, 2003b. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421:360-363. Cerca con Google

108. Faivre B, Grégoire A, Préault M, Cézilly F, Sorci G, 2003. Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science 300:103. Cerca con Google

109. Fan W, Liu YC, Parimoo S, Weissman SM, 1995. Olfactory receptor-like antigens on humans spermatozoon. Nature 225:191-193. Cerca con Google

110. Fedina TY, 2007. Cryptic female choice during spermatophore transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera : Tenebrionidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 53:93- 98. Cerca con Google

111. Fellous M, Dausset J, 1970. Probable haploid expression of HLA antigens on human spermatozoon. Nature 225:191-193. Cerca con Google

112. Fisher DO, Double MC, Blomberg SP, Jennions MD, Cockburn A, 2006. Postmating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild. Nature 444:89-92. Cerca con Google

113. Fisher RA, 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics reviews 7:184-192. Cerca con Google

114. Flajnik MF, Ohta Y, Namikawa-Yamada C, Nonaka M, 1999. Insight into the primordial MHC from studies in ectothermic vertebrates. Immunological Reviews 167:59-67. Cerca con Google

115. Flajnik MFK, Masanori, 2001. Comparative Genomics of the MHC: Glimpses into the Evolution of the Adaptive Immune System. Immunity 15:351-362. Cerca con Google

116. Folstad I, Skarstein F, 1997. Is male germ line control creating avenues for female choice? Behavioral Ecology 8:109-112. Cerca con Google

117. Freeman-Gallant CR, Meguerdichian M, Wheelwright NT, Sollecito SV, 2003. Social pairing and female mating fidelity predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in a songbird. Molecular Ecology 12:3077-3083. Cerca con Google

118. Gage MJG, and PS, Parker GA, 1998. Sperm morphometry in the Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 53:835-840. Cerca con Google

119. Gage MJG, Macfarlane C, Yeates S, Shackleton R, Parker GA, 2002. Relationships between sperm morphometry and sperm motility in the Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 61:1528-1539. Cerca con Google

120. Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA, 2004. Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: Relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Current Biology 14:44-47. Cerca con Google

121. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW, 2005. The evolution of polyandry: intrinsic sire effects contribute to embryo viability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1097-1103. Cerca con Google

122. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW, 2007. Shorter sperm confer higher competitive fertilization success. Evolution 61:816-824. Cerca con Google

123. Gardiner DM, 1978. Utilization of extracellular glucose by spermatozoa of two viviparous fishes. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A:Physiology 59:165-168. Cerca con Google

124. Godfray HCJ, 1994. Parassitoids: Behavioural and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

125. Goldstein DB, Ruiz-Linnares A, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW, 1995. An evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics 139:463-471. Cerca con Google

126. Gomendio M, Roldan ERS, 1991. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 243:181-185. Cerca con Google

127. Grether GF, Kasahara S, Kolluru GR, Cooper EL, 2004. Sex-specific effects of carotenoid intake on the immunological response to allografts in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 271:45-49. Cerca con Google

128. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE, 1999. Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45:437-443. Cerca con Google

129. Grimholt U, Drablos F, Jorgensen SM, Hoyheim B, Stet RJM, 2002. The major histocompatibility class I locus in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): polymorphism, linkage analysis and protein modelling. Immunogenetics 54:570-581. Cerca con Google

130. Gromko MH, Newport MEA, 1988. Genetic basis for remating in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Response to selection based on the behavior of one sex.Behavioral Genetics 18:621-632. Cerca con Google

131. Gunther E, Walter L, 2001. The major histocompatibility complex of the rat (Rattus norvegicus). Immunogenetics 53:520-542. Cerca con Google

132. Halim K, Wong DM, Mittal KK, 1982. The HLA typing of human spermatozoa by two color fluoresces. Tissue Antigens 1990-91. Cerca con Google

133. Hamilton WD, Zuck M, 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384-387. Cerca con Google

134. Hancock JM, 1999. Microsatellites and other simple sequences: genomic context and mutational mechanisms. In: Microsatellites Evolution and Applications (Goldstein DB, Schlötterer C, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1-9. Cerca con Google

135. Harano T, Miyatake T, 2005. Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Animal Behaviour 70:299-304. Cerca con Google

136. Harf R, Sommer S, 2005. Association between major histocompatibility complex class II DRB alleles and parasite load in the hairy-footed gerbil, Gerbillurus paeba, in the southern Kalahari. Molecular Ecology 14:85-91. Cerca con Google

137. Herdman EJ, Kelly CD, Godin JG, 2004. Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticualta): do males prefer larger females as mates? Ethology 110:97-111. Cerca con Google

138. Hildemann WH, Wagner ED, 1954. Intraspecific sperm competition in Lebistes reticulates. The American Naturalist 88:87-91. Cerca con Google

139. Hillgarth N, Ramenofsky M, Wingfield J, 1997. Testosterone and sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology 8:108-109. Cerca con Google

140. Hooglund JL, 1998. Why do female Gunninson's prairie dogs copulate with more than one male? Animal Behaviour 55:351-359. Cerca con Google

141. Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Born J, Huber F, 2003. Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:485-490. Cerca con Google

142. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, 2004. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:87-93. Cerca con Google

143. Houde AE, 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population on Poecilia reticulata (Pisces, Poecliidae) (Guppies). Heredity 69:229-235. Cerca con Google

144. Houde AE, 1997. Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

145. House CM, Simmons LW, 2002. Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270:447-455. Cerca con Google

146. House CM, Simmons LW, 2005. Relative influence of male and female genital morphology on paternity in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Behavioral Ecology 16:889-897. Cerca con Google

147. Howard DJ, Gregory PG, Chu J, Cain ML, 1998. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridization between closely related species. Evolution 52:511-516. Cerca con Google

148. Hughes AL, 1999. Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes. New York: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

149. Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN, 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Animal Behaviour 58:907-916. Cerca con Google

150. Hunter FM, Birkhead TR, 2002. Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Current Biology 12:121-123. Cerca con Google

151. Hurst JL, Payne CE, Nevison CM, Marie AD, Humphries RE, Robertson DHL, 2001. Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature 414:631-634. Cerca con Google

152. Hurt P, Walter L, Sudbrak R, Klages S, Muller I, Shiina T, 2004. The genomic sequence and comparative analysis of the rat major histocompatibility complex. Genome Research 14:631-639. Cerca con Google

153. Janeway C, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik M, 2001. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. New York: Garland. Cerca con Google

154. Jeffrey KJ, Bangham RM, 2000. Do infectious diseases drive MHC diversity? Microbes and Infection 2:1335-1341. Cerca con Google

155. Jennions MD, Petrie M, 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75:21-64. Cerca con Google

156. Johnsen A, Andersen V, Sunding C, Lifjeld JT, 2000. Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature 406:296-299. Cerca con Google

157. Jordan WC, Bruford MW, 1998. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 81 ( Pt 3):239-245. Cerca con Google

158. Kaufman J, Milne S, Gobel TWF, Walker BA, Jacob JP, Zoorob R, al. e, 1999. The chicken B locus is a minimal essential major histocompatibility complex. Nature 401:923-925. Cerca con Google

159. Keil A, Sachser N, 1998. Reproductive benefits from female promiscuous mating in a small mammal. Ethology 104:897-903. Cerca con Google

160. Keller L, 1995. Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:355-360. Cerca con Google

161. Keller L, Reeve HK, 1994. Genetic variability, queen number, and polyandry in social hymenoptera. Evolution 48:694-704. Cerca con Google

162. Keller L, Reeve HK, 1995. Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Advances in the Study of Behavior 24:291-315. Cerca con Google

163. Keller LF, Waller DM, 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:230-241. Cerca con Google

164. Kelley J, Walter L, Trowsdale J, 2005. Comparative genomics of major histocompatibility complexes. Immunogenetics 56:683-695. Cerca con Google

165. Kelly CD, Godin JGJ, Wright JM, 1999. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:2403-2408. Cerca con Google

166. Kemp DJ, 2007. Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 274:1043-1047. Cerca con Google

167. Kemp DJ, Rutowski RL, 2007. Condition dependence, quantitative genetics, and the potential signal content of iridescent ultraviolet butterfly coloration. Evolution 61:168-183. Cerca con Google

168. Kempenaers B, 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494-496. Cerca con Google

169. Kempenaers B, Congdon B, Boag PT, Roberson RJ, 1999. Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behavioral Ecology 10:304-311. Cerca con Google

170. Kempenaers B, Verheyren GR, Dhondt AA, 1997. Extra-pair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behavioral Ecology 8:481-492. Cerca con Google

171. Kennedy CEJ, Endler JA, Poynton SL, McMinn H, 1987. Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21:291-295. Cerca con Google

172. Klein D, 1986. Natural History of the Major Histocompatibility Complex., 1st ed. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons. Cerca con Google

173. Klein J, Ono H, Klein D, O'hUigin C, 1993. The accordion model of MHC evolution. Progress in Immunology 8:137-143. Cerca con Google

174. Knapp LA, Ha JC, Sackett GP, 1996. Parental MHC antigen sharing and pregnancy wastage in captive pigtail macaques. Journal of Reproductive Immunology 32:73-88. Cerca con Google

175. Kobayashi H, Iwamatsu T, 2002. Fine structure of the storage micropocket of spermatozoa in the ovary of the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Zoological Science 19:545-555. Cerca con Google

176. Kodric-Brown A, 1985. Female preference and sexual selection for male coloration in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:199-205. Cerca con Google

177. Kodric-Brown A, Nicoletto PF, 1996. Consensus among females in their choice of males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39:395-400. Cerca con Google

178. Komlos L, Zamir R, Joshua H, Halbrecht I, 1977. Common HLA antigens in couples with repeated abortions. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 7:330- 335. Cerca con Google

179. Konior M, Keller L, Radwan J, 2005. Effects of inbreeding and heritability of sperm competition success in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini. Heredity 94:577- 578. Cerca con Google

180. Konior M, Radwan J, Kolodziejczyk M, 2001. Polyandry increases offspring, fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55:1893-1896. Cerca con Google

181. Kraus FB, Neumann P, Moritz RFA, 2005. Genetic variance of mating frequency in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Sociaux 52:1-5. Cerca con Google

182. Kuckuck C, Greven H, 1997. Notes on the mechanically stimulated discharge of spermiozeugmata in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: a quantitative approach. Zeitschrift fur Fischkunde 4:73-78. Cerca con Google

183. LaMunyon CW, Ward S, 1998. Larger Sperm Outcompete Smaller Sperm in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265:1997-2002. Cerca con Google

184. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L, 2001. 'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268:1279-1285. Cerca con Google

185. Lawlor DA, Zemmour J, Ennis PD, Parham P, 1990. Evolution of class-I MHCgenes and proteins—from natural-selection to thymic selection. Annual Reviews of Immunology 8:23-63. Cerca con Google

186. Lennington S, 1991. The t complex: a story of genes, behavior and populations. Advances in the Study of Behavior 20:51-86. Cerca con Google

187. Lessells CKM, Boag PT, 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: A common mistake. Auk 104:116-121. Cerca con Google

188. Levitan DR, 2000. Sperm velocity and longevity trade off each other and influence fertilization in the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267:531-534. Cerca con Google

189. Lewis SM, Austad SN, 1990. Sources of Intraspecific Variation in Sperm Precedence in Red Flour Beetles. The American Naturalist 135:351-359. Cerca con Google

190. Lewis SM, Austad SN, 1994. Sexual selection in flour beetles: the relationship between sperm precedence and male olfactory attractiveness. Behavioral Ecology 5:223-224. Cerca con Google

191. Liley NR, 1966. Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of Poeciliid fisches. Behaviour supplement 13:1-197. Cerca con Google

192. Liljedal S, Folstad I, Skarstein F, 1999. Secondary sex traits, parasites, immunity and ejaculate quality in the Arctic charr. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:1893-1898. Cerca con Google

193. Locatello L, Rasotto MB, Evans JP, Pilastro A, 2006. Colourful male guppies produce faster and more viable sperm. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1595-1602. Cerca con Google

194. Loekle DM, Madison DM, Christian JJ, 1982. Time dependency and kin recognition of cannibalistic behavior among poeciliid fishes. Behavioral and Neural Biology 35:315-318. Cerca con Google

195. Loyau A, Gomez D, Moureau B, Thery M, Hart NS, Jalme MS, Bennett ATD, Sorci G, 2007. Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock. Behavioral Ecology 18:1123-1131. Cerca con Google

196. Luyten PH, Liley NR, 1985. Geographic variation in the sexual behaviour of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Behaviour 95:164-179. Cerca con Google

197. Luyten PH, Liley NR, 1991. Sexual selection and competitive mating success of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from Trinidad populations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28:329-336. Cerca con Google

198. Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Hakansson T, 1992. Why do females adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355:440-441. Cerca con Google

199. Magurran AE, 1998. Population differentiation without speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353:275-286. Cerca con Google

200. Magurran AE, 2005. Evolutionary Ecology: The Trinidadian Guppy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cerca con Google

201. Magurran AE, Nowak MA, 1991. Another battle of the sexes: the consequence of sexual asymmetry in mating cost and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2546:31-38. Cerca con Google

202. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, 1990. Risk sensitive courtship in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Behaviour 112:194-201. Cerca con Google

203. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, 1994. Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 255:31-36. Cerca con Google

204. Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, Garcia AJ, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS, 2005a. Male fertility in natural populations of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 72:822- 829. Cerca con Google

205. Malo AF, Roldan ERS, Garde J, Soler AJ, Gomendio M, 2005b. Antlers hone tly advertise sperm production and quality. Proceedings of the Royal Society BBiological Sciences 272:149-157. Cerca con Google

206. Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK, 1992. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360:581-583. Cerca con Google

207. Mariette M, Kelley JL, Brooks R, Evans JP, 2006. The effects of inbreeding on male courtship behaviour and coloration in guppies. Ethology 112:807-814. Cerca con Google

208. Markow TA, 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:7756- 7760. Cerca con Google

209. Martin-Villa JM, Longas J, Arnaiz-Villena A, 1999. Cyclic Expression of HLA Class I and II Molecules on the Surface of Purified Human Spermatozoa and Their Control by Serum Inhibin B Levels. Biology of Reproduction 61:1381-1386. Cerca con Google

210. Masvaer M, Liljedal S, Folstad I, 2004. Are secondary sex traits, parasites and immunity related to variation in primary sex traits in the Arctic charr? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271:S40-S42. Cerca con Google

211. Matthews IM, 1998. Mating behaviour and reproductive biology of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (PhD thesis): University of St. Andrews. Cerca con Google

212. Matthews IM, Evans JP, Magurran AE, 1997. Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:695-700. Cerca con Google

213. Matthews IM, Magurran AE, 2000. Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies. Journal of Fish Biology 56:1381-1386. Cerca con Google

214. McConnell TJ, Godwin UB, Cuthbertson BJ, 1998. Expressed major histocormpatibility complex class II loci in fishes. Immunological Reviews 166:291-300. Cerca con Google

215. McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J, Hauber ME, 2002. Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. Journal of Experimental Biology 205:3747-3755. Cerca con Google

216. McLain DK, 1998. Non-genetic benefits of mate choice: fecundity enhancement and sexy sons. Animal Behaviour 139:1089-1101. Cerca con Google

217. Meffe GK, Snelson FF, 1989. An ecological overview of poeciliid fishes. In: Ecology and Evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae) (Meffe GK, Snelson FF, eds). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs; 13-31. Cerca con Google

218. Merila J, Sheldon BC, 1999. Testis size variation in the greenfinch Carduelis chloris: relevance for some recent models of sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45:115-123. Cerca con Google

219. Milinski M, 2003. The function of mate choice in sticklebacks: optimizing Mhc genetics. Journal of Fish Biology 63:1-16. Cerca con Google

220. Milinski M, 2006. The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 37:159-186. Cerca con Google

221. Miller HC, Lambert DM, 2004. Gene duplication and gene conversion in class II MHC genes of New Zealand robins (Petroicidae). Immunogenetics 56:178- 191. Cerca con Google

222. Miller KM, Kaukinen KH, Schulze AD, 2002. Expansion and contraction of major histocompatibility complex genes: a teleostean example. Immunogenetics 53:941-963. Cerca con Google

223. Miyatake T, Matsumura F, 2004. Intra-specific variation in female remating in Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus. Journal of Insect Physiology 50:403-408. Cerca con Google

224. Moya-Larano J, Fox CW, 2006. Ejaculate size, second male size, and moderate polyandry increase female fecundity in a seed beetle. Behavioral Ecology 17:940-946. Cerca con Google

225. Nakamura M, 1998. Multiple mating and cooperative breeding in polygynandrous alpine accentors. II. Male mating tactics. Animal Behaviour 55:277.289. Cerca con Google

226. Nakamura T, Leppert M, O’Connel P, Wolge R, T. H, Culver M, C. M, Fuijimoto E, Hoff M, Kumlin E, White R, 1987. Variable Number of Tandem Repeat (VNTR) Markers for Humean Gene Mapping. Science 235:1616-1622. Cerca con Google

227. Neff BDP, Trevor E., 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology 14:19- 38. Cerca con Google

228. Nei M, Gu X, Sitnikova T, 1997. Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of vertebrate immune system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:7799-7806. Cerca con Google

229. Nei M, Rooney AP, 2005. Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annual Review of Genetics 39:121-152. Cerca con Google

230. Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW, 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:10236-10241. Cerca con Google

231. Nicol A, McLaren A, 1974. An effect of female genotype on sperm transport in mice. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 39:421-424. Cerca con Google

232. Nicoletto PF, 1993. Female sexual response to condition dependent ornaments in the guppy, Poecilia reticuata. Animal Behaviour 46:441-450. Cerca con Google

233. Nilsson T, Fricke C, Arnqvist G, 2003. The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:227-233. Cerca con Google

234. Nowak MA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Austyn JM, 1992. The optimal number of major histocompatibility complex molecules in an individual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89:10896- 10899. Cerca con Google

235. Ober C, 1999. Studies of HLA, fertility and mate choice in a human isolate. Human Reproduction Update 5:103-107. Cerca con Google

236. Ober C, Weitkamp LR, Cox N, al. e, 1997. HLA and mate choice in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics 61:497-504. Cerca con Google

237. Ojanguren AF, Evans JP, Magurran AE, 2005. Multiple mating influences offspring size in guppies. Journal of Fish Biology 67:1184-1188. Cerca con Google

238. Olsen KH, Grahn M, Lohm J, Langefors A, 1998. MHC and kin discrimination in juvenile Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.). Animal Behaviour 56:319-327. Cerca con Google

239. Olsson M, Gullberg A, Tegelstrom H, Madsen T, Shine R, 1994. Can female adders multiple? Nature 369:528. Cerca con Google

240. Olsson M, Madsen T, 1995. Female choice on male quantitative traits in lizards-why is it so rare? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36:179-184. Cerca con Google

241. Olsson M, Madsen T, Ujvari B, Wapstra E, 2004. Fecundity and MHC affects ejaculation tactics and paternity bias in sand lizards. Evolution 58:906-909. Cerca con Google

242. Olsson M, Madsen T, Wapstra E, Silverin B, Ujvari B, Wittzell H, 2005. MHC, health, color, and reproductive success in sand lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58:289-294. Cerca con Google

243. Olsson M, Norbdy J, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Wittsel H, 2003. Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270:S254-S256. Cerca con Google

244. Olsson M, Shine R, 1997. Advantages of multiple matings to females: A test of the infertility hypothesis using lizards. Evolution 51:1684-1688. Cerca con Google

245. Otronen M, 1998. Male asymmetry and postcopulatory sexual selection in the fly Dryomyza anilis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:185-191. Cerca con Google

246. Pai A, Yan G, 2002. Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - B Biological Sciences 269:361-368. Cerca con Google

247. Palumbi SR, 1999. All males are not created equal: Fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96:12632- 12637. Cerca con Google

248. Parenti LR, Rauchenberger M, 1989. Systematic overview of the Poeciliines. In: Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliinae) (Meffe GK, Snelson FF, eds). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 3-12. Cerca con Google

249. Parham P, Otha T, 1996. Population biology of antigen presentation by MHC class I molecules. Science 272:67-74. Cerca con Google

250. Parker GA, 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45:525-567. Cerca con Google

251. Parker GA, 1984. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Strategies. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. London: Academic Press; 2-60. Cerca con Google

252. Parker GA, 1993. Sperm competition games: sperm size and number under adult control. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 253:245-254. Cerca con Google

253. Parker GA, 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead T, Moller AP, eds). New York: Academic Press. Cerca con Google

254. Parker GA, Baker RR, Smith VGF, 1972. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-male phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 36:529-553. Cerca con Google

255. Parker KM, Hughes K, Kim TJ, Hedrick PW, 1998. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis-o-occidentalis) and their utility in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Molecular Ecology 7:361-363. Cerca con Google

256. Parmentier M, Libert F, Schurmans S, Schiffmann S, Lefort A, Eggerickx D, Ledent C, 1992. Expression of members of the putative olfactory receptor gene family in mammalian germ-cells. Nature 355:453-455. Cerca con Google

257. Paterson S, Pemberton JM, 1997. No evidence for major histocompatibility complexdependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:1813-1819. Cerca con Google

258. Penn D, Potts WK, 1998. Chemical signals and parasite mediated sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:391-396. Cerca con Google

259. Penn D, Potts WK, 1999. The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. American Naturalist 153:145-164. Cerca con Google

260. Peters A, Denk AG, Delhey K, Kempenaers B, 2004. Carotenoid-based bill colour as an indicator of immunocompetence and sperm performance in male mallards. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:1111-1120. Cerca con Google

261. Peterson CW, Warner RR, 1998. Sperm competition in fishes. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Birkhead TR, Moller AP, eds). London: Academic Press; 435-464. Cerca con Google

262. Phillips RB, Zimmerman A, Noakes MA, Palti Y, Morasch MR, Eiben L, Ristow SS, Thorgaard GH, Hansen JD, 2003. Physical and genetic mapping of the rainbow trout major histocompatibility regions: Evidence for duplication of the class I region. Immunogenetics 55:561-569. Cerca con Google

263. Pilastro A, Bisazza A, 1999. Insemination efficiency of two alternative male mating tactics in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:1887-1891. Cerca con Google

264. Pilastro A, Evans JP, Sartorelli S, Bisazza A, 2002. Male phenotype predicts insemination success in guppies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269:1325-1330. Cerca con Google

265. Pilastro A, Gasparini C, Boschetto C, Evans JP, 2007a. Colourful male guppies do not provide females with fecundity benefits. Behavioral Ecology in press. Cerca con Google

266. Pilastro A, Mandelli M, Gasparini C, Dadda M, Bisazza A, 2007b. Copulation duration, insemination efficiency and male attractiveness in guppies. Animal Behaviour 74:321-328. Cerca con Google

267. Pilastro A, Simonato M, Bisazza A, Evans JP, 2004. Cryptic female preference for colorful males in guppies. Evolution 58:665-669. Cerca con Google

268. Pitcher TE, Evans JP, 2001. Male phenotype and sperm number in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Canadian Journal of Zoology 79:1891-1896. Cerca con Google

269. Pitcher TE, Neff BD, Rodd FH, Rowe L, 2003. Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270:1623-1629. Cerca con Google

270. Pitcher TE, Rodd FH, Rowe L, 2007. Sexual colouration and sperm traits in guppies. Journal of Fish Biology 70:165-177. Cerca con Google

271. Pitnick S, Brown WD, 2000. Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution 54:1052-1056. Cerca con Google

272. Pitnick S, Markow TA, 1994. Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculates among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. American Naturalist 143:785-819. Cerca con Google

273. Pizzari T, Birkhead TR, 2000. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature 405:787-789. Cerca con Google

274. Pizzari T, Birkhead TR, 2002. The sexually-selected sperm hypothesis: sex-biased inheritance and sexual antagonism. Biological Reviews 77:183-209. Cerca con Google

275. Pizzari T, Jensen P, Cornwallis CK, 2004. A novel test of the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis reveals independent components of fertility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271:51-58. Cerca con Google

276. Pocklington R, Dill L, 1995. Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits. Animal Behaviour 49:1122-1124. Cerca con Google

277. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, 1991. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352:619-621. Cerca con Google

278. Potts WK, Wakeland EK, 1990. Evolution of diversity at the major histocompatibility complex. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 5:181-187. Cerca con Google

279. Prout T, Clark AG, 1996. Polymorphism in Genes That Influence Sperm Displacement. Genetics 144:401-408. Cerca con Google

280. Pyle DW, Gromko MH, 1979. Genetic basis for repeated mating in Drosophila melanogaster. American Naturalist 117:133-146. Cerca con Google

281. Radwan J, 1996. Intraspecific Variation in Sperm Competition Success in the Bulb Mite: A Role for Sperm Size. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 263:855-859. Cerca con Google

282. Radwan J, 1998. Heritability of sperm competition success in the bulb mite, Rhizoglyphus robini. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:321-327. Cerca con Google

283. Reinhardt K, 2001. Determinants of ejaculate size in a grasshoper (Chorthippus parallelus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:503-510. Cerca con Google

284. Reusch TB, Haberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M, 2001. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature 414:300-302. Cerca con Google

285. Reusch TBH, Schaschl H, Wegner KM, 2004. Recent duplication and inter-locus gene conversion in major histocompatibility class II genes in a teleost, the hree-spined stickleback. Immunogenetics 56:427-437. Cerca con Google

286. Reynolds JD, Gross MR, 1992. Female Mate Preference Enhances Offspring Growth and Reproduction in a Fish, Poecilia Reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 250:57-62. Cerca con Google

287. Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T, von Schantz T, 2005. MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 272:759-767. Cerca con Google

288. Rosen DE, Bailey RM, 1963. The poeciliid fishes (Cyrinodontiformes), their structure, zoogeography and systematics. Bullettin of the American Museum of Natural History 126:1-176. Cerca con Google

289. Rowe L, Arnqvist G, Sih A, Krupa JJ, 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:289-293. Cerca con Google

290. Rulicke T, Chapuisat M, Homberger FR, Macas E, Wedekind C, 1998. MHCgenotype of progeny influenced by parental infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 265:711-716. Cerca con Google

291. Rurangwa E, Kime DE, Ollevier F, Nash JP, 2004. The measurement of sperm motility and factors affecting sperm quality in cultured fish. Aquaculture 234:1-28. Cerca con Google

292. Russell ST, Magurran AE, 2006. Intrinsic reproductive isolation between Trinidadian populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1294-1303. Cerca con Google

293. Sato A, Figueroa F, Murray BW, Malaga-Trillo E, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, Sultmann H, Toyosawa S, Wedekind C, Steck N, Klein J, 2000. Nonlinkage of major histocompatibility complex class I and calss II loci in bony fishes. Immunogenetics 51:108-116. Cerca con Google

294. Sato A, Figueroa F, O'hUigin C, Reznick DN, Klein J, 1996. Identification of major histocompatibility complex genes in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Immunogenetics 43:38-49. Cerca con Google

295. Sauermann U, Nurnberg P, Bercovitch FB, Berard JD, Trefilov A, Widdig A, 2001. Increased reproductive success of MHC class II heterozygous males among free-ranging rhesus macaques. Human Genetics 108:249-254. Cerca con Google

296. Schachter B, Weitkamp LR, Johnson EM, 1984. Paterntal HLA compatibility, fetal wastage and neural tube defects: evidence for a T/t-like locus in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics 36:1082-1091. Cerca con Google

297. Schaschl H, Wegner K, 2007. Contrasting mode of evolution between the MHC class I genomic region and class II region in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.; Gasterosteidae: Teleostei). Immunogenetics 59:295-304. Cerca con Google

298. Schlötterer C, Vogl C, Tautz D, 1997. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics 146:309-320. Cerca con Google

299. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS, 2004. Intraspecific variation of testis size and sperm length in the yellow pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): implications for sperm competition and reproductive success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:272-277. Cerca con Google

300. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Millar JS, Hickling GJ, 2005. Condition dependence of testis size in small mammals. Evolutionary Ecology Research 7:143-149. Cerca con Google

301. Schulte-Hostedde AI, Montgomerie R, 2006. Intraspecific variation in ejaculate traits of the northern watersnake (Nerodia sipedon). Journal of Zoology 270:147- 152. Cerca con Google

302. Schwensow N, Fietz J, Dausmann KH, Sommer S, 2007. Neutral versus adaptive genetic variation in parasite resistance: importance of major histocompatibility complex supertypes in a free-ranging primate. Heredity 99:265-277. Cerca con Google

303. Scofield VL, Schlumpberger JM, West LA, Weissman IL, 1982. Protochordate allorecognition is controlled by a MHC-like gene system. Nature 295:499- 502. Cerca con Google

304. Sheldon BC, 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 257:25-30. Cerca con Google

305. Sherborne AL, Thom MD, Paterson S, Jury F, Ollier WER, Stockley P, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL, 2007. The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Current Biology 17:2061-2066. Cerca con Google

306. Shiina T, Imanishi T, Habara T, Aono R, Yamaguchi K, 2002. Comparative genome sequencing analyses of MHC regions and establishment of MHC integrated database (M-INTEGRA). Tissue Antigens 59:7. Cerca con Google

307. Shikano T, Taniguchi N, 2003. DNA markers for estimation of inbreeding depression and heterosis in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Aquaculture Research 34:905-911. Cerca con Google

308. Shohet AJ, Watt PJ, 2004. Female association preferences based on olfactory cues in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55:363- 369. Cerca con Google

309. Shuker DM, Phillimore AJ, Burton-Chellew MN, Hodge SE, West. SA, 2007. The quantitative genetic basis of polyandry in the parassitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Heredity 98:69-73. Cerca con Google

310. Simmons LW, 2001a. The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good sperm hypotheses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:585-594. Cerca con Google

311. Simmons LW, 2001b. Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

312. Simmons LW, Beveridge M, Wedell N, Tregenza T, 2006. Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance by female crickets only revealed by molecular markers. Molecular Ecology 15:3817-3824. Cerca con Google

313. Simmons LW, Parker GA, 1992. Individual Variation in Sperm Competition Success of Yellow Dung Flies, Scatophaga stercoraria. Evolution 46:366-375. Cerca con Google

314. Simmons LW, Wernham J, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Kamien D, 2003. Variation in paternity in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: no detectable influence of sperm numbers or sperm length. Behavioral Ecology 14:539-545. Cerca con Google

315. Singh PB, Brown RE, Roser B, 1987. MHC antigens in urine as olfactory cues. Nature 327:161-164. Cerca con Google

316. Skarstein F, Folstad I, Liljedal S, Grahn M, 2005. MHC and fertilization success in the Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:374-380. Cerca con Google

317. Skinner AMJ, Watt PJ, 2007. Phenotypic correlates of spermatozoon quality in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behavioral Ecology 18:47-52. Cerca con Google

318. Smuts BB, Smuts RW, 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 22:1-61. Cerca con Google

319. Snook RR, 2005. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:46-53. Cerca con Google

320. Solymar BD, Wade WH, 1990. Heritable variation for female mating frequency in field crickets, Gryllus integer. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26:73- 76. Cerca con Google

321. Stet RJM, Kruiswijk CP, Dixon B, 2003. Major histocompatibility lineages and immune gene function in teleost fishes: The road not taken. Critical Reviews in Immunology 23:441-471. Cerca con Google

322. Stockley P, 1997a. No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:1497-1500. Cerca con Google

323. Stockley P, 1997b. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:154-159. Cerca con Google

324. Stockley P, 1999. Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 266:1663-1669. Cerca con Google

325. Stoltz JA, Neff BD, 2006. Sperm competition in a fish with external fertilization: the contribution of sperm number, speed and length. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:1873-1881. Cerca con Google

326. Stone GN, 1995. Female foranging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes. Animal Behaviour 50:405-412. Cerca con Google

327. Stouthamer R, Breeuwer JAJ, Hurst GDD, 1999. Wolbachia pipientis: Microbial manipulator or arthropod reproduction. Annual Reviews on Microbiology 53:71-102. Cerca con Google

328. Stutt AD, Siva-Jothy MT, 2001. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 10:5683-5687. Cerca con Google

329. Swanson WJ, Clark AG, Waldrip-Dail HM, Wolfner MF, Aquadro CF, 2001. Evolutionary EST Analysis Identifies Rapidly Evolving Male Reproductive Proteins in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:7375-7379. Cerca con Google

330. Swanson WJ, Vaquier VD, 1998. Concerted evolution in an egg receptor for a rapidly evolving abalone sperm protein. Science 281:710-712. Cerca con Google

331. Tadler A, 1999. Selection of a conspicuous male genitalic trait in the seedbug Lygaeus simulans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series BBiological Sciences 266:1773-1777. Cerca con Google

332. Taylor JS, Durkin JM, Breden F, 1999. The death of a microsatellite: a phylogenetic perspective on microsatellite interruptions. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:567-572. Cerca con Google

333. Telford SR, Jennions MD, 1998. Establishing cryptic female choice in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:216-218. Cerca con Google

334. Thornhill R, 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist 122:765-788. Cerca con Google

335. Tregenza T, Wedell N, 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726-1730. Cerca con Google

336. Tregenza T, Wedell N, 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Molecular Ecology 9:1013-1027. Cerca con Google

337. Tregenza T, Wedell N, 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71-73. Cerca con Google

338. Trowsdale J, 1995. "Both bird and man and beast": comparative organization of MHC genes. Immunogenetics 41:1-17. Cerca con Google

339. Uglem I, Galloway TF, Rosenqvist G, Folstad I, 2001. male dimorphism, sperm traits and immunology in the corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50:511-518. Cerca con Google

340. van der Ven K, Fimmers R, Engels G, van der Ven H, Krebs D, 2000. Evidence for major histocompatibility complex-mediated effects on spermatogenesis in humans. Human Reproduction 15:189-196. Cerca con Google

341. van Oosterhout C, Joyce DA, Cummings SM, 2006a. Evolution of MHC class IIB in the genome of wild and ornamental guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Heredity 97:111-118. Cerca con Google

342. van Oosterhout C, Joyce DA, Cummings SM, Blais J, Barson NJ, Ramnarine IW, Mohammed RS, Persad N, Cable J, 2006b. Balancing selection, random genetic drift, and genetic variation at the major histocompatibility complex in two wild populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 60:2562- 2574. Cerca con Google

343. Van Oosterhout C, Trigg RE, Carvalho GR, Magurran AE, Hauser L, Shaw PW, 2003. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: How the guppy lost its spots. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:273-281. Cerca con Google

344. Vanderhaeghen P, Schurmans S, Vassart G, Parmentier M, 1997. Specific repertoire of olfactory receptor genes in the male germ cells of several mammalian species. Genomics 39:239-246. Cerca con Google

345. Vaquier VD, 1998. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science 281:1995- 1998. Cerca con Google

346. Viken A, Fleming IA, Rosenqvist G, 2006. Premating Avoidance of Inbreeding Absent in Female Guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 112:716-723. Cerca con Google

347. Vladic TV, Afzelius BA, Bronnikov GE, 2002. Sperm quality as reflected through morphology in salmon alternative life histories. Biology of Reproduction 66:98-105. Cerca con Google

348. Vladic TV, Jarvi T, 2001. Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 268:2375-2381. Cerca con Google

349. von Schantz T, Wittzell H, Goranson G, Grahn M, Persson K, 1996. MHC genotype and male ornamentation: genetic evidence for the Hamilton-Zuck model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 263:265-271. Cerca con Google

350. Wade WH, Chang NW, 1995. Increased male fertility in Tribolium confusum beetles after infection with the intracellular parasite Wolbachia. Nature 373:72-74. Cerca con Google

351. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R, 1991. CHELEX-100 as medium for simple extraction of DANN for PCR-based typing for forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506-513. Cerca con Google

352. Ward PI, 2000. Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Evolution 54:1680-1686. Cerca con Google

353. Watson PJ, 1991. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphila litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour 41:343-360. Cerca con Google

354. Watson PJ, 1998. Multi-male mating and female choice increase offspring growth in the spider Neriene litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour 55:387-403. Cerca con Google

355. Wedekind C, Chapuisat M, Macas E, Rulicke T, 1996. Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with the MHC and something else. Heredity 77 400-409. Cerca con Google

356. Wedekind C, Furi S, 1997. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:1471-1479. Cerca con Google

357. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke A, 1995. MHC-Dependent Mate Preferences in Humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 260:245-249. Cerca con Google

358. Wedekind C, Walker M, Portmann J, Cenni B, Muller R, Binz T, 2004. MHC-linked susceptibility to a bacterial infection, but no MHC-linked cryptic female choice in whitefish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:11-18. Cerca con Google

359. Wedell N, 1997. Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10:315-325. Cerca con Google

360. Wedell N, 2001. Female remating in butterflies: interaction between female genotype and nonfertile sperm. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:746-754. Cerca con Google

361. Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA, 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:313-320. Cerca con Google

362. Wegner KM, Kalbe M, Kurtz J, Reusch TBH, Milinski M, 2003a. Parasite selection for immunogenetic optimality. Science 301:1343-1343. Cerca con Google

363. Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Kalbe M, 2003b. Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:224-232. Cerca con Google

364. Wenink PW, Groen AF, Roelke-Parker ME, Prins HTH, 1998. African buffalo maintain high genetic diversity in the major histocompatibility complex in spite of historically known population bottlenecks. Molecular Ecology 7:1315-1322. Cerca con Google

365. Westerdahl H, Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, 2004. Between-year variation of MHC allele frequencies in great reed warblers: selection or drift? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:485-492. Cerca con Google

366. Wilkinson GS, Presgraves DC, Crymes L, 1998. Male eyes span in stalked-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391:276-279. Cerca con Google

367. Williams GC, 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Cerca con Google

368. Wilson N, Tubman SC, Eady PE, Robertson GW, 1997. Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:1491-1495. Cerca con Google

369. Winge O, 1937. Succession of broods in Lebistes. Nature 149:573-584. Cerca con Google

370. Wittzell H, Madsen H, Westerdahl H, Shine R, Von Schantz T, 1999. MHC variation in birds and reptiles. Genetica 104:301-309. Cerca con Google

371. Wolfner MF, 2002. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88:85-93. Cerca con Google

372. Wootton RJ, 1990. Ecology of teleost fishes. London: Chapman & Hall. Yamagishi M, Ito Y, Tsubaki Y, 1992. Sperm competition in the melon fly, Bactrocera curcurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): effects of sperm "longevity" on sperm precedence. Journal of Insect Behavior 5:599-609. Cerca con Google

373. Yasui Y, 1997. A "good sperm" model can explain the evolution of costly, multiple mating by females. American Naturalist 149:573-584. Cerca con Google

374. Yasui Y, 1998. The `genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:246-250. Cerca con Google

375. Younger RM, Amadou C, Bethel G, Ehlers A, Fischer L, K., 2000. Characterization of clustered MHC-linked olfactory receptor genes in human and mouse. Genome Research 11:51930. Cerca con Google

376. Zahavi A, 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53:205-214. Cerca con Google

377. Zajitschek SRK, Evans JP, Brooks R, 2006. Independent effects of familiarity and mating preferences for ornamental traits on mating decisions in guppies. Behavioral Ecology 17:911-916. Cerca con Google

378. Zeh JA, 1997. Polyandry and enhanced reproductive success in the harlequinbeetleriding pseudoscorpion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 40:111- 118. Cerca con Google

379. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, 1994. Last-Male Sperm Precedence Breaks down when Females Mate with Three Males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 257:287-292. Cerca con Google

380. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, 1996. The evolution of polyandry. 1. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 263:1711-1717. Cerca con Google

381. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, 1997. The evolution of polyandry. 2. Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 264:69-75. Cerca con Google

382. Ziegler A, Dohr G, Uchanska-Ziegler B, 2002. Possible roles for products of polymorphic MHC and linked olfactory receptor genes during selection processes in reproduction. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 48:34-42. Cerca con Google

Download statistics

Solo per lo Staff dell Archivio: Modifica questo record